Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Hosken Bombo Disco

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    17,829
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Hosken Bombo Disco

  1. Look at it this way. The 4-6-3 double play has evolved into something like a ballet. The throw is coming from the direction of first base to second, where the shortstop sweeps past the bag, catching the throw and transferring, and returning the throw to first in one motion, the runner hitting the dirt during the performance. The play is moving fast. Both the fielder and the runner have the same objective: second base. In order to get the throw to first as quickly as possible, the shortstop takes liberties with tagging the second base bag. The runner will usually lose the race to the second base, and is looking for his own advantage. Here is my test..imagine there is no double play situation, no shortstop, no other player on the field except the base runner sliding into second. Does the slide look legit? In the case of Coughlan sliding into Kang, I would say yes, it was a good slide.
  2. I'm not an old byto guy, I don't know what's going on, but I like it
  3. But the intent is not to maim the infielder, so no.
  4. even though the new rule---a written rule, by the way----speaks specifically to the runners ability to touch the bag.
  5. I have a hard time believing that every slide is either clean or dirty, black or white. For people who believe the Coughlan slide into Kang was dirty, can you post some videos of some clean slides or slides which you are not sure about?
  6. "A good two feet" isn't that far and the runner still maintained possession of the bag easily with his hand. There are much more egregious examples of bad slides, such as the Utley one, which is what this rule is in place to eliminate.
  7. The only thing I would disagree with you on is the coaches coaching up Nishioka. That spring I heard that Tom Kelly worked countless hours with Nishioka on relearning how to make that play.
  8. I think the runner is already into his slide and the play happens a little too fast for the runner to make an adjustment if the ball was to be dropped.
  9. I know you take a harder stand against hard slides than most. I think the new rule is trying to remove context. If there's a throw coming in from left field to the short inside of part of the bag on a player trying to leg out a double, you might see that very same slide that took out Kang. I didn't see anything malicious in the slide that took out Kang and the runner would have been able to maintain contact with the bag. JMO
  10. The rule says (dangerous to paraphrase a written rule, but...) but basically I think the rule says if by completing your slide you can still maintain contact with the bag by hand or foot, then it's a good slide.
  11. Not sure I understand your response. The Utley slide into Tejada seems completely different from the slide into Kang, with the Swisher slide into Nishioka somewhere in the middle.
  12. Just curious, but what is everyone's opinion of the slide that took out Kang? http://m.mlb.com/video/v485731983
  13. What killed Nishioka was the take out slide at second.
  14. Well I like Sano's effort as a third baseman.
  15. Radcliffe said it's going to be a long time before Sano gets anywhere near league average. So why would you say that?
  16. Yeah it's SSS but it's not irrelevant. In those 9 games you saw Sano lay out for a ball. Plouffe almost never gives up his body for a ball to his right. http://m.mlb.com/video/topic/29387502/v316475183/sea-min-sano-makes-a-diving-stop-to-rob-gutierrez
  17. Yes, lost in all of this is that Plouffe is a pretty good third baseman.
  18. Let me know if anyone follows up with you on this question!
  19. Do we have data on which pitches in the count Rosario swung at? I have a recollection of him falling behind 1-2, then showing a fairly good batting eye while working the count to 3-2, but then on 3-2 he seemed to panic and was determined to swing no matter what, and of course the pitcher knew this and Rosario struck out. Is there something to that, or did I just make something up based on a few plate appearances I saw? Great article work as usual.
  20. I agree. I wonder if Molitor is as unhappy about this as many posters are here. Again like you said, why else would he come out and say it in such a way at this time? ugh
  21. How would you handle the Kepler angle?
  22. I don't disbelieve you, but they seem like completely different skills. I would love to see links of analysis or opinion on this but wouldn't know where to look (Bill James?)
  23. True, neither you or the team have said that, but plenty of posters on here are saying that.
×
×
  • Create New...