Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Report From The Fort: Batting Order Time!


    John  Bonnes

    I’ve got good news for the batting order obsessed: it’s finally your time. With more regulars playing more games this week, it’s time to start paying attention to the Twins lineup. Molitor is clearly trying to find the right mix, and Friday he hinted that the batting order could look quite a bit different against right-handed and left-handed pitching.

    The only thing he has committed to so far is that Byron Buxton will not hit leadoff. Sabremetric types likely concur, given Buxton’s .274 OBP in the majors so far. But I get the sense that Moltor’s decision is more about catering to Buxton’s mindset. Buxton has been at his best when he is aggressive, and the traditional leadoff role expects patience.

    Image courtesy of © Scott Rovak-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    In a recent MNSPN podcast, Roy Smalley talked a little about a time in his career when he batted cleanup. He was a team player, so he was happy to do what the team wanted, but he was never comfortable there, and he admitted it was partly because he was kind of embarrassed to be batting there. He knew what a cleanup hitter was, and he was no cleanup hitter.

    It feels like we saw something similar last year when on-base machine Joe Mauer batted leadoff and promptly went right into the tank. It’s easy to say “Don’t change your approach” but these guys have a lifetime of expectations baked into their brains. Finding someone’s comfort zone is worth something.

    (By the way, I just looked up Smalley’s career OPS as a cleanup hitter. It was .824, 84 points higher than his career OPS. So, as usual, I have no point.)

    Where would Buxton hit instead? Well, today Buxton hit third in the lineup - and that’s the third time in the last four games that he has batted there. Molitor is clearly playing with the idea. Stay tuned.

    One of the other places that Buxton has batted a couple of times lately is second, but today it was Jorge Polanco in that spot versus southpaw Chris Sale. Polanco is a switch-hitter, and he seems to be a true switch hitter, without a really dominant side.

    I wondered if he might be a fit batting second from one side or the other. It turns out, for the last two years, he has hit for a higher average and higher OPS right-handed. However, he seems to have a better eye at the plate right-handed. For instance, last year hitting right-handed he had 27 strikeouts and 14 walks (about a 2:1 ratio). Left-handed, it was much worse: 19/3. But his batting average, on-base percentage, slugging percentage and OPS were all higher hitting left-handed. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ True to form, he got a hit versus the left-hander Sale, and a walk against the right-handed Joe Kelly.

    But don’t get too accustomed to seeing Polanco there or at least not against southpaws. After the game, Molitor suggested this lineup was a little different than might be the case versus left-handed pitching in the regular season. In particular, he mentioned Robbie Grossman, who with his career .347 OBP, would be a pretty good fit in that second spot. With both Kepler and Rosario hitting left-handed, one could imagine a split platoon, where Grossman replaces one or the other.

    And versus right-handers? We saw Kepler there the other night. Before that, over the last two weeks, the other regulars that have played there are Polanco (two weeks ago vs a right-hander), Buxton and Brian Dozier. Dozier would be a great fit there if Buxton bats third, but….

    The smart money is riding on Brian Dozier to hit leadoff. He clearly feels most comfortable there, to the point where we hear about him lobbying for the spot. Indeed, he hit really well there last year, with a .917 OPS. He may just feel comfortable there. For those of you howling, I agree; putting their 40+ home run guy at leadoff makes no logical sense. On the other hand, there are worse hells than having one of your best hitters get most of your team’s at-bats.

    Of course, the other player who would be great hitting second is Joe Mauer. He hasn’t played as often with Dozier and Buxton, so it’s not totally clear where Molitor sees him fitting. The last four times he has played with them, he led off twice and hit third and fifth (versus a left-hander) today.

    Miguel Sano has pretty regularly hit out of the cleanup spot this spring, but in two game he played last week, Molitor tried batting him fifth. And with ByungHo Park likely making the roster, the Twins need to figure out how they want to space their dual slugging right-handed hitters.

    Versus right-handers, one could break them up with Rosario or Kepler, both of whom have been anemic against left-handed pitching but effective against right-handed pitching. Unfortunately, neither has done a lot in camp this spring. Or, I suppose one could look at left-handed hitting catcher Jason Castro, who has veteranness (veterenacity? veterantment?) on his side. Plus his career OPS against right-handers virtually matches that of Rosario.

    Monday we’ll likely see a number of backups in the lineup, but Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday expect the team to be ramping up for the regular season. We’ll see if Molitor settles on the right mix. You’re welcome to take your shot below.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

     

    Dozier was better with the bases empty in 2016, but a subset of a single season is such a small sample it is pretty meaningless...

     

    Oops. That sample wasn't a subset, it was for the entire 2016 season.

     

    The same stat across Dozier's entire career is even more telling:

     

    42.6% of his ABs came when batting in the 1st position

    53.2% of his RBIs came when batting in the 1st position

     

    So for the tiny subset of Dozier's entire career, he has been more productive hitting lead off than anywhere else in the lineup.

    The same stat across Dozier's entire career is even more telling:

     

    42.6% of his ABs came when batting in the 1st position

    53.2% of his RBIs came when batting in the 1st position

     

    So for the tiny subset of Dozier's entire career, he has been more productive hitting lead off than anywhere else in the lineup.

    So Dozier's rookie season struggles, when he never batted leadoff, is going to be used as evidence that he's just not as productive outside the leadoff spot?

     

    Also, RBIs is a poor measure of anything meaningful. It is a counting stat. You would want to look at opportunities and how many he converted -- after all, you wouldn't want to judge Dozier as a less productive hitter down in the order if it was a function of batting behind worse hitters.

    I wrote down these potential 2017 lineups on a notepad at the end of the 2016 season, and dug them up this week. They are lineups that I liked, not necessarily what I thought the Twins would use (particularly because they are pretty platoon-oriented). Note that I've updated them by plugging in Castro for Centeno's spot, and I left one outfielder unnamed because, well, see notes below Re: Santana/Grossman.

     

    vs RHP

    Mauer 1B

    Kepler RF

    Dozier 2B

    Sano DH

    Escobar SS

    Buxton CF

    Rosario LF

    Polanco 3B

    Centeno Castro C

     

    Bench

    (Random right-handed hitting outfielder)

    Murphy

    Park

     

     

    vs LHP

    Polanco DH

    Buxton CF

    Dozier 2B

    Sano 3B

    Park 1B

    Escobar SS

    Rosario LF

    (Random right-handed hitting outfielder) RF

    Murphy C

     

    Bench

    Kepler

    Mauer

    Centeno Castro

     

    A couple of notes...

     

    1) Yes, I do like Escobar that much.

     

    2) Apparently I wasn't too far out of line to assume a 13-man pitching staff. But really I just couldn't think of a guy that would be helpful enough both in the field and at the plate. Examples:

    a. Vargas? How many DH/1B can you carry?

    b. Grossman? Couldn't handle the thought of him playing the field in 2017.

    c. Santana? Couldn't handle the thought of him playing the field OR hitting in 2017.

     

    3) Is it just me or does anybody else think a guy like Aaron Hicks would be a pretty good fit for this team? Rests either Rosario or Kepler against left-handed pitching and can rest Buxton in CF as well.

     

    4) Is it good, bad, or just weird that almost all the guys that I wrote down at the end of 2016 are still "the guys" for 2017?




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...