Nobody "hopes" for injuries but they do happen. The best thing that happened to the Twins in 2014 was that that finally had sufficient organizational depth that when callups needed to be made they were bringing up legitimate prospects like Santana & Vargas (& even Polanco briefly) instead of guys like Doug Bernier. Pretty sure that the addition of one proven big league starter does not take this team from a position of having the worst starting pitching in the league last year to one of having such a wealth of talent that youngsters are getting blocked.
There is usually a pretty good trade market for excess starting pitching. Not that making no additions to the worst starting pitching staff in the league last year has yet convinced me that we have such an excess-or will in the next few years.
Our vaunted farm system is that vaunted but most of those pieces are not as big league ready as our fan base would like them to be. Thus the one year flyer on someone like Torii and possibly the same on guys like Anderson or Liriano. Some of us are perfectly content going with status quo and building for the future even if it means another sub .500 season but many are not.
You can never have too much pitching, especially quality starting pitching. If you do, there is always a market for it. I have no problem bringing in more arms and making every guy who shows up at Fort Meyers fight for a job.
No I can't say with certainty that Hughes would not have been even better with better outfield defense behind him any more than you can say that he would have. However, the fact that he pretty much put up the best year of his career leads me to believe that his ceiling wouldn't have been much higher.
Although most fans haven't figured it out yet, this team has been moving away from the "pitch to contact" philosophy for years. The problem is that it takes a long time to change an organizational philosophy and you do so from the the bottom of the system up. The power arms will start hitting the big leagues soon enough. Phil Hughes is somewhat of a high ball/fly ball pitcher and the outfield defense didn't negatively affect him. Why? Because he is a good pitcher, throws strikes and takes care of his own business.
Not only might he have peaked in 2014 he may have done so with a .242 average. Power can be fleeting. 23 home runs is not a lot for a .242 hitter especially when only 5 of them came after the All-Star break. Eddie Rosario, Jorge Polanco, Levi Michael, maybe even Nick Gordon. Lots of guys who may be quite capable of playing second base in the near future at the level that we've been led to believe Dozier is a near all-star at.
This has pretty much been the standard in "reporting" since the advent of the internet. Guys constantly report stuff that may or may not be factual because they don't want to be the guy who got scooped by someone else. "Brett Favre is going to retire." "Brett Favre is going to not retire." "Percy Harvin wants to be traded." "Vikings management wants to get rid of AP." "Vikings management wants to not get rid of AP." "Tim Tebow this." "Tim Tebow that." Aaron Hernandez may or may not have murdered someone." Sound familier?
He may have been a catcher when he signed the deal but NOBODY expected he would be a catcher for the last half of the deal. He probably just switched positions a year or two earlier than expected. Baseball's a funny game you don't always get paid WHEN you produce but when hit free agency. He got paid less than $18 million combined for the three years he won batting championships.
More often than not, teams that sign pitchers to contracts longer than 3 or 4 years, regret those contracts on the back end, regardless of the dollar amount of the contract. See Santana, Johan, New York Mets.