A well regulated militia being necessary....blah, blah, blah. do we still believe a militia is necessary, or is the premise right there wrong? And, if we believe gun carriers should be part of a militia....why aren't they required to be part of one? or is that not actually part of the bill of rights, and I dreamed it? I'm sorry, but over 200 years ago, things were different. The entire premise is not valid any more, not in the US or any other first world country. Also, the weapons are completely different. I guess I would ask why it is ok to ban nuclear weapons or biological weapons, but not guns? btw, I don't want to ban guns, but this idea that they will somehow something you when the government does something they will never do? I think that's pretty funny at this point in our development, both politically, and technologically.