Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Ryan Kreidler's Arrival Should Lead to James Outman's Exit

    When Royce Lewis is ready to return, it should spell the end of James Outman's time with the big-league club, at least for now. Ryan Kreidler offers everything Outman does, and then some.

    Nick Nelson
    Image courtesy of Jesse Johnson-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    Amid a largely encouraging start for the Minnesota Twins, there's been no shortage of grousing and grumbling about James Outman, whose start has been anything but encouraging. Here in mid-April, the backup outfielder is still searching for his first hit of the season — through 20 plate appearances he's gone 0-for-18 with 10 strikeout and two walks. 

    It's no isolated slump. Outman also struggled mightily down the stretch last year after being acquired in exchange for reliever Brock Stewart at the deadline. In total, he's batting .124 with a .485 OPS and 44% strikeout rate as a Twin. Turning 29 next month, he's not exactly a youthful upside play at this point. The promise Outman showed as a rookie back in 2023 has vanished from sight.

    It's understandable why fans are eager to see Outman ousted. The case for sticking with him rests on two factors:

    1. His role is extremely limited. Outman has started only four of Minnesota's first 17 games, and his 20 PAs rank 13th on the team. Nobody who's been on the roster since the start of the season has played less. You don't want to call up a legitimate player or prospect like Emmanuel Rodriguez, Walker Jenkins or even Alan Roden to languish on the bench and get a handful of ABs each week.
    2. His skills for that limited role are suitable. While he hasn't hit at all, Outman can play all three outfielder positions well and the Twins trust him in center. He also runs well and is 2-for-2 on stolen bases. That's really the primary function of his pure bench role, and he excels with these specific skills more than most alternatives.

    There's also the matter of Outman being out of options, meaning he'd have to be DFA'ed and put through waivers if removed from the active roster. It's likely the main reason he made the team out of camp, but it's becoming less and less of a consideration. Would Outman even be claimed by another team at this point? If he does, would it really be a big deal? 

    The reality is that Kreidler offers everything that Outman does and then some. Need a glove-first (glove-only?) player you can count on all over the outfield, including center? Someone who can run reasonably well if needed as an in-game sub? A guy who you don't mind using sparingly as a bench piece? 

    Check, check, check.

    Kreidler is a very good defender all over the field. He might not be quite as good as Outman in center, but he's close; keep in mind that Kreidler started there on Opening Day for the Tigers last year. Additionally he can back up every infield position, and he'll be an upgrade over the starter at each. Right now, the Twins lack any purpose-fit defensive replacements for their lackluster infield unit.

    The big knock on Kreidler is that he's been one of the worst hitters in baseball. His initial stint with the Twins, which has included two homers and four RBIs in his first three games, has been intriguing on this front, but it's too early to invest much belief in his offense on this basis.

     

    Dating back to 2024, Kreidler's .191 wOBA is sixth-worst among 593 MLB players with 100+ PA. Outman is only slightly better, with his .229 wOBA 22nd-worst. You're looking at two offensive non-factors, and one is bringing far more to the table as a versatile utilityman versus a player whose sole value is being able to handle center field.

    Royce Lewis is eligible to return from the injured list as soon as Monday, and is scheduled to scheduled to start a rehab stint on Saturday. He's in line to return at some point next week. Whenever Lewis is activated, the corresponding move should not be to send down Kreidler, who was brought up as his replacement, but rather Outman, whose ostensible value has been replaced by the Kreidler.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    49 minutes ago, USAFChief said:

    This is not 5 players for 4 positions.

    Bell is not competing for LF or RF playing time. His 5 games a week must come at 1b or DH. And realistically, his bat must be in the lineup every day. Scratch him from your scenario, other than any DH time reduces opportunity for the other 4..

    Conversely, none of the other 4 factor in 1B playing time. Wallner, ERod, Larnach, and Martin are competing for RF/LF and DH...if DH is never covered by Bell, Buxton, Jeffers, or Caratini. Lets say 6 games, 12 OF spots avaliable per week and 4 DH spots--total of 16. That leaves 4 starts per week, if you let all of them switch between RF and LF willy nilly and minimize others at DH. Realistically, though, they're not going to put Martin in right. Probably not putting Wallner in left, and I have no idea what flexibility there is with ERod...all of which further complicates getting even 4 starts per week.

    All 4 are taking up 26 man spots,  leaving 8 to cover CF, 3rd, SS, 2nd, and 2 catchers. You have in effect 2 bench spots left.

     

    For complete clarity. Even if I layed things out equally in the post. It doesn't have to be exactly equal. My post was just a starting point for a dial not a switch. Dial up or dial down based on performance. 

    I just question which players should be dialed all the way up to everyday designation. I question the either or mentality with nothing in between.    

    Ok... If you want Bell to play everyday. Play him everyday at 1B. Now we are talking about 4 players Larnach, Wallner, Erod and Martin for 3 positions LF, RF and DH. Playing 3 out of 4 isn't going to hinder the development of anyone. It isn't going to rust a veteran either. Now consider that 3 out of 4 a dial and not a switch. 

    Personally... I love the start that Bell has had for us... I also love the start that Larnach has had for us. I'd like them both in the lineup as long as they are getting themselves on base like they have been. I'm loving what I'm seeing out of Martin as well. However... we still have 140 games to go and you and I have watched players look different in June compared to how they look in April. We still don't know who is next to hit the injured list... we just know that players are going to hit the injured list.     

    Bell every day? Bell currently has a .799 OPS in 2026 and that is wonderful but he is also a guy that has produced merely decent OPS numbers of .744 .725 and .741 the 3 seasons prior at the DH and 1B positions. We can't treat Bell like he is irreplaceable like like he is Freeman, Vlad Jr or Olson. We shouldn't treat Larnach or Wallner like they are irreplaceable either. Like the Twins can't do better than merely decent.

    It's a dial not a switch. If this team can't find playing time for young players because merely decent can't be taken out of the lineup.

    We will be complaining evermore. 

         

     

    On 4/19/2026 at 10:03 PM, JADBP said:

    Arguing over Outman vs Kreidler vs. Lee vs. Larnach/Wallner/whoever is just a waste of energy.  The argument is when do you bring up the next outfield in AAA?

    We all know it is enormously challenging to jump from AAA to MLB and we expect Emma/Jenkins/Gonzo/C-pepper to stumble when they show up.  But I would MUCH RATHER pay to watch our them than watch any of Outman/Kreidler/Lee and most especially Wallner.  

    At some point Zoll has to grow up and know that he is now running the show, not Falvey.  He needs to put his big boy pants on and make his own decisions, not repeat the same crap that Falvey did.  He needs to learn that some players just are not gonna succeed in MLB, no matter where they were drafted.  He has to let them go (Outman, Wallner, etc) or send them down for retraining (Lee, maybe Lewis?).  He has to be able to let go.  Every once in a while he will lose a Brent Rooker or Spencer Steer, but that should not stop him from moving on from some players.  If Rooker has a good career elsewhere, so be it.  You tried.  I'm OK giving Lewis and Lee types more time (and maybe some specialized AAA time), but it the Wallner, Outman, Kreidler, group needs to be gone.  They are doing more harm than good to the current and the future team.

    You guys may disagree, but this was the problem with Falvey/Rocco.  Why does this team keep repeating failed attempts with players (Manual Margot going 0 for 30)?  How many times do you need to hit yourself on the head with a hammer to prove that it really does hurt?  This team holds on to one-dimensional (one-skilled) players like Outman and Wallner, letting them flail away day after day.  Its inane.  I was hopeful that the "this team will be competitive" mantra and new management might have changed this repetitive failing.  Outman and Wallner do not make the team more competitive--they make it LESS competitive.  

    I would be tempted to send out Lee and give him a reset with Gray and Kreidler at SS. Lee plays some 2B and 3B. It might not last long. Gray probably gets exposed playing regularly but then maybe they go to Culpepper.

    If not Lee I would send out Kreidler. I think Kreidler can play a decent SS and CF. He can run OK. I think Outman is better in the OF and on the bases.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...