I think they are a rebuilding team because of the following reasons. 1) The rotation. They have two rookies that will likely be their best SPs but the need time to develop at the ML level. They have two veteran pitchers (Nolasco & Hughes) with no value. It is also probable that a 3rd member of the rotation is in AAA right now and Gonsalves might just be the key to completing a playoff contending rotation. It would seem to me the rotation is just getting started in terms of rebuilding. Until such time they are given the opportunity to develop at the ML level and the no value players are shed it's not really a rebuild. I remain doubtful based on what I've seen so far 2) The Outfield – Buxton and Kepler are our best prospects amongst position players. They are also among the best prospects in the game. The league has adjusted to Rosario’s lack of plate discipline. He needs to adjust. He will be quite good if he can adjust and a 4th outfielder if not. Bottom line is that it’s probable two-thirds of our future outfield is playing at AAA. Sano probably (hopefully) moves back to 3rd so it might be appropriate to say our entire outfield is in rebuild mode. This might be the best example of what a disaster this "rebuild" has been, 4 straight years of going into a season with an unproven CF and retroactive backup plans that included, Jason Bartlett, Darin Mastroianni, Jordan Schaefer and Clete ****ing Thomas. Follow that up with the grand scheme to play your future franchise player in RF, despite the fact he plays 3rd base. Speaking of Kepler, when is getting his chance btw? I mean I know we don't want to take playing time away from Robbie Grossman during a rebuild and all but it seems to me there should be an opportunity. 3) The Infield. 1B-Mauer is replacement level. I am not sure how that will be handled but he is not the best option going forward. That is probably Park. 2B-It is obvious the league has adjusted to Dozier. They will pitch away, away, and away. If he refuses to adjust or cant adjust, he will not be much more than replacement level going forward. 3B-Sano should be the 3b of the future and I join everyone else in wanting him at 3B. Experiment aside, this is a product of rebuilding. C-I think we all agree that the catching position needs to be rebuilt. So, basically, the entire infield is in a state of rebuilding. Calling the Sano in RF experiment a product of rebuilding is too much spin for me to handle, that is some take. Dozier pulls away, away, away for going on 5 months and the example of their rebuild is to bench him and send Polanco down in order to play future cornerstone Eduardo Nunez. I'll eat my words if Nunez is eventually traded, which he better be but I'm not holding my breath. Mauer as a replacement level player being an example of a rebuild...................yeah, ok then. 4) The bullpen is in transition right now as several people are being auditioned and there is more to come. Chargois will be here by the AS break and several others are good candidates to be here between now and next season. Several people being auditioned? Who, that have any business sticking with this team? Why isn't Chargois here now? Several other good candidates between now and next season? You mean just like the ones TR basically promised between the end of last season and this season but failed to materialize? Sounds like a team in rebuild mode to me. Sounds like a disaster to me.