So the "$200k in each of the five years after 2016" isn't a sure thing after all? That was your hypothetical, not mine. To get back to something baseball related, I stand by my earlier opinion...if the Twins are going to trade one of their best assets this winter, they need to get something in return that will provide equal or greater value to the major league team starting on opening day in 2016. I'm not at all interested in weakening the 2016 team for potential gain years down the road. Not to mention a player(s) who is on the field in 2016 can still be there in subsequent years.