Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

ashbury

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    42,484

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    471

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by ashbury

  1. ashbury
    I stopped reading the Bill of Rights when it began "Congrefs of the United States...". How did anyone back then take those people seriously? "Yo, Madison my man, are we not doing spellcheck anymore?"
  2. ashbury
    Giving up only 1 or two runs, if it happens, would probably count as a "reason".
  3. ashbury
    Except for the 6-inning no-hitter in his first 2017 outing. And his two most recent starts were 3 hits in 7.1 innings, and 5 hits in 8 innings.
  4. ashbury
    My explanation is that the front office has a self-imposed discipline, and they stuck to it. Had Berrios not thrown a relative clunker on April 19 in suburban Atlanta, he might have been up sooner. Two straight high-quality AAA starts afterward must not have been their metric, but the next one was. Management always preaches "consistency", and two in a row doesn't cut it. That's my reverse-engineering solution to the puzzle. I always prefer to try that, than to conclude "their idots".
  5. ashbury
  6. ashbury
    “We're on a first-number basis with each other. He calls me 3 and I call him 2.” -- Bill Lee, the Spaceman
  7. ashbury
    I just looked up that quote. What he actually said was: "No man is an Iland, intire of itselfe; every man is a peece of the Continent, a part of the maine." That man makes some of us look like spelling bee champions.
  8. ashbury
    That Gonsalves video needs to receive endless airplay. My Adopt-A-Prospect Ben Rortvedt got one of his base hits on a bunt single. There was already a man aboard at first base, so does someone local know whether this looked like a bunt for a base hit, or if he squared up for a routine sacrifice attempt that somehow went better than expected and yet involved no misplay? It was a road game, so probably no one here will know, but I'm curious. I wouldn't expect a gift from the Wisconsin scorer.
  9. ashbury
    Moderator's note: This is not directed solely toward you, but also to several others participating in this thread. The inclination to imply opposing viewpoints must be idiocy, or to express your ideas in the strongest possible terms, has the opposite effect on your readers, who then discount what you say to compensate. Please tone down the heated rhetoric, everyone. (And please don't compound the problem by responding to this post in-thread.)
  10. ashbury
    He's my Adopt-A-Prospect, and to summarize what I wrote up there, I'm no pro scout but when I watched him this past March he was throwing 94, and more importantly the hitters didn't seem to be getting a good read on him. Bottom line, he's got a chance.
  11. ashbury
  12. ashbury
    Not unless I ask them to. "Enjoy your new coffee table, sir." "Yes, thanks, but what happened to our sofa, and china hutch... and the bed?"
  13. ashbury
    That's a useful page, but defaults to players with "qualified" numbers of plate appearances. That might be somewhat appropriate for discussion of every other fielding position, but catchers should be held to a looser standard because of the more-frequent days off built into their careers. You have to drop the number of 2017 plate appearances to 75 to get 31 players, i.e. approximately one for every team. Fourteen of these guys are batting .270 or higher. (Jason Castro appears in the list of 31, but not in the top 14. ) That's not perfect either, because some of those guys are DHing or playing other positions at times. but ranked lists are just a first cut at understanding anyway.
  14. ashbury
    I have been told that over-analysis has been a chronic problem at Twins Daily, but honestly I'm not seeing it.
  15. ashbury
    "I'm a psychic amnesiac. I know in advance what I'll forget." - ibid. "I'm a psychic amnesiac. I know in advance what I'll forget." - ibid.
  16. ashbury
    Not the first, sorry. http://tompettybook.com/images/tom-petty-sidebar.png
  17. ashbury
    There are other gifted proofreaders at this site too, you know.
  18. ashbury
    Unless there is more to this, won't a ranked list of pitchers be in the same order under either metric, except reversed? Isn't every start either quality or meltdown? Ted Williams led the league in outs-not-made with a .594 average in 1941.
  19. ashbury
    So you thought you were thinking, but thought wrong, if I have this straight. This explains a lot, and I'm going to have to go back and re-evaluate a great number of posts. This will take some time. Good night. PS: I can't bear to watch this game anymore anyway.
  20. ashbury
    I'd like to give credit, but we need confirmation from Mrs Chief first. She knows how you think, better than you do yourself.
  21. ashbury
    Not to nitpick, but... well yeah, or to geek out, I guess. But, why would they aim for AA? There aren't any AA leagues within 1000 miles or thereabout. Same dilemma Reno had when they went AAA.
  22. ashbury
    Oy. A well-played shaggy-dog story. Well played, well-player.
  23. ashbury
    An established position player for bullpen help is not how I think of successful franchises being built.
  24. ashbury
    I eat a bowl of Chu-REE-ohs every morning, what's the problem?
  25. ashbury
    Fun With Numbers. I wouldn't even have made an issue of it but your closing sentence seemed too good to pass up.
×
×
  • Create New...