caninatl04 Verified Member Posted August 10, 2017 Posted August 10, 2017 A quick check http://www.milb.com/milb/stats/stats.jsp?sid=milb&t=l_tba&lid=130 shows that the DSL Twins are really hitting the cover off the ball. The team AVE/OBP/SLG/OPS versus team medians are: (AVE) .285 versus .243(OBP) .371 vs ..337(SLG) .417 vs. .326 {sic: yes, the majority of teams have SLG less than OBP)(OPS) .788 vs. .666 Four players of note (all with over 100 AB's) are: Name, position, OBP, SLG, AVE, OPS Yeltsin Encarnacion SS .445 .550 .349 .996Alberoni Nunez CF .416 .539 .359 .955Estamy Urena SS .397 .485 .331 .882 5Juan Martinez LF .406 .430 .318 .836 Yes, I am aware that this is based on a number of 17 and 18 year olds who are years away from even AA and 100 AB is 1/6th of a decent sample size. So, many grains of salt have been taken. But, hey, this can't be considered "bad" news.
Thrylos Old-Timey Member Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 Got to add 17 year old Wander Valdez who is hitting .282/.378.443, signed as a SS and has been playing in the infield corners (mainly at 3B), which is pretty interesting news as well. Encarnancion is a bit older (19) but he is having a break-through season. Nunez and Urena are 18. Martinez is 20. Another 17 year old of note is Venezuelan C Victor Heredia who is hitting .286 /.384/.381. They barely play catchers so nobody has those 100 PAs...
KirbyDaisy Verified Member Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 Why do they barely play catchers? Is it T-Ball?
Thrylos Old-Timey Member Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 Why do they barely play catchers? Is it T-Ball? Close. They have 5-6 catchers who all need to play and 17 and 18 year old kids need to take a break from catching. One thing that has to be mentioned is that DSL does not have a roster limit.
drivlikejehu Verified Member Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 DSL stats have practically no predictive value.
Thrylos Old-Timey Member Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 stats have practically no predictive value. FTFY
caninatl04 Verified Member Posted August 11, 2017 Author Posted August 11, 2017 DSL stats have practically no predictive value. I did mention the grains of salt Can't we just enjoy the moment?
walt-o-meal Provisional Member Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 So, many grains of salt have been taken. But, hey, this can't be considered "bad" news.Don't worry. Someone will tell you why this means we're the worst team in the league. I'll be in the corner toasting the win.
bird Verified Member Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 We may not be able to project much based on individual performances, but consider that the team has a record of 41-16. That's a .719 winning percentage. There are 40 teams competing in the DSL, and none of the other 39 teams has a better record. None of our counterparts in the AL Central is even fielding a team with a winning record. I don't know how much this all means, but it's not meaningless.
TRex Provisional Member Posted August 11, 2017 Posted August 11, 2017 DSL stats have practically no predictive value. ... I disagree (with tongue in cheek), in that they definitely have a NEGATIVE predictive value! Even 'good' prospects don't get off the island with horrible DSL stats.
Billy Amick Wichita Wind Surge - AA 1B/3B Despite hitting just .194, the 23-year-old ranks fourth in the Texas League in Home Runs (17) and sixth in RBI (50). Explore Billy Amick News >
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.