So, you are debating consistency vs competency. The argument you are posing is that Hicks can be competent in spurts, but fails to do so consistently. My counter to that is if Hicks was consistent, he wouldn't be a back up player. Mastro can't be decent for any stretch, and he isn't going to develop into anything more than that. Hicks at least has the ability to be a competent, league average player, even if it is inconsistently, and is young enough that there could be hope that he becomes more consistent. You are never going to have a bench of guys who are both consistent and competent. With that being understood, isn't a bench of guys who are inconsistently competent better than a bench of guys who are consistently incompetent?