Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Shortstop to Utility: Examining the Twins' Prospect Development Approach


    Cody Christie

    Many of baseball’s best players are signed or drafted as a shortstop before eventually moving to another position. This process can work, but the Twins may have encountered a stumbling block regarding their development process.

    Image courtesy of Kareem Elgazzar - USA Today Sports

    Twins Video

    The Minnesota Twins have long emphasized drafting and developing athletic players with defensive versatility. This philosophy has allowed the organization to remain flexible in constructing its rosters. Still, it also raises questions about whether it hinders players from maximizing their potential at a single position. The cases of Royce Lewis, Brooks Lee, and Austin Martin highlight how the Twins’ development strategy starts with grooming players as shortstops before transitioning them into multi-position roles. While this approach has its merits, it’s worth asking: Is it a flaw in the team’s development process?

    A Common Starting Point
    Outside of catcher, shortstop is often considered the most demanding position in baseball. Players who can handle shortstop defensively are typically among the best athletes on the field, and developing them at this position ensures they are challenged at the highest level. Lewis, the first overall pick in the 2017 MLB Draft, exemplifies this. When drafted, Lewis was lauded for his elite athleticism, strong arm, and high baseball IQ, which made him an ideal shortstop prospect.

    Similarly, Lee, taken eighth overall in the 2022 draft, and Martin, a top-10 pick in 2020 by the Blue Jays before being acquired by Minnesota, were both developed as shortstops in the early stages of their careers. Each player entered the Twins’ system with a reputation for being able to handle the position, but none appear to be part of the organization’s long-term plan at shortstop. Instead, their development paths have diverged into roles emphasizing versatility over positional specialization.

    The Shift Away from Shortstop
    Lewis’s journey is a prime example of this shift (No, that isn't a defense joke). Lewis has understandably lost a step or two after losing two seasons to injuries, including tearing his ACL twice. Despite his initial work as a shortstop, the Twins moved him to other positions, including second and third base, to keep his bat in the lineup while Carlos Correa manned shortstop. This transition highlights the Twins’ desire to maximize roster flexibility. Still, it also begs the question: Could Lewis have developed into an elite defender at another position if given more time in the minors to focus on that spot?

    Lee’s development trajectory suggests a similar fate. While Lee played primarily at shortstop in college and the minors, scouting reports have often projected him as a better fit at third or second base due to what some consider average range and arm strength. The Twins have already experimented with him at multiple infield positions, preparing him for a future where he could be a multi-positional asset rather than a cornerstone shortstop.

    Martin’s case is even more complex. Drafted as a shortstop, Martin’s defensive struggles at the position became apparent early in his professional career. The Twins kept playing him at shortstop before starting to transition him to second base, third base, and the outfield. in 2023 While his versatility has been valuable, the lack of a defined position has arguably impacted his overall development, mainly as he’s worked to regain his offensive form. Last season, he ranked as one of the team’s worst defenders (-8 OAA), but he was also placed in defensive positions with limited experience. 

    The Benefits and Drawbacks of Versatility
    Minnesota’s preference for players with defensive flexibility has clear benefits. It allows the team to adapt to injuries, create advantageous matchups, and build depth throughout the roster. However, there’s a potential downside: Players who move between multiple positions may struggle to master any single position. Defensive consistency often comes from repetition, and constant shuffling can hinder a player’s ability to excel in one spot.

    Additionally, there’s an argument to be made that the Twins’ approach limits the chances of developing a true franchise shortstop. By drafting athletic shortstops but quickly transitioning them into utility roles, the team may inadvertently diminish the opportunity to cultivate a long-term solution at one of baseball’s most critical positions. It helps to have Correa manning that position, but age and injuries have started to impact the team’s superstar. Minnesota needs a backup plan for shortstop if Correa misses time in 2025. 

    A Question of Philosophy
    The Twins’ approach reflects a broader trend in modern baseball, where positional flexibility is highly valued. Teams want players who can adapt to different roles, and Minnesota has embraced this philosophy wholeheartedly. Yet, as the cases of Lewis,  Lee, and Martin illustrate, this strategy comes with trade-offs. While it’s difficult to argue against the importance of flexibility, it’s worth questioning whether the Twins’ development process prioritizes versatility at the expense of maximizing a player’s potential at one position.

    As the 2025 season approaches, the Twins’ roster construction will continue to rely on players who can fill multiple roles. Lewis may find himself bouncing between second and third base, Lee could split time across the infield, and Austin Martin’s future remains uncertain as he looks to carve out a consistent role. Whether this approach is a flaw or simply a strategic choice remains a topic of debate, but one thing is clear: The Twins’ commitment to versatility will shape the development of their top prospects for years to come.

    Should the Twins let prospects focus on one defensive position? Leave a comment and start the discussion. 

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    17 minutes ago, DocBauer said:

    Did they really think more time at SS would help him at 2B/3B?

    They obviously did.  However one play, an easy double-play grounder, was enough to convince me otherwise.  The experts labored under the heavy disadvantage of having seen more of him.  😀

    18 minutes ago, ashbury said:

    They obviously did.  However one play, an easy double-play grounder, was enough to convince me otherwise.  The experts labored under the heavy disadvantage of having seen more of him.  😀

    Even more concerning, I recall FO types saying that he was already a mlb ready outfielder.  This was when he was still getting reps at SS.  That is some seriously poor player evaluation as he is not close to that.  If you want him to be at least average somewhere it has to be 2b or left field.  His arm is just not good enough to be decent in CF or any other infield spot.

    6 minutes ago, Linus said:

    Even more concerning, I recall FO types saying that he was already a mlb ready outfielder.  This was when he was still getting reps at SS.  That is some seriously poor player evaluation as he is not close to that.  If you want him to be at least average somewhere it has to be 2b or left field.  His arm is just not good enough to be decent in CF or any other infield spot.

    His arm isn't adequate for the most demanding positions, and yet the plays that stand out for me involve failings between the ears, and I dislike ever saying that.  The AFL double-play ball I mentioned was a little underhand toss.  There was a delayed decision on a throw to home this past season that cost a run.  Those two stand out to me and I don't have positive memories on defense to balance that out for him.

    15 minutes ago, ashbury said:

    His arm isn't adequate for the most demanding positions, and yet the plays that stand out for me involve failings between the ears, and I dislike ever saying that.  The AFL double-play ball I mentioned was a little underhand toss.  There was a delayed decision on a throw to home this past season that cost a run.  Those two stand out to me and I don't have positive memories on defense to balance that out for him.

    Some guys have awareness and/or instincts and some don't. Correa, for instance, has amazing instincts. Some guys don't have it. A great athlete doesn't necessarily have good instincts. 

    37 minutes ago, DocBauer said:

    Some guys have awareness and/or instincts and some don't. Correa, for instance, has amazing instincts. Some guys don't have it. A great athlete doesn't necessarily have good instincts. 

    Some players have natural talent, for a task,  some can work their way up, the those with natural talent do not have handicaps to over come.

    A great athlete -- athlete at what?

    45 minutes ago, RpR said:

    Some players have natural talent, for a task,  some can work their way up, the those with natural talent do not have handicaps to over come.

    A great athlete -- athlete at what?

    Natural athletes don't have things/handicaps to overcome? 

    Have I quoted you accurately? 

    If I have, many is the college athlete, even high "star" talents who are great athletes who never become great players. Many great athletes are selected in the MLB draft, or signed as international FA, who never turn out to be ML players. 

    SOME have limited athletic ability when it comes to PRO sports, but work their tail off to become something. Arraez would be an example. 

    But being a great athlete doesn't mean you will make it, or have a long career, much less be a difference maker. Martin reaching MLB is a success in doing so. But just being a great athlete doesn't mean you find success. While I have hope Martin will figure something out to be a competent hitter and defender, and allowing for him being a rookie and a weird development curve that more than a few prospects had "around" the lost 2020 covid season, he really hasn't shown anything thus far but brief glimpses as to any kind of BAT performer. And his potential defense has been suspect at best so far.

    I recall when he had about a 1/3-1/2 season of hitting success in 2023 at AAA where a lot of posters had him penciled is as a major contributor for 2024. I never understood that. 

    I don't dislike the kid, I don't wish ill will to the kid, and I wish his athleticism would allow him to raise his offense and defense up another level or two and surprise the hell out of us in 2025.

    But just being athletic doesn't mean you can play ML defense or hit at that level.

    Or did I misundstand your comment?

    The primary reason, under this front office, that the Twins have been unable to develop defensively valuable shortstops is because this front office does not value defense or know how to coach it.

    Royce Lewis is a perfect example. Lewis has both the arm and the range to cover the position, yet he has well documented throwing issues. Trevor Plouffe is on record talking about being perplexed at how the Twins have been unable to address the issues, and how the Twins have mishandled Lewis. Obviously, that's just Plouffe's opinion, but if the front office apologists are going to talk about all the knowledge Baldelli and the front office have, a guy who played SS at the MLB in the current analytics era (Plouffe) would be considered valuable.

    It's clear the front office doesn't value defense. They don't draft defense first players at high levels, and they certainly don't develop defensive skills well (at any position). This front office values the bat and tools. For the most part, tools = defense to the Twins. It's like a spreadsheet or AI screening tool for job qualifications. 
    Twins Center Fielder opening. Job Requirements: Speed tool 55 grade. Arm tool 50 grade. If you meet these qualifications, apply for the opening today!

    18 hours ago, DocBauer said:

    Natural athletes don't have things/handicaps to overcome? 

    Have I quoted you accurately? 

    If I have, many is the college athlete, even high "star" talents who are great athletes who never become great players. Many great athletes are selected in the MLB draft, or signed as international FA, who never turn out to be ML players. 

    SOME have limited athletic ability when it comes to PRO sports, but work their tail off to become something. Arraez would be an example. 

    But being a great athlete doesn't mean you will make it, or have a long career, much less be a difference maker. Martin reaching MLB is a success in doing so. But just being a great athlete doesn't mean you find success. While I have hope Martin will figure something out to be a competent hitter and defender, and allowing for him being a rookie and a weird development curve that more than a few prospects had "around" the lost 2020 covid season, he really hasn't shown anything thus far but brief glimpses as to any kind of BAT performer. And his potential defense has been suspect at best so far.

    I recall when he had about a 1/3-1/2 season of hitting success in 2023 at AAA where a lot of posters had him penciled is as a major contributor for 2024. I never understood that. 

    I don't dislike the kid, I don't wish ill will to the kid, and I wish his athleticism would allow him to raise his offense and defense up another level or two and surprise the hell out of us in 2025.

    But just being athletic doesn't mean you can play ML defense or hit at that level.

    Or did I misundstand your comment?

    A player who has a natural talent at any position , does not have the handi-cap , to over come, of having to learn how to play WELL at which ever postition he is a natural at.

    Athletic means nothing other than the person was born with a natural physique for doing physical activities.

    Has zero to do with where he has a born talent , or level of talent, he was born with.

    A person could be a champion runner, tennis player, wrestler but not have the talent to be even an average baseball player; he may be a great athlete but stink at baseball.

     




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...