Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Did We Just Witness Jeremy Zoll Implement a Change in Roster Construction Philosophy?

    The Minnesota Twins release of veteran relievers Liam Hendriks and Andrew Chafin may seem troubling on the surface. Is it actually the sign of better roster decision-making?

    Nate Palmer
    Image courtesy of Nathan Ray Seebeck-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    As the Minnesota Twins gear up for their season opener in Baltimore, the major-league roster continues to be trimmed down to its appropriate 26-player size. Friday, two recognizable veteran relievers, Andrew Chafin and Liam Hendriks, were granted their release after being informed they wouldn't make the team.

    Considering the depleted state of the Twins bullpen after the trade deadline sell-off, this seems like a strange move and one that should invoke panic. It may instead be the exact opposite: a move that signals a lesson learned from past roster mistakes. 

    Hendriks, at the outset of camp, was a leading candidate to be the top right-hander at the back end of the bullpen, vying for save opportunities. Coming off injuries and a cancer battle, the Twins needed to see Hendriks regain form closer to his 2022 self. While Hendriks was able to ramp up to the mid-90s in velocity, general manager Jeremy Zoll stated they didn’t see the consistency they had hoped to from their reliever. 

    The most recent of those inconsistencies was on display Thursday evening as the Twins visited the Red Sox. Hendriks, in his one inning of work, gave up two hits, two walks, threw a wild pitch, and allowed one run. Evidenced by his release the next day, it was not what the Twins and Zoll were looking for in the veteran. 

     

    Chafin came to the Twins with a similar good veteran track record, offering continued hope for the rebuilding bullpen. When the left-hander was at his peak of success, he was able to throw 93 mph with his sinker. As Chafin worked through spring, he was never able to touch 90 mph and sat at only 86 mph in Monday’s outing. It's a continued negative trend from his 89 mph average in 2025. 

    Moving on from those two veterans represents a shift from what we have traditionally seen from the Twins. The club is giving a chance to an unproven group that may have upside, rather than potentially watching some name-worthy veterans continue to trend in the wrong direction. This means that now the likes of Cole Sands, Zak Kent, Eric Orze, Dan Altavilla, Matt Bowman, Trent Baker, and Cody Laweryson will have a shot at being the arms that rebuild the Twins bullpen. 

    It may be too early to call this a full-on change in philosophy, but it is a positive sign that there may be one in process. Twins fans have had to endure watching the Twins hang onto veterans of the likes of Joey Gallo way beyond their usefulness. Instead, we will get to see if one of these low-wattage additions can have the sort of success the team desperately needs for the sake of the bullpen. It should be a welcome change from the post-deadline stretch in 2025 when veteran placeholders got most of the innings rather than anyone with much future potential. 

    It wasn’t too long ago that the Twins had both Danny Coulombe and Jeff Hoffman in camp and released them just before they had great success elsewhere. While Derek Falvey is gone, others like Zoll have been part of a leadership that has been able to identify good arms, but hasn't held onto them long enough. Just a fraction of that sort of success from one of the group of relievers still in camp would be great development for the 2026 roster. 

    If this is a true signal of a renewed willingness to move on from veterans sooner rather than later, it could be a significant advantage on the positional side as well. Right now, the Twins will have an exciting group of outfield prospects in St. Paul to start the season, including Emmanuel Rodriguez, Gabriel Gonzelez, and Walker Jenkins. If the likes of James Outman or Trevor Larnach struggle out of the gate, fans can be hopeful that a Zoll-led front office may be willing to move on with appropriate timing, paving the way for this exciting group of prospects ready to hit the majors. 

    What do you think? Did the Twins make a grave mistake by letting go of two proven veterans, or do you have faith that this is a sign that the tide is turning in Minnesota in how the front office handles veterans? 

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    5 minutes ago, chpettit19 said:

    Yes, people have things they stick to. I'm positive you are going to be bringing up Bader for years.

    When you're as wrong as you were, from the moment the ink was laid down on that paper, you kind of bring it on yourself. 

    You were the number 1 cheerleader against that signing, and I still don't think you really understand why you were so wrong about it. 

    7 minutes ago, NYCTK said:

    A lot of people here seem not to understand every contending team carries old vets that are only expected to get 2 games a week and fill in when holes open up. 

    The obvious example is the Twins fans complaining about Ty France, only for Ty France to go to the Blue Jays where he made the World series roster. 

    And sometimes, when you so completely misunderstand MLB rosters you fight against signings like that of Harrison Bader and you show you don't know ball. 

    Those vets tend to be usable players, not an albatross actively dragging the lineup down, unless of course, you're the Twins. 

    Dude, this one was already covered. Toronto played 18 postseason games. Ty France had 4 PAs and didn't start a single game. I mean c'mon....

    Ah, we "don't know ball." Well, from my vantage point it looks like you've back yourself into a corner and the only way out is revisionist history and I guess claiming everyone else is too stupid to grasp the 4D chess that has been the Twins roster management. YMMV of course. 

    11 minutes ago, NYCTK said:

    When you're as wrong as you were, from the moment the ink was laid down on that paper, you kind of bring it on yourself. 

    You were the number 1 cheerleader against that signing, and I still don't think you really understand why you were so wrong about it. 

    Except I was right about everything outside of him having a career year offensively. You're still trying to stick to the idea that he was brought in as a 4th outfielder. Shoot, a couple comments up you suggest Gallo was an $11 million 4th outfielder/backup 1B. I was 100% right that he was brought in as an everyday OF and fully acknowledged from the jump that his defense was top notch. He figured out his offense and made it a great signing. I have no problem admitting that or taking heat for my stance that he wouldn't be good enough to fill the everyday role he was brought in for. Wasn't the first time I was wrong and won't be the last.

    The difference is, even with hindsight and multiple people providing you undeniable evidence, you are continuing to be wrong about Gallo. If Bader had been signed as a 4th OFer, or France as a bench bat, I wouldn't have had any problem with either signing. I am on here all the time defending depth signings. But I will complain about every Bader and France as everyday players signing from now until I die. They are bad moves, even if some turn out surprisingly well. You're a Mets fan who liked Bader and have continued to claim he was signed as a 4th outfielder despite him saying he was signed as a starter before the season and him playing as a starter from the jump. The absolute refusal to acknowledge things even after the fact is what separates us. But, hey, you do you, my friend.

    25 minutes ago, NYCTK said:

    A lot of people here seem not to understand every contending team carries old vets that are only expected to get 2 games a week and fill in when holes open up. 

    The obvious example is the Twins fans complaining about Ty France, only for Ty France to go to the Blue Jays where he made the World series roster. 

    And sometimes, when you so completely misunderstand MLB rosters you fight against signings like that of Harrison Bader and you show you don't know ball. 

    Thank you for proving our point. Teams carry those vets to play 2 games a week. The Twins sign them to start every day. Ty France was the Twins everyday 1B. He wasn't here to play twice a week and Rocco said as much in February. Harrison Bader was signed to play every day. He wasn't here to play twice a week and he said as much during the offseason. Joey Gallo wasn't signed for $11 million to play twice a week. Kody Clemens was waived by the Phillies and became an everyday starter for the Twins. The Twins are not treating these guys like contending teams treat them. That is the point. That is our complaint.

    The fact that you can't see the difference says all we need to know. You are the one who has a narrative they refuse to give up despite ample undeniable evidence, including the team and players themselves stating the opposite. And despite you pointing out yourself that these types of signings aren't meant to be opening day starters. You're arguing our point back to us but somehow think we're the ones who don't understand the difference between how the Twins have built their team the last handful of years vs actual contending teams. Some of the most impressive mental gymnastics I've seen around here in a while.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...