Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

John Bonnes

Site Manager
  • Posts

    6,794
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by John Bonnes

  1. Aaron and John discuss the Minnesota Twins spring invitees, the rest of the available free agents, Aaron's reason for going to New Zealand, Hammerheart's smokey experiments, John's brilliant baseball tournament, what happened to a bunch of ex-Twins, Aaron's bucket list and one million reasons to love you crazy listeners. You can listen by clicking below, or download us from: [PRBREAK][/PRBREAK] iTunes, Stitcher or find it at GleemanAndTheGeek.com.
  2. First, thanks to Thrylos and others for mentioning the platoon thing. It's a great point. I'd forgotten just how extreme he was. Of course, that means I really like him 2/3 of the time. Based on some research a while back, I think this injury thing is being overblown. He had a gruesome injury, took a while to come back, and had a concussion. The concerns from the DBacks are a concern. I'll also say that a lot of the games he missed with Boston were more due to that platoon split than injuries. So it comes down to this: what do you want to commit to a young, above average defensive shortstop who can mash vs RHs and is really bad vs LHs? I'll ask a second question: if he didn't cost a 2nd round pick, what would his market value be? Would 4/40 be out of the question then? If so, that's also a pretty tradable asses, and someone that you might get something better than a #2 pick for. I think Drew could be the guy this summer that we're all wondering why nobody else chased, similar to Willingham two years ago.
  3. The more I think about this, the more I like this idea. I really wonder if baseball might not be undervaluing Drew. The crickets surrounding him make me wonder if there are some things we don't know about with him, because I can't believe he hasn't got more interest. He is, seemingly, the whole package - offense, defense, youth - at a very hard position to fill. It makes the 2nd round pick scare seem a bit silly.
  4. I haven't been following this that closely, but weren't we led to believe everything was hunky-dory with Sano's elbow? Not according to this report, which is published on 1/6, though I'm not sure just how recently these quotes from Terry Ryan were made.... He also has some better news on Deduno. Can anyone who has been tracking this closer than I put this in context? http://network.yardbarker.com/mlb/article_external/sano_remains_shut_down_to_have_elbow_examined/15478484
  5. It's nice to see a national analyst remind us that half a year of struggles doesn't sink Gibson or Hicks. In both cases, they've faced a double-whammy: 1. They didn't experience immediate success and 2. They suddenly look squeezed at their position. I don't think #1 should surprise anyone too much. First of all, lots of guys struggle in their first half year. And in both cases, they faced significant challenges beyond that of players making their MLB debuts: Hicks skipped AAA while Gibson was working his way back from Tommy John and approaching (exceeding) an innings limit. #2 is bad luck for them. I'm not worried about Presley limiting Hicks playing time in CF; Presley isn't going to ever have the firepower to hold off Hicks if he starts tearing up AAA. I'm more worried about Hicks finding his way into the rotation, just because this organization is now so worried about it's rotation that you can see them hanging onto guys for too long, especially if they're paying them mutli-year deals.
  6. You can view the page at http://twinsdaily.com/content.php/2584-Gleeman-and-the-Geek-Episode-127-For-Medicinal-Purposes-Only
  7. Aaron and John take the podcast to Town Hall Lanes and talk about Eddie Rosario's "drug of abuse" suspension, Oswaldo Arcia's Winter League drama, turning 31 years old and putting yourself out there, persistent Matt Garza rumors,Twitter rankings, a crowded pitching roster, paying money to podcast, buying low, our bowling skills, Chris Kluwe and picking fights, Philadelphia for Christmas, and being out of options. You can listen by clicking below, download us from: iTunes, Stitcher or find it at GleemanAndTheGeek.com. [PRBREAK][/PRBREAK]
  8. This is the single best reason I've ever read for starting to post on a forum. I also like the idea of Garza and kicking the tires on Betemit, but I think this was the highlight of your post. :-)
  9. What this story drove home, to me, is how just about everything that could go wrong did go wrong with the starting rotation this year. When 80% of the guys you count on either take enormous steps (Diamond, Worley) backwards or aren't ready (Pelfrey, Gibson), then it's going to be a bad year. And when almost all of the fill-ins for them are absolutely dreadful - then things get even uglier. Just look at those guys. Deduno was good for a half year. Albers was competent for 1/4 of the year. The rest were brain-freezing bad. After writing this, I had one thought - it seems silly to say this, because it's what was said before last year, but here it is - it really can't get much worse. But it's true. It really can't.
  10. I'd agree with one letter change: I wouldn't want to ad more pitching at this point, unless it is a huge bargain or a clear upgrade.
  11. You can view the page at http://twinsdaily.com/content.php/2576-Top-13-Stories-3-Twins-Spend-On-Free-Agents
  12. Following their third straight year of having their season torpedoed by a dismal starting rotation, the Minnesota Twins went on a free agent spending spree like Twins fans had never seen before. Within a month, they committed $86M to four players, including handing out their two largest contracts in team history. Those increases were not just a result of the inflated price of free agents. The top contract, a 4-year, $49M commitment to Ricky Nolasco, more than doubled the biggest contract the Twins had previously paid to a free agent, which was signed by Josh Willingham for 3-years and $21 million. Within a week, they topped that contract again, enticing Phil Hughes to ink a 3-year deal for $24 million. But this isn’t just about the amount of money. This also ran contrary to the Twins historical attitude towards signing free agent starting pitchers. Their biggest FA pitcher contract before this year was their much maligned 2-year, $10M deal with Kevin Correia. Other than that, they’ve never paid more than $5M – and that was to Livan Hernandez in 2007. So the deals with Nolasco, Hughes and a subsequent 2-year, $11M deal with Mike Pelfrey represent the three biggest contracts they’ve ever given to starting pitchers – and they all happened within a month. During the press conference in which they signed Nolasco, Terry Ryan was asked by Wally Langfellow of Minnesota Score magazine whether or not this reflected a change in philosophy for the Twins. “No, This isn’t a change in philosophy. We’ve always said, if we need to do something... Now we have the resources to do it. There’s no doubt, if we were still in the Metrodome, this probably wouldn’t happen. But we’re in Target Field. We’ve got more revenue and resources, certainly. This is a nice opportunity. We need pitching. We went out and got it. As people recall, we tried to retain [Johan] Santana or retain Torii Hunter. To some extent, we just didn’t have the wherewithal. We would not hesitate to jump into free agency. I don’t think it’s the greatest path, because it is risky. We all know that. Free agency is not the answer. It’s a help and a supplement to a roster. But if you’re relying on free agency year-in and year-out, it’s not gonna work. Now we’re in a situation where we need help. We need immediate help. And this is the reason Ricky is sitting here. But I don’t see this as a big change.” I don’t know if it’s a change in philosophy, but something sure changed. Hopefully, 2014 will show it is a change for the better.
  13. ESPN's and Baseball Prospectus' Christina Kahrl just penned a story about how the Twins could surprise much like the Indians did last year. There's a lot she likes about the Twins, including the free agent signings this offseason.... She's also high on Pinto, finds a historical benefit to moving Maur to first, and doesn't want us to forget Aaron Hicks: http://espn.go.com/blog/sweetspot/post/_/id/43222/could-twins-be-the-surprise-team-of-2014
  14. You can view the page at http://twinsdaily.com/content.php/2564-Top-13-Stories-12-Drew-Butera-traded
  15. It’s possible that Minnesota Twins fans, and Twins Daily fans in particular, got a little too worked up about Drew Butera’s Twins career. I’ll grant you that. Nevertheless, it was big news when the Twins lone “trade deadline” move was trading Butera to the Dodgers. The immediate announcement was for a “player to be named later” who ended up being Miguel Subran, an A-ball pitching prospect.[PRBREAK][/PRBREAK] Certainly Butera hadn’t impacted the Twins much in 2013 – he had only three at-bats. (By the way, he had a similar impact with the Dodgers, totaling only seven at-bats with them.) And his usage in his three-and-a-half years with the major league club was relatively sparse. He totaled just 541 AB in his tenure. But it sure seemed more significant than that for anyone who lived through the 2011 season. That was the year Joe Mauer, with his career .323 batting average, was laid up for long spans with bi-lateral leg weakness. Butera ended up with the lion’s share of Mauer’s at-bats, posting a .167 batting average, even as the organization raved about his defense. It’s possible Butera's fans overrated that aspect of his game, while it’s also possible that Butera's critics underrated it, preferring to concentrate on his .181 career batting average. But both camps were encouraged by the return the Twins got from the Dodgers in the trade. The 19-year-old Sulbaran finished the year with a 2.96 ERA in Low A and 101K in 120 IP. He’s not a top prospect, but he’s the type to keep an eye on, as we wait to see if he can continue to develop as he matures. However, the excitement about this trade was mostly driven by the perception that the Twins were turning the page on an unhealthy infatuation with a player with limited upside. In a year with a quiet trade deadline, the organization seemed to recognize the right way to go and took a small step in that direction. Regardless of the return, that ended up being a big story in Twins Territory.
  16. You beat me to this by one an hour. I wholeheartedly agree. I like learning stuff about baseball and baseball players, and I'm doing so here.
  17. Gentlemen, play nice. Its certainly fair to say that it would be unfortunate to cut bait on some players who are young but facing struggles that young players can face. It's also certainly fair to wonder that if they can't beat out Correia, just how valuable will they really be? Either is defendable. What is not defendable is bickering and snide shots. Play nice.
  18. You can view the page at http://twinsdaily.com/content.php/2557-Gleeman-and-the-Geek-Episode-125-Mike-Pelfrey-Ryan-Doumit-Kurt-Suzuki
  19. Aaron and John meet for happy hour at Summit and midst tasting beers review the wisdom behind giving Mike Pelfrey a two-year deal, the impact of trading Ryan Doumit to the Braves and whether Kurt Suzuki will cost Josmil Pinto a roster spot. In between, they taste a Nate Dog, try a firkin, wonder about Danny Valencia's legacy, battle over double-dipping, forecast a move to Uptown and wish Byron Buxton a happy birthday. [PRBREAK][/PRBREAK]You can listen by clicking below, download us fromiTunes or Stitcher or find it at GleemanAndTheGeek.com.
  20. Over at Yahoo, Tom Schreier looks at my story that criticizes the Mike Pelfrey signing and instead views it as part of a good foundation for the 2014 Twins. He raises some good arguments that supporters of the signing would echo, focusing much of his energy on Pelfrey as part of a stable clubhouse. He also likes it in the context in which it was made, viewing Pelfrey as an additional piece at the end of a successful offseason rebuilding the pitching staff:
  21. This situation really strikes at the heart of baseball economics in Japan. It's a very interesting game of chicken going on. Essentially Rakuten could be paid $10M/year for the next two years for Tanaka - and they're only paying him $3M to play for them. And they say the $10M is not enough. That's telling. And now their counteroffer to their star is to pay him $7M, which is still less than they would be paid for him to not pitch for them, which they say is not enough. I don't really know what Rakuten wants to happen this offseason. There really is no end game for them that is better than having him pitch this year for $3M and then getting the same $20M next year that they're getting this year. I also find it interesting that in that scenario BOTH Rakuten and Tanaka are sharing the injury risk. If he suddenly contract an injury, they're both screwed.
×
×
  • Create New...