Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Brandon Warne

Verified Member
  • Posts

    1,486
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Brandon Warne

  1. With that said, Ehire Adrianza might be able to do exactly what Iglesias did last season (.255/.306/.336 with great defense)
  2. Iglesias can really, really pick it. I wouldn't have a real issue with that.
  3. Stick with Polanco, at least he can hit. I'm the most outspoken advocate of Santana -- and that's damning with faint praise -- but he should not be in the consideration for regular playing time. No way, no how.
  4. The short answer is no. The longer answer is no, sir.
  5. Probably asked each player what they wanted to share.
  6. Wouldn't rule anything out. I think this will be a year for Buxton where he's like a 3-4 win player with like a .720 OPS because his speed and defense are that good. But next year is when he'll really break out.
  7. For $7 million, I'm pretty sure he has.
  8. It's difficult, but this is obviously true for the August part. In September with roster expansion it didn't matter as much.
  9. Wrote an article today on a theory I've been developing about Joe Mauer: http://coldomaha.com/2017/twins/theory-less-is-more-with-joe-mauer/ As always, love to discuss and hear critiques, etc.
  10. He's not old, but he's not exactly young, either. The two primary things that worked against him this offseason were his age and the side of second base he plays on. At his age at shortstop, he'd be a superstar that almost every team would be in line to acquire. Similarly, if he was say, 26.....he'd have had more value. Then again, if either of those were true, the Twins wouldn't be looking to move him.
  11. He played 112 of the team's first 119 games and hit .284/.384/.417. In that game against Atlanta, he screwed up his quad and the rest of his season was wrecked. He played just 22 of the remaining 43 games (20 starts) and hit just .146/.255/.244 the rest of the way. That's a pretty clear divide if you ask me. There's also this: From the All-Star Break until the Atlanta game, Mauer hit .324/.420/.529 while starting 26 of the team's 31 games. That's 83.9 percent, or about a 135-game per season pace. Before that, he had hit .271/.372/.381 while starting 79 of the team's first 88 games (a 145-game (89.8 percent) pace). My deduction is this: less is more with Mauer. Molitor said that was one of the primary considerations he had during the All-Star Break, and I think it's pretty clear that it was a big deal. So if Joe can get into 120-130 games this year, I think he can be a fairly productive player.
  12. Maybe on a more traditionally structured lineup. The Twins don't have much in the way of OBP guys, so I think you could justify batting him first or second.
  13. 31st in OBP, 30 teams in MLB? I'd say that's pretty good. Machine? Maybe not. But if we must compare Joe to other full-time players, it's pretty decent.
  14. He said in the second half that he was aware Joe plays better with more time off. Keep in mind, Mauer was playing very, very well for the bulk of the season before the quad stuff cropped up. It's hard to strike a balance, though it was pretty obvious Joe wasn't right late in the season until he ultimately just sat out the rest of the way.
  15. AL first basemen: http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=1b&stats=bat&lg=al&qual=0&type=8&season=2016&month=0&season1=2016&ind=0&team=0,ss&rost=0&age=0&filter=&players=0 Joe Mauer: http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=1857&position=C There's a survivor bias in using only qualified players because of how many plate appearances that requires. I prefer to use this information.
  16. .327 wOBA against an AL average mark of .329 102 wRC+ against an AL average mark of 105
  17. He was roughly a league-average first baseman offensively last year. It is what it is.
  18. (which sort of lines up with 20 of his ~250 plate appearances ending with a pitch that fast. roughly same percentage)
  19. For what it's worth, he saw 98 pitches over 95 mph last year. Just over 9 percent of all the pitches he saw.
  20. No, not 20 pitches. 20 plate appearances ended with a pitch over 95 mph. Not exactly the same.
  21. Believe he had the ninth-best OBP among 1B last year. That's not total garbage. I mean....it's whatever. He's a sunk cost who had a serious brain injury. It's not ideal.
  22. I don't follow the logic. He's the best defensive first baseman on the team -- by probably a fairly long shot -- and gets on base more than pretty much anyone else on the team. The "nine-best hitters" bit is an oversimplication, but until he's actually actively hurting the offense, he's going to play. He's very far from doing that.
  23. I did some research and wrote this on the struggles of Byungho Park. As a result, I'm not convinced he can be an impact hitter in the big leagues. http://coldomaha.com/2017/twins/chronicling-the-struggles-of-byungho-park/ As always, read and critique and let's have a good discussion!
  24. No seriously though, what's even the point? To get him off the roster? That's literally the only benefit of designating him for assignment, and that's a murky benefit even on his worst day.
×
×
  • Create New...