$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ I find it a bit amusing that an article mostly relevant to $$$$ is "sponsored" by a law firm. (But thank you, TD, for maximizing revenue sources and keeping the site free of charge.) To address the Iowa situation, I think that the inclusion of the entire state in six home markets is short-sighted by these teams. The idea of inclusion in regional sports networks is to increase the amounts paid by cable companies -- but if those cable companies aren't including them, what good is inclusion doing???? From a team's standpoint, shouldn't it also be about building your market base in those areas so that fans who live there will, on occasion, travel to your city and spend $$$$$. Somewhat distant fans might not buy season tickets but in any given trip, they are likely to go to multiple games plus drop quite a bit of cash on food, lodging and shopping. How do you encourage that if they rarely see you on TV??? It would make logical sense to me that the Twins' home market only extend to about the northern quarter of the state (and even then, perhaps not all the way to the eastern border). In northwest Iowa we've always considered ourselves "Twins Territory" but that may be because we watch Sioux Falls television as much as Sioux City for network & local programming. And in general, our local cable companies carry FSN. JC and I have exchanged posts in the past about the cable situation. For those Iowa residents who are fortunate enough to opt for satellite TV instead, the situation is better. You can go with something like extra innings on Direct TV. But I still stay with Dish Network instead. Without opting for any programming other than what I would purchase anyway, I get the games for all 6 "home" teams plus MLB network and MLB alternate (when not blacked out) plus the ESPN games, etc. etc. I don't get to see everything I would see with an mlbTV subscription but there's enough variety that I don't feel deprived. The situation is a mess, though. I'd like to see demographics (by age) on cable subscribers. I would guess that it is a population that is "aging out" somewhat as younger viewers opt for internet options rather than cable. And in the end, it is the changes in viewing habits that are likely to bring change.