Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    October's Dark Horses: Unmasking the Playoff Pathways for Baseball's Mediocre Teams


    Hans Birkeland

    Do middling teams that sneak into October and end up making noise follow a formula? Or is it just a crapshoot? Let's look at the numbers and see if the Twins could be one of those fortunate few.

    Image courtesy of © Tommy Gilligan-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    The Twins are currently dysfunctional, with the offense on life support and requiring consistent player-led interventions to avoid going comatose. But part of what was initially exciting about this roster was its combination of playoff-ready ingredients. 

    Like it or not, this team will likely host a playoff series in three months, with a 55.9% chance of winning the division, according to Fangraphs. 

    I have long held a theory that teams need at least three good-to-great hitters, at least two good-to-great pitchers, and an elite closer to compete in October. If this current Twins team has its hitters figure it out to any degree, that is possible, given their quality rotation and Jhoan Duran. I wanted to find out if this year's team is the type of mediocre regular season team that can suddenly thrive in the playoffs, so I took a look at the last ten seasons in MLB and singled out the teams with the best regular season records along with the pennant winners, to see if my theory holds any water. 

    Methodology: A compiled list of all teams with the best regular season record in their respective league and pennant winners. Teams with the best record that also won the pennant were counted in both data sets and added how many 120 OPS+ or better hitters and 120 ERA+ pitchers each team while also including the WPA of their closer. For hitters, I included anyone with 200 plate appearances or more who were available for the playoffs. I used a minimum of fifteen starts for pitchers while being available for the playoffs. For the closer, I used full season stats for whoever the closer was once the playoffs began. The only exception was for the 2022 Phillies. I added Jose Alvarado and Seranthony Dominguez's WPA together because their usage was overly matchup-based when October rolled around.

    Factor one: Having a group of good-to-great hitters

    The most significant discrepancy between teams with great regular season records and teams with postseason success was their collection of hitters. Pennant winners averaged 4.5 hitters with a 120 OPS+ or higher, while teams with the best record averaged 4.15. Some outliers include the 2014 Royals, who had zero hitters 20% better than the league average while still winning the pennant, and the 2019 Dodgers, who had seven hitters eclipse that mark while losing in the NLDS.

    The 2023 Twins have much work to do to assemble a group of plus hitters. Still, based on track record, you can have some hope that Byron BuxtonCarlos Correa, and Jorge Polanco will gravitate to that 120 OPS+ level, with Alex Kirilloff, Edouard Julien , and Royce Lewis having the potential to join them. If you take an optimistic view, they look similar to the 2015 Mets, who had a decent collection of hitters, including Lucas Duda (who was good for a few years), Curtis GrandersonDavid Wright, and a rookie Michael Conforto. But the team ascended to another level when they acquired Yoenis Cespedes at the trade deadline for then-prospect Michael Fulmer. Going from four plus hitters to five made a massive difference for that team as they went 36-19 in August and September and eventually reached the World Series. 

    Would someone like Paul Goldschmidt or even Justin Turner have a Cespedes-type impact?

    Factor two: Having a couple of good-to-great starting pitchers
    It has long been a cliche that elite starting pitching wins in the playoffs, but according to my data, it didn't make much of a difference in separating the regular season champs and the pennant winners. 

    The teams with the best season record averaged 2.70 starters of that type, while pennant winners averaged 2.65. Notables include the 2020 and 2022 Dodgers teams that had five pitchers 20% better than the league average, and the 2013 Red Sox, 2014 Angels, 2014 Giants, 2015 Royals, 2018 Brewers, and 2021 Rays with only one starter of that type each. No team has won a pennant or had the best record in its league without a 120 ERA+ starter on its roster.

    The 2023 Twins have three such pitchers in Joe RyanSonny Gray, and Bailey OberPablo Lopez (110 ERA+) could get there with a solid second half, and his peripherals make that possible. Only five teams in my data pool had four starters or more eclipse the threshold: the 2015 Cardinals (4), 2016 Cubs (4), and the aforementioned Dodgers teams as well as their 2019 squad (4).

    Factor three: Having a great closer
    According to WPA, pennant winners have had better closers than regular season stalwarts, with an average figure of 2.513. 

    Teams with the best records averaged 2.438. The best performer was, far and away Kenley Jansen for the Dodgers in 2017, with a 5.70 mark. Second was Koji Uehara at 4.10 in 2013 for the champion Red Sox, and the worst was Sergio Romo's 0.3 mark for the champion 2014 Giants (oddly enough, Jansen's 0.4 in 2019 was the second worst).

    Jhoan Duran already has a 1.3 WPA this year after posting an impressive 4.6 in 2022. Being able to deploy him in the playoffs, with all the extra off days, could be a huge advantage for the Twins if they can scrape in.

    Comparables (Reached World Series with 93 or fewer regular season wins):
    2014 Royals: Zero hitters above 120 OPS+, three pitchers above 120 ERA+, 2.8 Closer WPA
    2014 Giants: Three hitters, one pitcher, 0.3 Closer WPA
    2015 Mets: Five hitters, two pitchers, 3.7 Closer WPA
    2018 Dodgers: Eight hitters, three pitchers, 1.5 Closer WPA
    2019 Nationals: Three hitters, three pitchers, 1.8 Closer WPA
    2021 Braves: Four hitters, three pitchers, 1.9 Closer WPA
    2022 Phillies: Four hitters, two pitchers, 2.0 Closer WPA

    2014 was a weird year, with the Yankees missing the playoffs, the Astros still coming out of their rebuild, and the Dodgers weren't yet the Dodgers. The thoroughly unimpressive Giants and Royals duked it out in the World Series, and those two teams did not have at least three hitters above a 120 OPS, two pitchers above 120 ERA+, and/or a closer with over a 1.5 WPA (we'll call these thresholds the test). The next five teams did; what about the regular season stalwarts?

    Teams with the best regular season record that failed that test:
    2013 Cardinals*
    2013 Red Sox*
    2014 Angels
    2014 Nationals
    2015 Royals*
    2015 Cardinals
    2016 Rangers
    2018 Brewers
    2019 Dodgers
    2020 Dodgers*
    2021 Rays

    Teams with best regular season record that passed the test:
    2016 Cubs*
    2017 Guardians
    2017 Dodgers*
    2018 Red Sox*
    2019 Astros*
    2020 Rays*
    2022 Astros*
    2022 Dodgers

    *Reached World Series

    So of the teams that paced their league in regular season wins, four of eleven (36%) reached the World Series when failing my test, and six of eight (75%) reached the final round while passing my test. Of the teams that didn't post their league's best record but still reached the World Series, seven of ten passed the test.

    My most scientific theory is that baseball is a stupid game. 

    For all their success, the Tampa Bay Rays have an injury-battered rotation and a closer with a nerve condition in his fingers that flares up in the cold (does it get cold in October?). Further out West, does anyone expect Nathan Eovaldi to stay healthy? If he doesn't, the now-dominant Rangers will have a rotation of Jon GrayMartin Perez, and Dane Dunning in October. Their closer signed in March for 1.5M.

    The Guardians have three rookies, no Triston McKenzie, and the 2023 version of Shane Bieber (who they may trade) pitching in front of one of the worst offenses in the league. The Rangers and Rays have several quality teams trying to chase them down, by contrast. Certainly, the trade deadline could alter some things, but the more balanced schedule looks like a coup for the Twins and Brewers, at least so far.

    The point is that the Twins are frustrating and don't seem playoff-worthy. But they are better set for October than the two top teams in the AL regarding their path to the playoffs and the roster they could roll out once there. We saw what happened last year with both the Braves and Dodgers exiting in the NLDS after dominant regular seasons, while the seemingly middling Phillies and Padres rode their good-to-great hitters and pitchers with elite closers to surprising postseason success. Like the 2015 Mets, it might take the addition of one good bat to turn this Twins team into a dark horse contender.


     

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    15 hours ago, jkcarew said:

    But team-wise doesn’t 0 - 18 suggest to you that teams that are clearly weaker than the playoff opponent almost never win one series…let alone two?

    Never once were the Twins on par with the opponent going in…way weaker…not really close, including 2019 where the substandard ALC allowed them to win 100+ games, while still somehow being 5 games under 500 against winning teams.

    You don’t have to be dominant, you don’t even have to be as good…but you better be within shouting distance. This club can win the division, with or without help, IMO. But, I don’t see them being within shouting distance…even with a rental or two…of any of the prospective opponents.

    No it does not and actually the 0-18 doesn't even get close to suggesting that they are clearly weaker. 

    The first loss in that 0-18 was game two of the 2004 American league divisional series against the Yankees. 

    The 18th loss of that 0-18 was game two of the 2020 wild card series against the Astros. 

    There wasn't a single player on the 2004 team that was on the 2020 team so loss #1 clearly has nothing to do with loss #18. Even if the same players were involved... the opponents teams were different year to year, month to month, week to week, game to game. 

    Once you dive into the beginnings, the middle and the end of the 0-18 streak to find common players you start to realize that even the players that were part of this for multiple years are still different as individuals from year to year, month to month, week to week, game to game. 

    Joe Mauer was a .432 OPS over 11 AB's in 2006 and a 1,000 OPS over 12 AB's in 2009 and a .558 in 2010 over 12 AB's.

    If you told me that you knew how Joe Mauer was going to perform in those 12 AB's in the 2006, 2009, 2010 playoffs after regular season OPS totals of .936, 1,031 and .871 in those years. I would have told you that you are... amazing. 😉

    However... if you really want to impress me... you'd have my ear if you would have told me that Orlando Hudson was going to lead the Twins in 2010 with a .917 OPS over 12 AB's after a .701 OPS during the regular season. 

    Now I realize that you are not talking about individual players... you are talking about teams being clearly better than the Twins. Regardless... my point about individual players in a small sample size still stands because individual performances are reason for the ream result. Good luck predicting 12 AB's for each individual player based upon... well I really don't know what you are going to base these predictions on. 

    To bring this point home. It's about 60 playoff AB's for an every day player to get all the way through the playoffs. I've been pretty hard on Max Kepler. I don't think he should be on the roster. However, Max has hit 5 home runs in his past 62 AB's. If he did this during the playoffs... we would be singing songs about him. I don't know... you don't know... Max doesn't know... what he will do in the 2023 playoffs. 

    However... lets talk about the teams since that is what you seem to be talking about.

    In 2019... you say that the 101 win Twins were "way weaker" compared to the the 103 win Yankees. You say the Twins were 5 games under .500 against teams with a winning record and claiming we got fat against the weak AL Central. 

    The implication of your statement is that the Twins beat the weak teams while the Yankees beat the good teams. OK... Let's say that's true. If the Yankees won 103 by beating the GOOD teams and the Twins won 101 by beating the WEAK teams. The win total difference between 103 and 101 has to be made up somewhere so if you are correct... it would also HAVE TO MEAN that the Yankees LOST to the WEAK teams to make up the win/loss difference. No penalty for losing to the weak teams?  

    Just in case the above point isn't getting anywhere... it should but just in case it isn't... I'll post the 2019 head to head records and you can tell me what team "clearly" dominated the Twins during the 2019 regular season.

    Opponent (Games) Won Lost WP
    Atlanta Braves (3) 1 2 0.333
    Baltimore Orioles (6) 6 0 1.000
    Boston Red Sox (6) 3 3 0.500
    Chicago White Sox (19) 13 6 0.684
    Cleveland Guardians (19) 9 10 0.474
    Detroit Tigers (19) 14 5 0.737
    Houston Astros (7) 4 3 0.571
    Kansas City Royals (19) 14 5 0.737
    Los Angeles Angels (6) 5 1 0.833
    Miami Marlins (3) 2 1 0.667
    Milwaukee Brewers (4) 2 2 0.500
    New York Mets (4) 1 3 0.250
    New York Yankees (6) 2 4 0.333
    Oakland Athletics (7) 3 4 0.429
    Philadelphia Phillies (3) 1 2 0.333
    Seattle Mariners (7) 5 2 0.714
    Tampa Bay Rays (7) 5 2 0.714
    Texas Rangers (7) 6 1 0.857
    Toronto Blue Jays (7) 4 3 0.571
    Washington Nationals (3) 1 2 0.333

    Let's continue on... deeper into the 2019 playoffs. We lost... the Yankees advance. They didn't get past the Astros and the Astros lost to the Nationals who were 6 games below .500 in Mid-June. 

    Bottom Line: 

    The playoffs are a small sample size, the 0-18 streak is a small sample size followed by a small sample size. It still hurts nonetheless but the streak was yesterday. Tomorrow is indeed a new day. We are right now 0-0 in future playoffs. 

    I think we should add offense at the trade deadline. There are some who think we should sell. 

    I think we should add offense because it helps us MAKE the playoffs not because the additions are going to necessarily help us win in the small sample size of the playoffs. Hopefully the additions improve our chances in the playoffs but I want to add to help us make the playoffs. 

    For those who think we should sell... I can respect the reasoning that the team could sell Sonny Gray, get some decent players in return for the future, still make the playoffs and could still do well in the playoffs. I can't argue that point... I disagree because I think we should add offense but I can't argue that point. 

    But for those who think we should sell because they think this team has NO CHANCE in the playoffs. I can't respect that. I won't respect that. I don't know, you don't know, the front office doesn't know and the individual players don't know. 

    If you could tell me how Joe Mauer was going to perform in the playoffs in 2006, 2009 and 2010... Maybe I'll listen. 




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...