Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    48,919
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    340

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. If they are not going to even try to compete this year, they should deal him. Ideally they would pay nearly the whole salary and get a good prospect.
  2. Regrets or not, those are not words to fire up the fanbase with excitement.....
  3. Even from when? Certainly not even from last year's number.....nor the year before.
  4. I do not secretly like that they are frugal.
  5. Well, the last time the owners did that they were sued for collusion and lost. And, if you don't want to play in the market, then you should sell your team, because this is the price, Mr. Owner....
  6. Just curious, there is already a thread on this. Why not comment there?
  7. Short sighted? How are attendance concerns not relevant at all? That said, I would consider the trade, because it isn't my reputation and money on the line....
  8. So just signing him to put a competitive team on the field is a bad idea?
  9. I have kind of given up at this point....still hoping to he wrong.....
  10. How does Punto help the future at all? Would it not be better to play the younger players, and see if they are good or not....not for a week, only to be replaced by an older guy, but for months? It certainly appears they are not trying to compete this year....still hoping to be wrong....
  11. Did no one read the part where I said the precise definition is debatable? Not sure how I could have made that more clear. I have completely lost interest in this topic.....
  12. Um, I was not, and never would, talk about pitcher wins. I thought it was clear I was talking about the likelihood a team wins. Does not really matter anyway.
  13. With all the AAAA arms in Rochester, what AA guy could even get promoted?
  14. While I do not always agree with Gardys tactical decisions, he must do something well because the team has generally been successful with him here. I believe with a bench coach to help temper a few decisions that he can be a successful manager again.
  15. Ugly list, not made better by adding more names. I had hoped with the money freed up the last two years, Blackburn and probably morneau coming off the books next year, and 25 million in new revenue next year, things would change.....still hoping....
  16. But you get wins in 30 game increments, Brock. Some days a player or team is just off. Mashing all innings together in one number ignores that games are discrete events. I would rather a guy give up 3 runs every start, than 2 some starts, and 4 some starts. Era does not take that into account. QS is not perfect, but it is informative, imo.
  17. So people still think they will fix all their holes next year, and should not start now? Can you explain how you think that might work? Can you explain how signing a second tier starter for 3-4 years does not help 2014?
  18. I find it depressing the Clevelands got Bauer...he is a better prospect than any the Twins got.
  19. I love the quality start stat. What matters for a start is did you give your team a good chance to win or not. Much better than ERA which blends every start together. Now, whether or not the precise definition is correct can he debated, but I find the stat highly useful for assessing performance.
  20. We'll get a chance to see how good Bauer is up close and personal now (well, those that buy tickets will).
  21. Bauer? Um, he's a much better prospect than any the Twins got in the last two trades, from what I've read. Don't know anything about anyone but Choo in the deal though...
  22. So because the offense sucks, maybe, they should not try to get good pitching?
  23. Probably semantics mostly at this point....yes.
  24. Cdog, if you are racing in the Indy 500, yes, spending 50k on a bad car is cheap. The signing has to be in context of the Twins needs and the market. This signing is bad primarily for the length. If this is fixing the rotation, then it is cheap. If they now sign 2 legit pitchers, this isn't cheap, it is just likely a bad deal.
×
×
  • Create New...