Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    48,925
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    340

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. I fly in tomorrow. Can't wait, even if it isn't the VORTEX, it's still too cold for me.... zero for the dang high.....
  2. Huh, I thought there was one FA in 87, but I could be off on that. You recall the trades? And, I'm aware Morris and Davis came off bad years, but they did sign them, and it did work.
  3. It's moot now. The Twins did not trade for him. Philly did. Now Philly will sign Harper or Machado most likely. Neither move might work out.....but at least they are trying to win. The fact that the Twins won't sign 25/6 year old generational talents until they are the last piece, well.....
  4. Heck, Congress keeps passing LAWS that allow them to operate in ways no other businesses can, including possibly allowing minor league players to be barely paid........And taxpayers keep handing them money for stadiums and parking and and and.
  5. I don't agree. I think they can make money and be good. It's a matter of how much money..... That's my issue. When they are competitive, or close, will they spend? Last year they spent a lot. But they were all short term investments, which were lauded for their efficiency. I want wins when they look good. They looked legit, sort of, after 17. They went half in. Turns out, somewhat due to injuries, they were right. Until they act differently, they are the Twins. A team that has only spent big in free agency twice. Coincidentally, those are the championship years....
  6. I agree that it is more risky to sign free agents early in the process. After 2017, it looked like Buxton was legit. That was when I wanted Realmuto. Buxton got hurt, showing that even young position players carry risk. Had Buxton and Sano been healthy, and Dozier produced, having a legit pitcher and Realmuto may have been enough. Not likely, but we won't know. If those two are healthy and great this year, they will have almost no pitching under contract in 20. While it looks like there will be plenty available, someone will get hurt. Someone will get extended. Everyone will be a risk. I hope they take that risk if the core plays to it's potential
  7. Two years vs three (or four) is a huge delta in the context of this team (and even w/o context). I don't think I do it, unless they also deal for a legit SP. Or something. Three years seems like an investment, two more like going for it.
  8. Like the Yankees with Ellsbury (I was totally wrong about that one! but it also shows that even position players are risky).
  9. That's a lot to give up for 2 years of Realmuto.
  10. I'd go with Mejia or Romero. But that's just liking the person I have less data on...... They themselves said that one reason they aren't signing certain players is because you only sign those when they are the last hole....implying to me, at least, they are not playing for the present.
  11. I've never said build thru FA or trades. I've asked them to add one player they think is great, and one player just below that. Two players. Not a build.
  12. this is a fan board, not a place of work......I think you miss that distinction here.
  13. What's your argument, at the end? Don't spend any money, and make money on tv and radio and revenue sharing (the disconnect between attendance and profit has never been greater, according to several studies on line)? Is there some minimum they can spend, and still make money? Never invest in better players? Is there no obligation to spend, given that the taxpayers subsidize their business? And, NO ONE is saying that the Twins shouldn't treat this like a business. No one. The delta in opinion is about how much money they make, vs how much they try to win. They aren't losing money.
  14. Isn't that Mejia and Stewart?
  15. Despite having Buxton, Rosario, Kepler, Cave, Wade, Reed, Kirilloff, Lanarch, Badoo, and more, and OF always being available in FA.... The team needs to be taking chances on pitchers. Imo. They literally have Berrios and, um, no one else proven, under control past this year. And the RP corps isn't in much better shape.
  16. Moving and shifting in baseball is more boring than football. Plus, you can't really see it.
  17. Wins? Really? Wins are a team stat. I mean, would you rather add a player that gave up 5 runs a game, but played with the best offense, or a player that gave up 2 runs a game and played with the Mets..... Darvish got hurt. If Perez now gets hurt, will it be a bad signing because he doesn't get wins?
  18. Of course, we get three angles of replays, so it seems like there is action...... But, sit at a game? Awful for pace of play......
  19. I'd rather teams had a pool of money to spend, and they can bid using that pool. Drafts are inherently bad for player income.
  20. I'm sure tv would keep paying the same... This just isn't realistic at all.
×
×
  • Create New...