how about one of them being the plan? And, one of them or Duffey or Haley being the 2nd choice? NO ONE is saying get rid of all the veterans. I take great umbrage to people saying deciding to go young is a slogan, not a strategy. Here is how the STRATEGY could be different: 1. Don't sign Gimenez, because you want to give Murphy one more chance, and have Garver in AAA to take over. If you do sign a guy like that, make it a guy where the primary plan is to have him in AAA as insurance. That's a plan. A strategy. Not a slogan. 2. Don't sign another veteran SP, especially one who is old and hasn't been good for 4 years. Plan to have one of May, Berrios, Meija, Duffey, or Haley as your 5th starter, with the next guy on the list as plan B. That's a plan. A strategy. Not a slogan. Maybe even pencil Hughes in as a starter, but not pen, in case his velocity is off. Heck, maybe decide to move him to the bullpen, and start a young guy. If the young guy fails, you can move Hughes back to the rotation if needed, especially for a spot start or two. 3. Don't sign 4 veteran RPs, decide you'll have Chargois on the roster based on what you've seen so far. Decide Haley is in the bullpen. Give every young guy that you think is close a real shot at making the roster. It's about the opportunity you create, or your plans you set. NONE of that is a slogan, it is all an actual strategy to put youth first. I keep reading "what if they fail"? As many of you have posted, if the youth fail that they've drafted, signed, or traded for, it won't matter who they sign, they need the youth to be good if they are going to be good. So please, don't condescend to me about youth being a slogan and not a strategy. We've seen plenty of teams go young over the years. We've even seen the Twins do it the last time they built their core.