Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

ashbury

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    40,765

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    462

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by ashbury

  1. ashbury
    Normalized to the league, Plouffe's 2014 OPS of .751 was good for 110 OPS+. We do have two other world series winners to compare to: Gaetti's OPS of .788 in 1987 only comes to 102 OPS+, and Pagliarulo's 1991 OPS of .706 comes to a paltry 91 OPS+. (Scotty Leius did supplement Pags at third, in one of the more successful platoons in Twins history, so that their combined production was probably about in line with Plouffe's season.) Ah yes, I overlooked another world series Twins team, one that didn't win it all. 1965 had the legendary Rich Rollins and his .641 (OPS+ 79). Others have debated the substance of your position, but I couldn't let this Twins-specific aspect of it go without comment. It seems clear to me that a team could win with Trevor Plouffe at third base if he keeps up present production, and without the manager having to go to great lengths to work around him. 1991 was more of a challenge and required some actual Managin'TM for the position.
  2. ashbury
    Mauer will have to stand in line for his chance to punch TC Bear.
  3. ashbury
    If I read TD, I would laugh at this very funny post.
  4. ashbury
    Will this be enough, or should he go old-school and also punch some sides of beef? Cross-train, sez I.
  5. ashbury
    At one time, at least, you could find YouTube footage of Darin Mastroianni giving an interview in Spanish. Darin for manager!
  6. ashbury
    Plouffe 2014 against White Sox (1.084 OPS) or Plouffe 2014 against Indians (.471)?
  7. ashbury
    Moderator's Note: this is heading down a path more like bickering than good discussion, with undercurrents of accusations of arguing in bad faith. Please keep it civil.
  8. ashbury
    It's certainly true that higher leagues are harder than lower leagues and a batter who moves up tends to see an immediate drop in his stats. For an older player that might be the end of the story, but someone young can compensate by learning more each year. I think Walker stands a good chance of avoiding that .220-.230 rut if he reaches the majors.
  9. ashbury
    Ditto. A team option on him was a win-win for the team. I don't know if I understand why any player would accept a contract containing one. Likewise I don't understand why a team agrees to a contract containing a player option. Win-win for the player if whether he does terribly or outstandingly. But I digress...
  10. ashbury
    What happened to the "Mom Brought Pizza?!?" video? That had to be ranked somewhere, right?
  11. ashbury
    Maybe lack of public evidence of the fire in the belly for the job, which is what I also perceive to be what holds back Molitor from getting the nod without any need for further interviews. Note that this is not the same as the fiery personality type, for which Mientkiewicz gets positive reviews. I think the ideal candidate hasn't surfaced yet. You want cool under pressure; you want the burning desire to win; you want an analytical mind who also trusts what he sees; you want youthful vigor and the wisdom that comes with age. And so on. And you want no red flags. If after all this it eventually circles back to either Glynn or Molitor I think we will be OK.
  12. ashbury
    I don't hold Mientky's on-field fight against him forever. But I would like to see him build up three more years on his resume with no further embarrassments to himself or his team. That could be as a minor league manager, or as a major league coach. Sitting at Gene Glynn's right hand side, for instance; they might team up well, I don't know. But no, not as Gardy's immediate replacement. And I agree with the comments that his being young doesn't preclude him from being considered old-school, if he views Getting After It as more important than talent for example.
  13. ashbury
    J.J. Gardyhire - first player/manager since Rose!
  14. ashbury
    Having been reminded of his skirmish with another minor league manager, I am less enthused about him receiving an early promotion than before. I'd like to see him put in about 3 more years, without drama that reflects badly on him or his organization, before entrusting him with the keys to the dugout. "Fiery" may be good, "ticking time bomb" is not.
  15. ashbury
    I was in Houston in late July and took in a couple of games, and was amazed/disappointed that the city isn't getting behind a team that, while still losing, seemed fun to watch. Several exciting players, some good starting pitching, already on the major league team. I am virtually certain that the PA system was piping in cheers at appropriate moments, because it didn't seem possible the noise could have been generated by the number of fans I could see - but the roof was closed and maybe they do get enough echoes to get the sound level up by legitimate means, in which case playoff baseball could be rockin'. At any rate, Houston is IMO another cautionary tale for a front office that thinks the visibly-blow-it-up route is a good one for a rebuild.
  16. ashbury
    Conventional wisdom is that a winning season shows up in attendance the next year. That's what we see in their 2014 attendance. When the market goes that dead for that long, it may take longer to ramp up again. Maybe 2015 sees 2.5M? Cautionary tale for our own 4x90 loss team.
  17. ashbury
    Agreed, and that's not my objection. Actually I don't have a specific objection, except that almost nobody gets their first managerial job at age 58. Terry Ryan could probably explain why that is, and maybe finding the exceptional person is some kind of market inefficiency we should be exploiting. But since there are a lot of good candidates out there, I'm not inclined to buck the trend.
  18. ashbury
    Nice anecdote. Great to have on the staff. Not sure that it translates to being a manager. Their views might change the first time he has to tell them "No" and make it stick.
  19. ashbury
    Two outfielders signed for $20M+ through 2017 and 2019 respectively, with declining defensive abilities, belong in LA. For that kind of money you could be going after a couple of borderline-ace pitchers as FA this year or next.
  20. ashbury
    I might be the only TD poster whose hat isn't in the ring.
  21. ashbury
    Nobody over the age of 55, please.
  22. ashbury
    Probably the biggest tragedy in this whole sorry mess.
  23. ashbury
    That's the trick I always used to remember Albert Ienstien's name.
  24. ashbury
    Dodgers didn't want to re-sign Nolasco last year. Why would they want him now?
  25. ashbury
    Now do one for the Sam Deduno pitches that got past the catcher.
×
×
  • Create New...