Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Blame Game: Who Gets the Most Blame for the Twins’ Poor Start?


    Cody Christie

    The Twins are off to a horrendous start to the season, which leaves fans looking to point fingers. Who is to blame when the team fails to meet expectations?

    Image courtesy of Kim Klement Neitzel-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    Minnesota’s start to the season has been frustrating for all parties involved, including fans, players, and coaches. After their first playoff series win in two decades, the team seemed to be riding a wave of momentum. Instead, the club is near the bottom of the AL Central, considered one of baseball’s worst divisions. So, let’s sift through the organization and decide who (or what) deserves the most blame for the team’s underwhelming April.

    5. The Schedule
    Minnesota had a brutal stretch to start the year, including series versus three division winners from last year (Baltimore, Los Angeles, and Milwaukee). The Twins ended up going 2-6 versus those teams, including being outscored 22-to-9 by the Orioles in a three-game sweep. At Target Field, the team has also struggled to find ways to win consistently, which is rare even in poor seasons for the Twins. The schedule has been challenging to start the year, but the team has to play the games in front of them, and wins have been left on the table. 

    4. The Front Office
    Derek Falvey and company were put in a tough spot this season, with holes to fill on the roster, while also being given an ultimatum from ownership to cut payroll by $30 million. The front office used patience and creativity to build a roster that preseason projections had atop the AL Central. Trading Jorge Polanco, one of the team’s longest-tenured players, was a tough decision, but the team needed the financial flexibility to make other moves. Carlos Santana and Manuel Margot have failed to meet expectations, but the team rebuilt the bullpen into a strength. It looks like the front office’s biggest mistake was not adding more starting pitching depth. However, that might not have been possible with the team’s payroll cut. 

    3. The Coaching Staff
    Last week, Ted wondered if it was time for the Twins to shuffle the coaching staff. Rudy Hernandez, David Popkins, and Derek Shoman are the three coaches charged with working with Twins hitters and developing the team’s offensive approach. So far this season, the team's approach hasn't been successful, and there were similar signs last season. Minnesota struggled offensively through the first half of 2023, to the point where the veterans held a player’s only meeting to clear the air. In the second half, the Twins had one of the AL’s best offenses, propelled by a trio of rookies. Unfortunately, Royce Lewis is on the IL, and Matt Wallner has been demoted to Triple-A. There isn’t another set of rookies on the horizon to save the team this year. 

    2. The Ownership
    Payroll was the talk of the Twins offseason, because there were multiple layers to the team dropping a higher percentage of payroll than all but one AL rival (the Angels). Minnesota had a young core to their roster, which comes at a lower cost, and the team’s television situation was in flux. Eventually, the team renewed their deal with Diamond Sports, and some hoped it would allow the team to spend more. It never happened. A higher payroll could have allowed the Twins to add more depth to the starting rotation or find better veteran options than Santana and Margot. Target Field has been sparsely populated to begin the year, and owners have no one to blame but themselves.

    1. The Bats
    At some point, Twins players need to look in the mirror and be responsible for the on-field results. Minnesota’s offensive production has been near the bottom of the league for the entire season. Even when batters get on base, the team folds under the pressure of finding a way for them to score. Entering play on Tuesday, the Twins ranked last in MLB in nearly every category, with runners in scoring position. In 176 at-bats, Minnesota hit .142/.229/.244, with a 61-to-17 strikeout-to-walk ratio. Only two teams have an OPS below .600 with runners in scoring position: the Twins and the White Sox. It’s time to figure out how to score runs consistently, so the pitching staff has less pressure to put zeros on the board.


    How would you assign blame? Who is too high or too low? Add your rankings in the comments. 

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    I am patiently waiting for the OP's article on how the front office management has led to this 9 game winning streak and brought us within 3 games of the lead.   SSS are SSS.   Making significant claims based off of 20 games is silly.  Let alone when having several with injuries that were short term.  Now we will see how we do against better teams,  which is Chpettit argument.  

    6 hours ago, Hawkeye Bean Counter said:

    I am patiently waiting for the OP's article on how the front office management has led to this 9 game winning streak and brought us within 3 games of the lead.   SSS are SSS.   Making significant claims based off of 20 games is silly.  Let alone when having several with injuries that were short term.  Now we will see how we do against better teams,  which is Chpettit argument.  

    I love a good 10-game winning streak - are there bad ones?

    But this seems like the thread* to say that a better team beats the Twins today.  I mean, obviously a different team plays everything differently and nothing is comparable.  But if you're willing to play a what-if game on specific plays as today actually unfolded, a couple of defensive miscues and an ineffective performance by the White Sox bullpen were the difference.  A better opponent might have kept the lead.  I'm not willing to extrapolate to the rest of the season based on just this good stretch against lesser opposition.

     

    * Certainly not the game thread or the game wrap up.  Let's enjoy the win for what it actually was, a good comeback.

    19 hours ago, ashbury said:

    I love a good 10-game winning streak - are there bad ones?

    But this seems like the thread* to say that a better team beats the Twins today.  I mean, obviously a different team plays everything differently and nothing is comparable.  But if you're willing to play a what-if game on specific plays as today actually unfolded, a couple of defensive miscues and an ineffective performance by the White Sox bullpen were the difference.  A better opponent might have kept the lead.  I'm not willing to extrapolate to the rest of the season based on just this good stretch against lesser opposition.

     

    * Certainly not the game thread or the game wrap up.  Let's enjoy the win for what it actually was, a good comeback.

    We have beat up on 2 poor teams,  lost to a few decent teams early while still trying to find a footing with all the injuries.  I understand the consternation or elation of the fanbase over a few wins or losses is meaningless.  That is essentially my point, it is the absurdity of getting in a tizzy over an extremely small sample size of what is a very long season.  the 25% mark of games is where I think you can begin to make some decent observations of the team.  

    As to what if games, are we 10 games over .500 if we don't have the injuries early.   Also the white sox are a decent team,  the issue is their bullpen.  If they can find 2-3 decent arms to add to the bullpen they will actually put up a fight in most games.  I am glad we faced them when we did.  

    On 4/24/2024 at 3:33 PM, Jocko87 said:

    Now that we've gotten all the same old repeated front office wailing out of the way, I have a serious question.

    What could they realistically have done in the offseason that would offset the poor performances of the players who were already here to the point that this article would not be written?  I agree completely that they own this roster entirely, but we are talking performances several notches below even the most conservative projections all across the roster.  

    No matter how deeply (and incorrectly) you believe Falvine are pushing the buttons on pitch count and hitting plans, day to day on the field ain't on them. 

    This will be a good article to bookmark for 6 months from now.

    How bout 2 weeks

    Right now this looks like a pretty loaded team with decent depth at all spots except SP.  We have a couple minor leaguers moving up levels, and Festa may be seasoned enough later in the season,  but Varland can't cut it as a SP.  Revert him to RP and lets move on there.  The hitting approach has improved immensely.  When you are crushing Seattle you are doing something right.   

    The other argument that we play in a poor division is also falling by the wayside.  The central has 4 solid teams.   Currently record wise the Central has the 6, 8, 9, and 12 best records in baseball.  This isn't an easy division by any stretch of the imagination.  You also have the White Sox who have gone 3 and 3 since finishing playing us.   I think we will be glad that we got a lot of our games against them out of the way.    

    Kepler is continuing to be a stud this year.   SP is firing on all cylinders and the relief pitching could be dominant by mid season once we get everyone health and Staumont built back up.  

    Lastly most of the consternation in this thread is now looking pretty silly a few weeks later.  




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...