So you're asserting that Willingham had no trade value, but with no rational argument to back that up, it seems like the sort of claim you've reverse engineered solely from the premise that if he did have value, the Twins would have traded him, because, as you also asserted, they were rebuilding. But that's small potatoes compared to your claim that the dumping of Morneau, Liriano, etc when they were at or near the point of zero value to the franchise represented any actual commitment to rebuilding. They were not even remotely in the same vein as the trades of Revere and Span. And it's tiny potatoes compared to implying that those minuscule moves are relevant in any way to the potentially franchise-altering trades of Dozier or Santana.