I'm against national education. I think it can be handled more efficiently on the state level and if Mississippi wants to be a ****hole and undereducate their populace, have at it, you friggin' morons. I swear that at least half of my state's rights issues revolve around how much I hate the south and how much of a drag they are on the rest of us. If they want to continue living in a pit of despair, that's not my problem. I care about Minnesota, I don't give a flying **** about backwater Alabama and their 200+ years of trying to drag America backwards at every opportunity. Let them live in their neocon utopia of degraded civil rights, underemployment, and massive wealth inequity. I think the fastest route to killing the horrible neocon/tea party movement is to let them have it, at least on a state level. That'll teach 'em real fast. But I agree that managing educational assets through property taxes is asinine. Not only does it create wild fluctuations in school budgets, it also ensures that states will continue to create an underclass of people through piss-poor education in low-income areas (less property value, less school funding). I think educational assets should be moved more toward the state level and away from the municipal level.