I see your point but the comparison has faults: 1. Berrios is only six months older than Stewart and pitched in AAA last season, whereas Stewart hasn't even hit A+ ball 2. Berrios has flashed real strikeout ability, whereas Stewart has yet to start missing bats 3. Berrios has all those intangibles that people love in a prospect (hard worker, good attitude, very coachable) 4. Stewart wasn't really better than Berrios; one could make an argument that either player was better than the other during their respective Cedar Rapids seasons Law has continually under-graded Berrios because of his size. Yeah, I get it... Size is a huge benefit the further you go up the ladder in baseball but after a time, you have to start questioning whether it's an issue for Berrios, just like it wasn't an issue for Pedro, Santana, or a bunch of other successful MLB players. FYI, I'm still not 100% sold on Berrios and I openly questioned his draft slot because he's such a small guy but after multiple seasons of just killing it at every level, those doubts start to falter. Sometimes you have to question your own personal biases and whether they're clouding your judgment on a particular player. I think that is very much the case with KLaw and Berrios.