I agree that I like almost everything Nick writes, even though I don't always agree with him. But I think to say the criticism is unfair is a bit harsh. I mean, if someone wrote the opposite about Hicks after three games we'd be crying small sample size, too. (In fact, Nick is in the opposite side of the Correia thread). Throw in the inherent bias (we know Nick was pulling pretty hard for them to start Hicks) and I think the pushback isn't surprising. On the other hand, Nick's been honest of his criticism of Hicks (last night's called third strike), too, and some here are just focused being overly and continuously critical. I do hope he's right about Hicks, though.