Castro's career CS % is 27%. Suzuki's is 24%. Keep in mind, Suzuki is older. Point being, Castro's might be lower when he is two years older than he is now. And I think we can stop talking about the influence Castro is having on the pitching staff. They all look about the same to me except Santana, who did just fine without Castro last year and Berrios - which could very easily be simple maturation due to age and experience. Santiago isn't better. Gibson isn't. Belisle isn't. Pressly isn't. Breslow isn't. Kintzler isn't. Rogers maybe a tiny bit. Duffey, ok. But how much of that is Castro and how much is his different role?