Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    The Twins Can Buy Without Sacrificing Tomorrow, by Targeting Emerson Hancock

    A deal with Seattle could strengthen Minnesota's playoff push, while adding a rotation piece under team control through 2030.

    Matthew Taylor
    Image courtesy of Joe Nicholson-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    For the past several weeks, the biggest debate surrounding the Twins has centered around one question: should they buy or should they sell? With the club hovering around the Wild Card race, there are compelling arguments on both sides. Buyers believe the Twins have enough talent to make a postseason run if they reinforce a few weaknesses before the August 3 trade deadline. Sellers point to the club's roughly one-in-three playoff odds and argue that it would be wiser to shift focus toward building the next core of championship-caliber players. The Twins staked out their position Tuesday, though: they're buying. The goal now is to do it responsibly.

    Most trade deadline decisions force teams to pick a lane. Emerson Hancock is one of the few players who could allow the Twins to both shore up this year's rotation and carry that help forward for multiple seasons.

    The Seattle Mariners find themselves in an interesting position. They sit at 53-55, third place in the AL West, with three teams (including the Twins) standing between them and the final Wild Card spot. Despite those standings, FanGraphs still gives Seattle a 59.1% chance to reach the postseason, making them one of the more fascinating teams to watch over the next several days. Even with those favorable playoff odds, nearly every report surrounding the Mariners suggests they are expected to move at least one of their starting pitchers. During his trade deadline preview on YouTube, Jeff Passan said he expects Seattle to trade Emerson Hancock before the deadline.

    Trading Hancock would not necessarily signal a sell-off. Quite the opposite. The Mariners simply possess more starting pitching than almost anyone else in baseball. Their current rotation is six arms deep, and help is already on the way. Two of baseball's premier pitching prospects, Kade Anderson and Ryan Sloan, are nearing the majors, giving Seattle the luxury of dealing from an area of tremendous organizational strength.

    What the Mariners desperately need is offense. Seattle owns one of baseball's weakest lineups, entering the deadline with a .690 team OPS. Their struggles become even more pronounced against left-handed pitching, where their .656 OPS ranks third-worst in baseball. If the Mariners intend to chase a playoff spot, their priority will almost certainly be acquiring impact bats.

    From the Twins' perspective, Hancock checks nearly every box. The former top-50 prospect debuted in 2023, and while his first taste of the majors came with growing pains, 2026 has looked much more like the version scouts envisioned when Seattle selected him sixth overall in the 2020 draft. This season, Hancock owns a 3.16 ERA while posting career bests nearly across the board. His strikeout rate has climbed to 23%, and his 3.73 strikeout-to-walk ratio reflects the improved command that made him such a highly regarded prospect. 

    His arsenal has taken another step forward, as well. Hancock's fastball has become one of the more effective pitches in his repertoire, while his sweeper has generated a 37% whiff rate. Just as importantly, he has handled both right-handed and left-handed hitters effectively, avoiding the dramatic platoon splits that often limit young starters.

    Perhaps the most attractive part of his profile has nothing to do with this season. Hancock remains in his pre-arbitration years and is under team control through the 2030 season. That's exactly the type of pitcher the Twins should be targeting. Rather than acquiring a rental starter who only helps for two months, Minnesota could add a pitcher capable of sliding immediately into the middle of the rotation while also becoming a foundational piece for several seasons. Whether the Twins ultimately sneak into the playoffs or not, Hancock would remain one of the organization's most valuable long-term assets.

    That makes him one of the rare deadline acquisitions who strengthens both the present and the future. Of course, acquiring that kind of pitcher will not come cheaply.

    Making things even more interesting is the schedule. Minnesota travels to Seattle this weekend for a three-game series, the final series before both clubs reach the August 3 trade deadline. Those games could dramatically alter the outlook for both organizations. If the Twins win the series and bury the Mariners a little deeper in the Wild Card standings, Seattle could become much more motivated to prioritize future value over a playoff chase. On the other hand, if the Mariners surge over the next week, they could still view themselves as buyers while remaining motivated to move Hancock in exchange for immediate offensive help.

    In that scenario, the Mariners would likely seek hitters who can help them immediately, especially a right-handed bat. Minnesota is one of the few organizations capable of satisfying that need. A package centered around Royce Lewis and a couple of the team's higher-level prospects could make sense, if Seattle believes Lewis can regain his All-Star form while giving them another impact right-handed bat. Another possibility would be a deal built around Luke Keaschall, whose offensive upside and ability to play the outfield would fit well with what the Mariners are trying to accomplish.

    Those kinds of moves become much more palatable for Minnesota because of the talent waiting in the upper levels of the farm system. Kaelen Culpepper continues to move toward the majors, Walker Jenkins remains one of baseball's top prospects, and the Twins have enough young position-player depth to replace a player like Lewis or Keaschall internally while strengthening a rotation that still needs another dependable arm. 

    That flexibility is exactly what makes Hancock such an appealing target. Most deadline additions force teams into an all-in approach or push them toward selling off pieces for tomorrow. Hancock represents something different. He would improve Minnesota's chances of competing this season while giving the organization another controllable starter to build around for 2027, 2028 and beyond. If the Twins are looking for a way to invest in the present without sacrificing the future, there may not be a better trade target available at this year's deadline.


    What do you think? Should the Twins pursue Emerson Hancock if the Mariners make him available? Leave a comment below and start the conversation!

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Carson Tinney

    Fort Myers Mighty Mussels - A, C
    On Tuesday, Tinney went 2-for-5 with two home runs for Fort Myers. He hit a 2-run homer in the 3rd inning, and then he hit a 2-run walkoff homer in the bottom of the ninth!

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    Right premise but wrong solution. If the Twins actually want to be buyers then Hancock is the perfect trade candidate. However I’m not trading Lewis or Keaschall to make it happen. You could probably make it happen by some package of Jeffers, Rodriguez, and another top 20 prospect. 

    1 hour ago, Rufus said:

    The Yankees, Rays, White Sox and others are desperate for catching..  If the Twins want to trade him target those teams. Why would the Mariners want Jeffers?  they have Cal Raleigh,  I know he is having a down year,  But they are a bad trade target if the Twins want to deal Jeffers.  

    Just for the right handed bat and Raleigh has been having a down year.  Sitting him might not hurt.   They very well might not want Jeffers there just aren't many if any .900 OPS bats available beyond Jeffers though and it seems every team needs right handed bats.  They could play him at first and DH when he is better than the alternative.

    13 hours ago, LA Vikes Fan said:

    I’ve been pushing a trade for Hancock on other threads here, but I don’t think giving up Lewis or Keaschall should be necessary or is a good idea. They need a right handed hitting catcher in the worst way with Raleigh still suffering from the strained oblique and hitting .167. How about trading them Jeffers and a high-end hitter from our system like Emma, Gonzales or Mendez? Maybe they throwing a reliever like Ferrer or Speier and we throw in a middle ranked prospect to even have the deal. I think something like that would make sense for both sides. They get that right handed bat they need plus some real future upside that could help them as early as next year, we get a controllable number three or number four starter and some help in the bullpen.

    Respectfully disagree. Jeffers is our best healthy position player (and a RH bat, which we also need more of); and I see people throwing Emma intro trades like an afterthought a lot recently. He is in a different world as a prospect than Gonzales and Mendez. Granted he can’t stay healthy but trading him (with Jeffers!) for a back end rotation piece throws in the towel this year and has a chance to haunt the Twins for the next 10.

    19 hours ago, tony&rodney said:

    Hard to know where the team leans on trading players from their starting batting order (Jeffers, Lewis, Keaschall in this article) right now. It seems like the Twins are going to keep Jeffers unless a club pays more than is expected, which can happen. 

    Many people have talked about the mediocrity of the American League on the one hand and then do not want the Twins to take a shot now because they are not a very good team. I'm of the belief that all of the teams in baseball are good. There are a few teams that are better and a few are not as good. I have enjoyed watching the Rockies a few times lately. They have some fun players. So much discussion about needed parity but it seems like MLB is very competitive at this moment in time.

    Thus, I am a fan of the Twins making a few moves to strengthen what has been a fun, albeit flawed, team. Focusing on the positive, there really aren't any teams in the AL that are much better than the Twins. A few strategic additions and perhaps a little more attention to small ball at appropriate moments sounds fine with me.

    Emerson Hancock sounds ok but the return to Seattle would be my concern.

    I see in 2025 he had a 4.90 and this year a 3.26 and that's the only really good season he's had. I don't see that as giving up a major prospect for. however, there are so many outfielters that can probably play Major League baseball soon. if not now he can't put them all out there at one time. so for me I would take a chance on this guy with one of those fine people but not any one of our top six outfield prospects. pitching like he is now for the rest of this season could be a godsend to the starting pitching staff to make the playoffs. then you have him for four more years.

    4 hours ago, TL said:

    Respectfully disagree. Jeffers is our best healthy position player (and a RH bat, which we also need more of); and I see people throwing Emma intro trades like an afterthought a lot recently. He is in a different world as a prospect than Gonzales and Mendez. Granted he can’t stay healthy but trading him (with Jeffers!) for a back end rotation piece throws in the towel this year and has a chance to haunt the Twins for the next 10.

    I think this is a fair take, which is what makes this deadline so interesting particularly now that Buxton is out probably for at least two or three weeks. We need Jeffers' bat much worse now and frankly Shelton has got a figure out a way to get him in the lineup every day even if that means more time as the DH and/more time with Caratini playing 1B. Keeping Jeffers definitely makes it more likely that this team makes the playoffs this year, although winning more than one series (if that) seems pretty unlikely to me. Still, I see the advantages of keeping him around and making the Q0 and taking the draft choice compensation if he declines and can't be re-signed, especially given the dreck we would receive in return if the reported rumors are accurate. 

    I do think though we disagree on two fundamental points. I see Hancock is more than just a back end rotation piece. I think he has a real chance to be a mid rotation or better starter for the next four years. That has a lot of value to this team, especially with at least one of Lopez and Ryan likely gone after 2027 and perhaps both. Our other point of disagreement is that I am done worrying about keeping Emma around because of his vast potential. The guy can't stay healthy enough to play more than 75 games in a season and his performance has been good but not outstanding at the AAA level. He will at most have one option year left after this season, and that's only if MLB towards him that fourth year due to injury which I admit seems pretty likely. He's got the classic "three true outcomes" approach at the plate which makes me really wonder if he will be as successful as we all hope you will at the MLB level. I am fine with trading him now while his value is pretty close to its peak as a guy with great potential whose flaws have not yet been exposed at the MLB level. I would only trade him for controllable, established pitching with upside but I would trade him if that was part of the return. I would be really pissed if we trade him for a rental.

     

    Your points on Emma are fair. And I’d trade him for 4 years of a mid rotation or better starter. 

    The trouble is that, as others have pointed out, this looks like an outlier year for Hancock. It’s smart for the Mariners to cash in on him now and I fear it would be at our expense. If he’s a front line guy then they should want to keep him. I’ll gladly trade Emma and more for Kane or Sloan and they can keep Hancock  

     




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...