Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    48,925
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    340

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. Meh, I was curious how many teams have moved this many players.....and too lazy to look.....and in fairness, no way Jeff would know either.... mike sixel 9:30 Has any team unloaded as many players in July and August as MN has this year? Can they send Morrison or Forsythe or Santana out still and keep it going? They don't have many guys left to deal.... Jeff Sullivan 9:31 It was a roster made up of a whole bunch of contract-year players. This is what happens to those Wouldn't be shocked to see Ervin Santana on the move https://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/jeff-sullivan-fangraphs-chat-8-10-18/
  2. #$^@%&^@$$^@# Not only is Mejia hurt, but that means Austin will maybe sit on the bench while Morrison plays. I hope to be wrong about Austin sitting...
  3. An insane number of comments, given there is less chance of Mauer being traded than Brock playing for the Twins this year.....
  4. If there were no other options, was it really brilliant strategy, or just what was available? I think they did a lot right last off season, it just didn't work. But I also think they did little to nothing to fix the medium term, either by signing longer term FAs or trading for player(s). But, if there are no real options for long term deals, is it really genius to not do what you can't do? That was the point of the post.......maybe they signed a bunch of ST deals because there wasn't another option, not because that's what they wanted to do. I hope they are dealing from this super deep farm system for 1 MLB player with 3+ years of control this off season. No idea who, but a C, 3B, OF, 1B or SP would be nice. If not, it looks like another year of 1 year deals and hoping someone from the farm steps up.
  5. A QO will be worth 19MM by then.....at that point, depending on how things look, you maybe just take that 1 year deal. If he's this good next year, he'll get a deal, even as a 32 yo. Most athletes bet on themselves at this point, not all, but most. I think 4/80 gets it done. I don't think 3 years (as that's only a 2 year extension) gets is done, but it might. Kind of depends how long he wants to play.
  6. There isn't a national publication that even has them close, is there? I mean, FG has Arraez 31st on their list. I doubt that is some kind of bias.....
  7. Interesting on De Jong......I wonder if he should be in the Twins bullpen right now, and not Duffey?
  8. I have no idea why everyone is so sure Romero is going to be really good, he's not even in the majors right now........ I see no shot Gibson signs for a low deal, this is his last shot to make big money. You either have to give him years, or big money, or both, imo, to get him to sign.
  9. I gotta say, I'm happy Austin is coming up before September. I have no idea if he's going to be good or not, but they need to know. He hit ok when up earlier this year, not great, not bad. Duffey? I hope they throw CB after CB and see what happens. Good luck to both of them!
  10. It also glosses over that they went low risk, low reward, by not signing the best FAs (though they certainly tried to sign Darvish).
  11. Wow. Unexpected. Not sure how I feel about the return. Make McGill the closer please. Keep May for high leverage. Or maybe move Reed to closer?
  12. Sano, Kepler, Austin, Garver, that's pretty easy, and gives you position flexibility. Maybe Rooker is ready at some point. It's very unlikely that group produces less than Mauer.
  13. I'm not sure how anyone can reach that conclusion based on the past 12 months. I'd love to hear your rationale.
  14. No. Still puts him below median at 1B.......but he's not hitting close to that this year, so I'm not sure why we'd expect that. He also didn't hit that high in 2016. 2017 appears to be the outlier.
  15. I admit it isn't a realistic plan, at this point. More hope.
  16. It is possible the Twins need Kepler in CF next year too, which puts a small cramper in my plan.....
  17. I don't know hte rosters well, but if there is a bad team with a decent OG, I'm offering a 2nd rounder and one of our bad OGs for him (assuming he has 2-3 years of control left).......Heck, I'd have done that before this injury.
  18. We'll never know, because he'll stay at SS until they move him.....if you know what I mean. Take Harper, the Nats moved him off of C partly to get him up sooner, rather than later. I'm guessing that Lewis could learn CF in half a year....but how long until he is a really good SS? I have no idea....
  19. this I agree with, but that's not on the teams, or the nerds. btw, I'm shocked a jock would even say this kind of thing....
  20. long read, on a short play.... https://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/willians-astudillo-pulled-off-the-hidden-ball-trick/
  21. No such thing as a bad 1 year deal, after all.....
  22. Odd, who would have predicted not using high picks ever on the OL would backfire someday?
  23. The disappointing thing about the late losses is that the FO signed Rodney, Reed, Duke to add to what they already had, and the bullpen still isn't working out......
  24. literally not my point....where is the complaint about Wilson......
  25. If Garver was catching, I'd be reading about how he cost the team with his arm.....or something....
×
×
  • Create New...