Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

nicksaviking

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    24,977
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    126

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by nicksaviking

  1. It seems this game should cause a lot less regret this year. Those names aren't nearly as impressive as they used to be. Previous years of the "Where are they now" game have featured some stat lines that have made us curl up and cry.
  2. I just think there are very few great catchers; I'm sure plenty are available for the right price. I can't think of an exciting catcher other than Buser Posey, it seems to be the only position in baseball right now where the best players are past or near 30-years-old. Maybe the Cubs found something in Kyle Schwarber, if he sticks. Sounds like that's a big if though.
  3. I'd like to see those studies if you can find them. I think it's also kind of strange we measure workload by innings for youngsters when we measure workload by pitches during a game. No doubt that the average number of pitches Alex Meyer throws in an inning is going to be higher than Berrios.
  4. In theory I agree, as six to seven starts don't seem like a lot, but I think if he did get those starts and he was pitching well we might feel different in a months time. Hypothetically, if he came up and his six starts looked like Noah Syndergaard, Jose Fernandez or Matt Harvey's first six starts, most of us would probably be asking for him to be pitching the important games. I'd have to think that if Tyler Duffy pitches like he has his past couple starts, he'd also get consideration after only 10-11 starts. Of course this would have just as much to do with the blase nature of the rest of the staff. There wouldn't be any kind of discussion if there was a clear leader in the rotation.
  5. Can't imagine Ryan was in the stands simply because he was in the area. The team is clearly considering calling him up and if they were on the fence about it and last night was an audition, one would have to think he passed. Who gets replaced then, Santana or Gibson? Santana has no post season value, but Gibson has looked like he's wearing down. I don't think I like the six man rotation as Milone is a low effort lefty who shouldn't need more rest and the extra day has always seemed to be a problem with sinkerballers and Pelfrey has suddenly refound his form.
  6. There's a difference between not playing the outfield well and not playing it at all. If the Twins are going to consider moving Arcia, they're going to have to put him back out there. If the Twins don't show a willingness to put him in the OF they'll get nothing for him.
  7. Man, that article just brings up more questions! A Norway-based scout? That has to be pretty unique. The leauge has a page in the Internation Baseball Federation website though: http://www.ibaf.org/en/nation/04110913-dbbd-4066-be73-e130a4d8b3e3 "Winningest team in the adult league is Oslo Pretenders, with 16 Series Championships and 18 National Championships." The Oslo Pretenders website: http://www.oslopretenders.com/#!player-profiles/cam6 Not sure that there's many guys on that roster that looks like they're under 35, and I'd love to hear the story that brought the team the Japanese player. Hopefully the scout is now a German-based or perhaps Netherlands-based scout.
  8. Holy. Crap. I've been critical of the scouting and development many times, but I'd like to find out who in particular in the organization saw Kepler as a 16-year-old swinging like he was taking a crap mid-pivot and realized they could turn that into a useful ballplayer. Well done fellas, well done.
  9. I know it's not cut and dry who the Twins best starter was prior to May's demotion, but he was the best strikeout pitcher, he was the second best at limiting walks (and still one of the best in the league) and the second best at limiting HR. To me he looked like the best of the bunch, and at the very least he had the potential to become the best starter by season's end. I would think most team's best starter would also look good in the bullpen. No doubt Clayton Kershaw could be the best closer in the game should the Dodgers choose to put him back there.
  10. Yes Boras clients usually like to hit free agency, but not always. But this seems like even more of a reason to do it soon, because if a Boras client like Bryant actually does take a pre-arb extension, it's almost certainly going to be outlandish.
  11. One variable we should probably also consider is that Miguel Sano looks like he might have a pretty similar contemporary in Kris Bryant. Bryant is represented by Scott Boras and plays for the big pocketed Chicago Cubs. It may behoove the Twins to work out a deal with Sano first as the Cubs have a lot more room to offer a cartoonish contract.
  12. I really thought Jay would be given multiple innings, even while pitching out of relief. Man, he's going to take a long time to stretch out and get to a respectable innings workload, he's going to have to be on the same schedule as the guys they draft as HS starters. Levi Michael's .801 OPS is looking optimistic. It feels a little hallow though as he really doesn't appear to be more than average at any particular thing, save perhaps for taking a walk. 9 2B, 5 3B and 4 HR in 181 AB I guess can equal a .437 SLG, but it sure doesn't feel very impressive. Sometimes boring ballplayers turn into sneaky good ballplayers.
  13. Yeah, I was very impressed and excited watching that. I agree with Parker though, the surprise may wear off quickly, I think we even saw it late in the game, while half the Orioles were still chasing the curve, a few of them had caught on. To keep this up, he's probably going to have to be a little less predictable about when the pitch is coming, and he's probably going to have to miss closer to the zone. If the book on you is that you have a good curve, at some point teams are going to drill into their players that if it's coming in low, lay off. Those swings at pitches in the dirt won't consistantly be there once teams wise up. These seem like fairly easily adjustments though, if they are needed.
  14. We say that now, but are they any different than Edwin Jackson? This time next year when Nolasco's deal is down to a year and change, I'm guessing there will be plenty of thought going into DFA'ing him if he still has a 5+ ERA and no other team will come near him. And this time in 2017 there would be no doubt he'd be DFA'd under these same circumstances.
  15. And with the PED era in the rearview mirror (knock on wood) teams realized the foolishness in giving these monster contracts to players in their mid-30s.
  16. Jose Tabata and Starlin Castro. Again, just off the top of my head though. Still, I'd rather crap out on a deal like this to a youngster than a veteran. I'd guess the Cubs have a better chance of moving Castro and his ugly contract than the Twins do of moving Hughes, Santana or Mauer. (Not to praise the Cubs, they found it just as difficult to move Edwin Jackson)
  17. In the 1st? Where they drawing the lineup out of a hat? Unless the Rochester lineup is so stacked that Vargas has to bat at the bottom of the order, this seems like a highly unusual lineup construction.
  18. Jedd Gyorko, Dontrelle Willis and the Twins very own Joe Mays come to mind. I'd do the deal, though I'd feel a lot more comfortable with the risk if the team wasn't already on the hook for Santana, Hughes, Nolasco, Suzuki and Mauer for what seems like an eternity. Fortunately if Sano were to bust, he should still have options for the duration of most of those contracts. Do Sano, do Buxton, Berrios, May, Rosario, Hicks or whoever else looks like a good gamble in the next couple years, just no more long term deals to vets.
  19. It's not the money, it's the roster spots. I don't care about signings, I care that the best players for now and/or the future won't or perhaps already haven't gotten on to the field because of these long term deals. If Hughes or Santana pitched as poorly as they have and had Pelfrey's contract they'd already be in the pen, traded or DFA'd.
  20. Aside from May's botched BP experience, I think Pressly was by far the 2nd best option in the pen this year. Edit: I feel confident enough after looking at the stats that I will strike this part from my statement.
  21. Yes, finding a star is remote with the Rule V, however is that the bar to set? Shouldn't the goal simply to upgrade either now or the future? Even with last night, Graham has yet to be the worst guy in the bullpen one time this year, and before he got hurt, Pressly was the only guy aside from Perkins that I had any interest in keeping. Neither guy is exciting, but I'd rather have them than the rest of the circus.
×
×
  • Create New...