they are literally 2 different measurements. Their disagreement discredits neither. Is scoring in archer wrong, if one tournament measures the number of bulsseyes, and one measures how close to bullseye for the winner? Of course not.
not that htey "had no choice". No one said that. I think "encouraged" would be the word. Or "accepted". I don't know if I believe that or not, but it isn't pure BS, is it? Fans, especially some fans, think they are "part of the team", and that yelling at the opposition is helping the home team. I don't see anyone excusing racist behavior at all. Point that out to me......
No, as I said above, I don't watch the games, hence why I asked the question above. And, yes, you and Brock said the same thing. He's doing a better job of not swinging when he shouldn't. Which, btw, is great!
right. One says "we value X when looking at defense". One says "we value Y when looking at defense". It doesn't make their similarly named stats "wrong". It says they value different measures of variance. Just like some people like OPS and some like BA.......doesn't make either measure "wrong".
Rather than copy every question..... A ton of draft questions in here, some certainly relevant to the 2nd and 3rd picks of your favorite team: http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/eric-longenhagen-prospects-chat-52/
Heh, at the risk of quoting myself, and looking even more like a self centered..... Is that a quote bubble by his head in the background? What does everyone think it says?
GoDucks 1:06 Has David Peterson surpassed Seth Romero as the best college lefty available in the draft? Eric A Longenhagen 1:07 After McKay, I assume? Probably depends on how clubs view Romero's off-field issues. On stuff? No.
That's fair, to question the precision of the measurement. but to say that the average fan can eyeball pretty much only the plays in the games of her favorite team's games, and somehow be able to compare Sano to every other 3Bin the game seems more off to me.
That's why I love them. If they can stop Amazon from besting them, it's hard to see them ever losing this space. which is only going to grow. to be clear, eventually every company loses.....I just don't think this happens anytime soon.
I can't say strongly enough how much I believe in this company. Great plan. Long term play. Amazon has been unable to beat them, when they take everyone else down.
Ha, no, I totally meant Berrios! Sigh. No one has ever put up that number in a full season. My issue isn't the valuation of defense, thought I do have questions about it. It's that it's really convenient for people to diss WAR, then use a WAR argument about Buxton's awesomeness.... Also, the statements of just alternative facts to justify the hatred.
And yet, I read all the time "if Berrios can just hit 230, his defense makes him valuable!". Uh, that's basically a WAR argument..... Putting aside how it is calculated, it's a WAR argument. And, it greatly values his defense.