Jump to content
Can the Twins win a baseball game? Join our game thread! ×
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Rosterman

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    6,698

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Rosterman

  1. Rosterman
    At this point, would say goodbye to HUGHES and Sanchez. Too bad they can't write-off Huges salary under last year's profits. Of course, there is still disabled list possibilities. Or do the Twins cut bait with Vargas now. I would almsot rather see the Twins keep Slegers (and Mejia) as next in line starters than Hughes or Sanchez. Not to mention that we have Jorge, Romero and Gonsalves in the near wings.
  2. Rosterman
    The Twins could save money by cutting Grossman. Yet he is better suited for the bench, at the moment, than say Granite...who should be getting play in the outfield rather than sitting on the bench, if push comes to shove.
  3. Rosterman
    Right now, you lose two: the Draft Pick AND removal of someone from the 40-man, if not named Sanchez or Vargas. I would love to see a reasonable ($20 for two years isn't totally reasonable) with an option on a third year tied to performance.
  4. Rosterman
    The Twins badly need a 5th starter, and a temporary 4th. I could see them jettisoning Mejia to the minors, not keeping Sanchez, putting Hughes in as a temp 4th, and opening the seson with Duffey so they can keep Kinley in the bullpen and make the decision when Santana returns for a larger pitching staff vs. shorter bench. I also wonder about catcher...would Garver be best ssrved catching on a regular basis with the rotation of the future for a portion of the season at Rochester, being the first to be called up. Thus, Wilson or someone else as backup. Want to assume that at least two 40-man spots will open up, one from Vargas, the other possibly Sanchez. So the Twins will have at least one "musical chairs" spot. Of course, Aybar makes it if Sano is disabled, and then the Twins need to settle on two of the three guys on the roster for infielder/bench bat come Santana's return. Would still like to see the Twins add one of the Big Three starter free agents. But time is running out for season prep.
  5. Rosterman
    I'm confused with the lowball offer. Unless Lynn isn't receiving anything near that from other clubs. I would expect his price to be a bit higher, and at least a 2-year offer more towards $25-30 million with a third-year option. But maybe...he just isn't worth it. I mean, Jamie Garcia ALMOST got that much per year. You do have to look at the bigger picture. You lose a draft pick (these guys refused a qualifying offer of an outrageous salary for a season), plus you more than likely ALSO lose a player that you remove from your 40-man roster, in exchange for a known commodity who may/may not produce as expected in your home field.
  6. Rosterman
    It's tough. Chances are you would move beyond Dozier at second base. So, how would he fit in longterm. 1B? DH? But you have the Sano issue for DH. And we saw how easy it might be to get a comparable guy for first. So Dozier will be aging and entering a free agent market. Considering he didn't draw alot of interest with a easonable contract in the past two trade markets that he was dangled for pitching, he could be in trouble. Of course, a fantastic 2018 would draw interest. So he will be playing hard...maybe too hard...in 2018. This will be the season that we see how the current group deals with institutions -- Mauer and Dozidr. How they deal with players like Hughes and Gibson. Do they sign some players to longterm contracts (Buxton) and not others (Kepler, Rosario. I'm sure the Twins and Dozier could reacha deal, but I doubt that he would take less than $30 million over 3 years, at this point. But another year of wear-and-tear might prove fruitful to both parties. But unless the Twins are going to give a qualifying offer, then he IS tradebait and they should be prepared to move on during the season, if they are "just on the fringe of contention" and if Polanco can play second and Gordon proves ready for mid-season callup.
  7. Rosterman
    The twins sold a lot of full price tickets because of their success last year. So, they aren't hurting. Winning puts butts in the seats. Establishing some player stars helps with promotions. And, people comign to games means more ad revenue, plus concessions and such. Plus, the ahrd reality is that they SHOULD be able to spend upwards of $150 million and not suffer, especially in a weak division. The rotation is still a shambles, with a couple of low price fixes that is absically throwing money to the wind (the bounce back of Hughes, the rebirth of Sanchez, the promise of May). May promises Santana's return, but the twins are still one short of a full cup of solid arms. Time to cut the bait and get on with going forwards. The rookies are still a half-season away, and maybe ready for short game callups. Slegers and Mejia are in the wings, but only as short-term probables. Next year you may lose someone, and then work Pineada into the mix. But the Twins are NOT losing money. Plus, their part of the stadium is almost (if not) paid off.
  8. Rosterman
    Well, at today's prices, he would probably eclipse $25 million over three years if he plays well. So that is the chance you take. Do you go 4 with an option year (pushing him towards year 30). Can you do it, for say, $26 million and what is the option year...$10...$15? Who is in the pipeline? The Twins have an abundance of shortstops. Would Kiriloff be the future in 2-3 years? Is Royce Lewis an outfield fixture in that time? I'm sure there are a couple of more names to nady around for the corner spots. Do you also TRY and do Sano? What one guy signs for will relfect what others get. How do Kepler and Rosario fit into longterm plans. It seems the new front office will be cautionary when spending monies, along the line of you don't have to obverpay...because players will be there, and if you develop the system right, the pipeline could feed you.
  9. Rosterman
    In some ways, just eating the salary for Hughes and moving on is better than trying to get some, any, value from the guy. Too bad too late to write-off Hughes on last year's books. And then look at Hughes salary and Sanchez salary and you CAN get a $20 million a year guy, probably two years of one. But the Twins do need a 4th starter. They are out there (free agents not signed who can predictably produce, rather than chance or remakes). The roster will fill up quickly at Rochester, not just the rotation, but also the bullpen (who will be closing down there). My bigger concern is when/if Gonsalves, Romero or Jorge will be ready to compete. I almost want to see Duffey as the 5th starter and see what we have in Kinley.
  10. Rosterman
    They should've taken a qualifying offer....but still, the chance loomed that they would get a multi-year deal for 2 or 3 times (or more) the money. That is the rub, it is all about the ULTIMATE amount of money. You don't sign for $17 million because you might get $25 or $38 or something million guaranteed. Who knows what might happen to you after a season (injury is the biggest fear). It's a gamble. And when a team makes a qualifying offer, it is part reward for past services, and part protection that you will get something BACK for the player if they do walk.
  11. Rosterman
    Yes, and it should've been Ervin Santana in the wild card game, especially given the early lead. He performed that role for the Twins in 2016 AND 2017, sadly losing many a low-scoring game or to the bullpen, that would ruffle the feathers of many a player overtime. And, as the recent free agent marketplace showed, none of the Big Four was really that shutdown ace, although Davish has the potential, but maybe not the overall poise. True longterm Aces are few and far between. Some have moments, but gew have careers...which is why it was nice to see Jack Morris rewarded for his fine work with the Hall of Fame. He was an ACE, albeit one with solid run production being his efforts. But also a workhorse.
  12. Rosterman
    Hughes pitched poorly inhis latest start. Maybe he glared at the umpire on his way to the dugout, and it was windy, but that didn't account for some of the pitchers who did just fine against the B-squad, so to speak. At some point, you MUST cut and run. It's a big chunk of change to swallow. But you are losing even more if the production, for your team, doesn't happen.
  13. Rosterman
    Money-wise, Vargas' best bet would be foreign ball to establish his credentials a bit more. If someone wants him, they will start to swing a deal now. But they would need that 40-man roster space open and be prepared to keep him on their own roster. Grossman is another story. Do you want him or Granite? Do you want the bench bat, or the runner/defender? Of course, Aybar is purely around because of the possible need of a temporary Sano replacement. That's not to say that Escobar won't start at third. Like Sanchez...he's here until Santana returns, or Hughes implodes, if he doesn't implode first. And we still would have Mejia and Slegers as backup (or maybe Duffey). But Vargas....again, salary wise he would look good to find a job in the Far East!
  14. Rosterman
    I'd love to see Buxton hold down the leadoff spot, and Dozier bat third. Sadly, I would like it better if I knew that Mauer/Dozier would still be on the team come next season. But both need to produce to keep free agent drms alive, and I can't think of two better players to get the msot at bats in the lineup. With a middle of Sano/Morrison and Rosario, the Twins have quite a punch. And then the end of the lineup with Kepler/Castro and Polanco looks pretty darn good. Let's see: a bench of Wilson or Garver, Escobar, Grossman and one other guy. I can live with that.
  15. Rosterman
    Sadly, you can't cut any of the guys added to the 40-man during the off-season. By the end of spring training, yes. And the Twins saw more worth in Enns and Slegers than Chargois for the moment...and I'm sure either of those would be claimed if put on the waiver wire.
  16. Rosterman
    They still could cut a Rodney. They might go with one less bat. Or they might add one if Sano faces suspension. Don't count out Bobby Wilson with Garver returning to work with some future pitches fulltime behind the plate at Rochester. If Hughes isn't producing, walk away from the contract, folks. Anyways, the Twins will face a situation when Santana returns. Of course, could they still sign one of the unsigned three?
  17. Rosterman
    Still remember back when we traded a guy named Eddie Morlan to the Rays (instead of Juan Rincon). Minor leagues are a crap shoot. Look at the guys named above and then go see where they fall on the Top Prospect lists of their new teams. Yes, Burdi may come back to haunt.....but don't see any superstars there. Nothing that won't be replacable by other arriving prospects.
  18. Rosterman
    The joy then is that Dozier is one of many players who should have a dynamite season: Santana, Gibson, Rodney, Mauer, Escobar, Duke...if they ant to cash in on the free agent market. And, they could also be trade bait if the Twins suffer and die come July. Considering the free agent marketplace for many guys this year, I don't see Dozier being a longterm second baseman for any team...where would you slot him if not at 2nd...thid base or first base, or a DH. But then we saw what kind of money Logan Morrison got this year.
  19. Rosterman
    Sano not here for the long haul? You never know. Still, having Morrison as a bench bat, too, when someone else is the DH is intriguing. And Mauer doesn't have to DH all-the-time when NOT playing first, thus you have another strong bench bat for a dozen or so games. The question is still the rotation...can they give you six innings or more consistently, then you can stick with a 7-man pen and have more play in the field.
  20. Rosterman
    People say it would be ahrd to play Sano at DH. Logan makes sense as a DH and also a bench bat, and someone to spell Mauer, who could then also be a bench bat. Overall, a decent signing...but the Twins might NOW need to carry only 12 pitchers rather than 13.
  21. Rosterman
    Though he is NOT the right-handed bat the Twins were seeking, he is an upgrade at DH and a capable backup at first, plus an option if the Twins don't resign Mauer. Question is: Where does Kennys Vargas go? And, do the Twins go with Granite or Grossman as the spare outfielder. Of course, looks like the Twins will probably give away someone from their roster. And does this mean that the front office has faith that PHIL HUGHES will break the rotation and there is no need for an additional starting pitcher acquisition? Better signing than Napoli, fer sure, at least on paper. I do hope the Twins bring the BEST players north. None of this out-of-options we must keep, Rule 5 pickup need to keep, aging veteran should stay in place of rookie kinda stuff. On another note, Matt Belisle signed with Cleveland and Francisco Liriano with Detroit!
  22. Rosterman
    The Dodgers saw enough in Chargois to add him to the 40-man. That visit could be short-lived. Watch the Dodgers to pass him thru waivers and send him to the minors considering 27 other teams passed on Chargois.
  23. Rosterman
    They al;so traded for Dietrich Enns, Tyler Watson, Gabriel Moya and Zach Litell. All four should contribue in some way to the team.
  24. Rosterman
    I think a lot will hinge on what happens with the Sano case. Would the Twins rather have a moment of experience on the bench? Right now, they have TOO MANY minor league free agents stop-gapping the way for prospects at Rochester. Will see how spring training shakes out. Considering the Twins have 14 players on their 40-man and at least 13 expected to make the club.
  25. Rosterman
    The Lynn price would have to match the qualifying offer, or he would have egg on his face. And 2-3 years would be a better fit than 4 or more. Of course, you sign a multi-year contract with a bonus takes away some of the shame of signing below what the Cardinals would've been forced to pay you. I'm starting to see the "qualifying offer" like arbitration...a way a player can get overpaid (and a gamble for the offering team that the player will accept) or they enter the marketplace and take a cut in salary. How many players aren't offered arbitration because they have become too expensive. How many players need to take the qualifying offer, because they may not be that good to get...then and now...a bigger long-term contract.
×
×
  • Create New...