I believe that the cyclical theory explains part of the lack of success of the last 3 seasons, but my gut tells me that if the Twins had hired Billy Beane 10 years ago, there would have been a lot more success. Even if I am completely wrong about Beane being far more effective than Ryan/Smith, it seems short-sighted to me not to pursue every possible avenue of improvement, particularly hiring some people from organizations that have produced better results with less revenues. For example, it seems to me that the A's almost always have better pitching than the Twins. Why not try to hire a couple of their scouts and minor league coaches? If they bring good ideas, keep them. If not, then don't renew their contracts. I will be a Twins fan until I die, even if they lose 100 games per season forever. I spend a lot of energy and karma hoping that they will win. I buy their merchandise, watch their Menards commercials and attend their games. I feel that they owe us fans their best efforts, and that includes trying new things when the old things are producing record levels of TID (Twins Induced Depression). I also don't see how management can ignore the fact that other teams are doing new things and enjoying far greater success than the Twins. Yes, the innovation and the success MIGHT be purely coincidental, but it seems to me that it would be arrogant not to at least try the new things. Many of us fans give 110% of our hearts rooting for the Twins. After 3 years of TID, I think that we deserve 110% from the FO, and that includes being willing to admit that outsiders may know better.