No one WANTS stupid policies, but no one seems to care whether they are stupid or not so long as the packaging they are presented in sounds good. From Bush's education policies, to the current gun control proposals, to anything from this last SOTU - people don't seem to care about nuance. They care about rhetoric. I'm not saying anything revolutionary here, but I think the degree to which people are willing to overlook things has gotten worse. For example, I don't think Bill Clinton was corrupt when he signed in many of the housing initiatives 20 years ago. I think it was a genuine, principled act of trying to make the American dream happen for more people. Except the policies were toxic and made things much, much worse for the very people he intended to help. I don't know where in that process things broke down, but they did. We should be more careful to demand good solutions, not ones that sound good. My instinct on the minimum wage laws is that it is likely a zero-sum game for those we intend it to help. More than likely the careers that would see a boost in income are in the same sectors of the economy in which the impoverished spend their money. Meaning any benefit in their spending power may be reduced or eliminated by increases in the costs they most associate with. (For example, fast food sales are dominated by the lower class) If there is real, substantial benefit - then yeah, sign me up. I just want to see that analysis first.