Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Luke Keaschall's Better Bat Speed Has Begotten Worse Results. Here's Why.

    After a two-day reset during the weekend series in Boston, Luke Keaschall is on notice. If he doesn't perform, he could end up in Triple-A soon, too. His story doesn't have to end like Royce Lewis's and Matt Wallner's, though.

    Image courtesy of © Jordan Johnson-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    The plate appearance totals don't match up perfectly, but it's as close as you could ask it to be. Heading into Memorial Day, Luke Keaschall has played exactly 49 regular-season games in 2026, which is the same number he played in 2025. This time, he knows the daily grind of the majors better. This time, he hasn't had his progress interrupted by injuries. One would hope that he would be proving himself a robust part of the Twins' future, even if he couldn't quite replicate last year's tremendous rookie showing.

    Instead, the comparison of his freshman and (incomplete) sophomore efforts looks like this:

    • 2025: 207 PA, .302/.382/.445, 4 HR, 19 BB, 29 SO
    • 2026: 201 PA, .233/.318/.307, 1 HR, 19 BB, 32 SO

    He remains very good at putting the ball in play, but all the sting has been sapped from Keaschall's stick. He didn't exactly obliterate the ball last year, but his average exit velocity and his hard-hit rate are notably down this year. He overachieved in terms of hitting for both power and average last season, but even at a fundamental quality-of-contact level, he's seen a real degradation this year. Over the weekend, he was benched on consecutive days, as manager Derek Shelton elected to give him the same treatment he gave Matt Wallner and Royce Lewis during their own profound offensive struggles—right before each was shuttled off to the minors.

    Keaschall is younger, has hit better and is more clearly a part of the team's vision for the future than either Lewis or Wallner, so he's not likely to be optioned any time soon. As Shelton commits to making playing time a question of merit and production, though, Keaschall is already losing out. Brooks Lee, Ryan Kreidler, Orlando Arcia and Tristan Gray may not be Murderer's Row, but they all have substantially better offensive numbers than Keaschall has this year—and Keaschall is, by a wide margin, the worst defensive infielder in the group.

    All this is fairly shocking, because Keaschall actually came to camp this year having improved in what looked like the one area that would limit him as a hitter: bat speed. Last season, his average swing speed was just 66.9 miles per hour, according to Statcast—one of the lowest marks in the league. It's not possible to be any kind of power hitter with so little bat speed, so it looked as though Keaschall would need to use his speed and good placement of the ball even to consistently generate doubles in the majors. That he ran into four homers in a third of a season's playing time felt semi-miraculous.

    In theory, he's made a major upgrade this spring. His average swing speed is now 69.2 MPH. That's still well below average, but batters who find the barrel often can produce power at that level. Spencer Horwitz, Michael Busch, Will Smith, Cody Bellinger, Trent Grisham and other guys who have proved themselves capable of 20-plus homers a year live in that range. Admittedly, none of those are great comps for Keaschall, in terms of body type, handedness or bat path, but the point stands. You can have a pretty high ceiling as a hitter, once you get to 69 MPH or so.

    image.png

    In practice, this has been nothing but bad for Keaschall—at least so far. Bat speed isn't primarily about the force you impart on the baseball because of that speed; you can generate just as hard a batted ball by squaring it up well. Bat speed matters, instead, because it lets you decide later and pull the trigger on the swing later—but so far, Keaschall has had no luck in redeeming that advantage for real value.

    With no noticeable or measurable change in his swing path and a significant increase in his bat speed, our default expectation should be that Keaschall would make contact farther in front of his body this year than he did in 2025. Instead, his contact point is almost identical to where it was last year. That tells us that he's making proper theoretical use of the advantage he's gained by swinging faster; he's deciding later. In practice, though, that's creating more problems than it's solving.

    Here's Keaschall handling a fastball down the middle the way a hitter like him should, last August.

    This is Keaschall as we all came to know him as a rookie: direct to the ball, frighteningly accurate with the barrel, and (perhaps most importantly) consistently on time. Now, here he is against another fat heater, last month.

    The temptation, when you see a batter foul a fastball off to the opposite field, is to say they were late on it. Watch closely, though. Keaschall wasn't late here. Rather, he was a hair early, in the timing and the shape of his newly accelerated swing. Set the moments at which he made contact on each pitch side-by-side, and you can see what I mean.

    image.png

    Keaschall's arms are actually more extended in the still on the right. He misses the barrel and clips the ball with the high/outside part of his bat because he's already rotated a hair too far. This is normal, if a bit unfortunate, for a hitter who's newly added some bat speed. It's great to swing faster, but you have to learn to stay on time, too.

    That's a quick glimpse at the fight not to be too early, once you get faster. Now, here's how you can end up a little too late. Here are two cutters away from Keaschall, in early counts. One from last September:

    And one from April:

    Keaschall hit both balls pretty squarely, but as any modern hitting coach will tell you, the difference between a squarely-hit ball pulled in the air and one up the middle on the ground is the difference between payday and pain. Keaschall got around the first of these offerings; he couldn't do so on the second. He's swinging faster this year, but you can't just swing fast; you have to swing on time. Here's the moment at which Keaschall first begins the descent phase of his leg kick—when his swing really begins, as opposed to his load—on each pitch.

    image.png

    Last year, he was starting that part of his move before the pitch left the pitcher's hand. This year, it's more often coming just after release. The difference seems tiny, until you remember that the projectile he's trying to hit (at just the right angle, mind you) is coming in on the north side of 90 miles per hour and that the space in which he can produce the better kind of batted ball runs perhaps six inches from front to back.

    Again, in the long run, this should still be a good thing. Being able to decide later should yield better swing decisions, and if Keaschall decides he still needs to cheat a bit more to produce the contact he wants, he can now sacrifice some contact for power that was unreachable when his swing was one of the five or six slowest in the game. There are no guarantees about getting this evolution right, of course. Plenty of players have gotten permanently broken by trying to shore up some weakness, insufficiently cognizant of the costs of that improvement or simply unable to pay them without going talent-broke. On balance, though, it's fair to stay optimistic about Keaschall as a hitter. This adjustment period has been painful, but it's part of the process of going from good to (knock on wood) great.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Khadim Diaw

    Wichita Wind Surge - AA, C/OF
    The Twins 3rd round pick in 2024 out of Loyola Marymount is moving up to Double-A Wichita. In 58 Kernels games this year, he hit .300/.405/.454 (.859) with 15 doubles and 5 home runs.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    10 hours ago, Wedman13 said:

    No offense taken!  I just don't love the extremes either, which is my only point.  Clearly he/she doesn't see those 3 Hall of famers as a good comp to any second baseman, so it seemed rather odd.  
     

    I hate to pile on Royce and MW but per the article I just think a 23yr old 2b in a 7-8 week slump is vastly different than upper 20's guys (who play positions that demand production) that struggled for a year plus.  - that was what was in the article, not the comments.

    or maybe I'm just hoping beyond hope they keep the season semi-enjoyable, so am overly defensive :)

    It's all good. 

    Regardless of my disagreement with their off-season direction. My summer enjoyment is heavily influenced by how my Twins do.  So... a toast. Here's to a semi-enjoyable Summer! Go ARCIA!!! 😉

    I can't speak for Ash but... his thoughts are worthy of consideration. I think it's a good idea that he is directing his research to runs because a run produced is the ultimate goal of every stat that just busies up the statistical landscape. Ash is sitting down with a pen and paper and tracking run production. Most on Twinsdaily are not looking where Ash looks and I appreciate that. He is looking at the numbers and wondering out loud why the table setters are not scoring more runs. I don't know... it's a good question... why are the power hitters producing more runs. ISO just might be the place to look. 

    To his point... I may not a big fan of Isolated power in itself because I think the simple out or no out is really the most important stat on the planet. I just don't like ISO taking out all those singles especially when singles are so prevalent... about two singles to every 1 extra base hit as a league average.

    With that said... ISO is probably a good thing to check in regards to runs. He may be on to something.

    One fact has always stuck with me and this fact has influenced my thinking in regards to almost everything. The fact that the average OBP is .320. Basically it means that 1 out of 3 hitters reach base and the real good ones are still getting out 3 out of 5 times. We often look at the numbers... this one is high... this one is low but 1 out of 3 reaching base on average basically means that the game is naturally inclined toward zero runs scored in any given inning.

    It will take 3 singles to score a run. You have to get those three singles before you get three outs. The outs are constantly reducing your odds as each out occurs. The odds of 3 positive events is longer than 2 positive events in the race against the outs. One extra base hit and now you are down to two events before the 3 out clock runs out. That is an incredible odds changer. 

    Maybe what Ash is leading us toward. Just a theory... Maybe...Players with high ISO score more runs because an extra base hit puts you in scoring position where one more event can bring you across the plate. Where as a single may still require two more events to score and those three outs are just a buzzer waiting to go off. Because again... 1 out of 3 reach base on average. This means... on average... you ain't scoring a run without an extra base hit. 

    No doubt in my mind. Slugging is much much bigger than OBP. 

    1 hour ago, ashbury said:

    I was writing in response to someone railing against home runs and extolling table setters - "All this emphasis on hitting home runs is ridiculous."

    Doesn't anyone here like Runs Scored?  Because when you look at the guys who score 100 in a season, you don't find many table setters in the list.  You find guys with home runs.  I listed some guys at the very tip top in scoring runs, because they happen to also hit a gob of homers.  Or, maybe they don't just "happen" to.

    If people here took a little more time to try to digest and understand what someone else took the time to write, instead of quickly dashing off something snarky about a power hitter stuck on bad teams never winning a pennant, the conversations here might be more productive.

    Snarkyness was not intended and if taken that way, apologies.  I think a few folks were taken aback by the article and insinuation LK was benched and possibly on a Lewis/Wallner path - when we were at least told it was due to injury.  
     

    He may well flame out, but it seems too early.  And I don't think a Clemens, Arcia, Keidler and Gray infield inspires belief in the future - even if we win some this year.  If Luke is a 3rd Baseman, OF'r, 1st baseman I'd be more concerned.  But I'd sooner take lumps with him, then a retread or Tanner Schoebel.  If he's still struggling a year from now it's fair game, some just believe it's too early. (Again, the article, not your comments) And right or wrong, I think many simply have flashbacks of Sanó, Gallo and MW that we find guys like Martin and LK somewhat refreshing to watch.  I know I do.  But your point is not dismissed at all.... and you may be spot on.

    entertaining discussion, thanks!




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...