We can argue the difficulty ... but I'll disagree with you. They're all used to seeing 95. It's more difficult to bunt for a hit against a normal defense, I agree. You not only have to bunt, you have to bunt into a good spot. But none of that applies here. It can be bunted hard, soft, it doesn't matter. It can be a popup, line drive. It doesn't matter. In any case, What ISN'T arguable is that bunting a ball poorly to the left side is orders of magnitude easier than hitting a line drive. Why do you think teams have their pitchers bunt whenever there's a runner on with less than 2 out? They do so because it's easier than hitting. Those same pitches that are so tough to bunt are the same ones he's trying to hit. And we already have studies done that show a fair bunt against a shift has a better than .500 chance of being a hit. He should bunt. Often. If teams want to play four outfielders, with nobody on the left side of the infield, if he can get one down once in every 3 ABs, the team comes out ahead. What's the worst that can happen? He misses and it's strike one? He bunts foul? Again, strike one. He gets it fair, he's on first.