To me, the Nolasco thing is much like Pelfrey, but with a much higher price tag. Like Pelfrey, Nolasco hasn't been right physically in his two years with the Twins. Like Pelfrey, he is perceived as standing in front of younger, cheaper, better options. Like Pelfrey, he hasn't had enough success in a Twins uniform for many fans to believe there is still quality in his right arm. It is probably nothing, but during spring training, Nolasco seemed to be the guy who wouldn't be conforming with what ever drill the pitchers were doing. His on-field demeanor has always non-plussed me as well. However, I've seen just enough of the "good Ricky" that I believe there is value there. While the Twins have obvious weak spots in their position players, starting pitching always has to be a high priority. Nolasco can be part of the solution.