Jump to content
If free agency is too rich for your blood, click here for the 35 players most likely to be traded this offseason. ×
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

DutchFarmer

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    67

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by DutchFarmer

  1. DutchFarmer
    My link didn't have any analysis attached so I don't know what you're alluding to. Furthermore, I don't need to conduct any analysis just because you said so. Do I need to also respond to Daily Beast articles? HuffPo too? How about People's World? I think it's appropriate to discuss politics on this site if politics directly impacts baseball, so I'm glad this thread is here; however, if you're going to assert a point be prepared to discuss the original source. Everything else is intentional distraction.
  2. DutchFarmer
    Moving the goalposts again... To be clear, you (and assume others too) don't find the actual original text of the bill to be a substantial enough source. The bill itself is not a good enough source...unreal. Instead, you'd prefer to use a left-wing paraphrase of the bill? The argument thus far is: Leftwing: "You're a racist because you support this bill requiring election monitors to live in the county of the election!" Rightwing: "The bill doesn't mention race. Did you read the bill? Here it is. Perhaps we should talk about specifics in the bill before asserting ill intent?" Leftwing: "I don't need to read the bill, other people who agree with me politically already provided talking points so you'll have to refute those talking points before I take you seriously." Yeah, that's a strawman, I get it, but that's honestly what it feels and looks like.
  3. DutchFarmer
    Again, you specifically asked for sources. Now you're moving the goalposts to a nebulous "listening to those who are impacted" standard. Here's the actual text of the bill. If you choose to read it you'll notice that it's filled with rather mundane rule changes to a pre-existing law. Things such as limiting the ability for an election superintendent to receive donations from partisan groups, and altering the process of an election board, and how a poll watcher must reside in the county either of the precinct or a county bordering. The narrative of this bill being "racist" is exactly that, a narrative, and the narrative itself is ironically racist in that it makes the argument of, "This group of people - based solely off of the pigmentation of their skin - can't vote if you don't allow free water." (and other equally specious arguments)
  4. DutchFarmer
    You asked for a source. Also, as the moderator is just seems prudent to not take a side.
  5. DutchFarmer
    I used to be a mega-fan, commonly listened to nearly every game on the radio and - as is likely the case with most in the Twins Daily community - could name most minor leaguers and for sure every member of the active roster, including most of their stats. Despite that, last season I only watched/listened to parts of about 3 games. I just generally lost interest due to the shutdown teaching me I didn't really need sports, plus the Twins/baseball getting political, plus the rule changes. I still check in from time to time (hence my comment here) but I've gone from checking Twins Daily everyday (no pun intended) to once every few weeks. Get the game back to what it previously was and I might come back...
  6. DutchFarmer
    One positive byproduct of Maeda being a Twin is that hopefully it helps crack the door open for new Japanese talent to come here. I have no idea to what extent having a fellow countryman on a team would matter, but I would imagine it's a positive. There appear to be a healthy number of higher-end Japanese players coming to the states in the next year or two. https://www.fantasypros.com/2020/02/2020-mlb-top-international-prospects/
  7. DutchFarmer
    Is it too much to ask for the FO to be perfectly prescient of which prospects will turn into stars and then trade the other prospects for current stars?
  8. DutchFarmer
    This was an extremely educational write-up. Well done.
  9. DutchFarmer
    Dome dog please
  10. DutchFarmer
    Would like both of these a heck of a lot better if there were reasonably priced team options for 2021 attached. I suppose I'm happy in the sense that there appears to be reason for hope that these turn out to be bargains (even if the odds don't seem really high).
  11. DutchFarmer
    Best post in this thread.
  12. DutchFarmer
    Completely agree.... though I must admit I'm very much looking forward to seeing the shiny new participation trophy sitting next to the 87 and 91 world championship trophies during my next visit to Target Field.
  13. DutchFarmer
    One time - 2011 - have they spent in these ranges - and to their credit this one year they spent beyond 52%. Other than that, my quick glance at the numbers tells me they have been under 50% every other year. It's time, we have young, controllable, inexpensive talent to make a run, now let's supplement with a bonafide star. It'd be fantastic to see them go get the level of player we simply don't have anywhere in our org - a la Strasburg or Rendon. https://www.statista.com/statistics/196669/revenue-of-the-minnesota-twins-since-2006/ https://legacy.baseballprospectus.com/compensation/index.php?team=MIN&cyear=2019
  14. DutchFarmer
    I'm not disagreeing about their relative spending vs. other teams, it's a related but largely inconsequential point. Their spending has not been in the range that was pitched as one of the primary purposes for needing a publicly-funded stadium (50-52%). Considering that, I think it fully justified that some folks might want to see them pony-up from time to time.
  15. DutchFarmer
    To be fair, your response doesn't really address my points, which are in relation to the implications given during the publicly funded stadium debate, in that the stadium would allow the team to increase spending with a loose target of 50-52%. There have been many scenarios over the past roughly 10 years where they could have spent more (according to the % of revenue model noted above) but didn't whatever reason. With all that being said, I've never been one who is really passionate on either side of this "Twins don't spend enough/Twins can't spend more" argument so I feel weird getting into it; but when trying to be objective about the topic it's just difficult to buy into the notion that the Twins are spending what they could. I don't know, spending more doesn't necessarily always equate to more wins (Chris Davis), but sometimes it does (Max Scherzer).
  16. DutchFarmer
    What's difficult about this subject, as a Twin's fan and resident of MN, is that the message in the leadup to the Twin's stadium funding debate was that a stadium would allow them to spend more. The general theory was that they could/would spend 50-52% of revenues on salaries. I don't have the data on hand at the moment, but if memory serves me correctly they have yet to come very close to that 52%. So while it can be accepted that we are a smaller market than the NYs or LAs of the league, it shouldn't stop us/them from spending quite a bit more than we are now, given that was the rationale behind public funding of the stadium.
  17. DutchFarmer
    Or we take on the Ian Desmond contract along with Gray and give them just 1 or 2 of the 4. We then non-tender Cron.
  18. DutchFarmer
    He will be on the roster. 99% (1% is in case of injury) certain.
  19. DutchFarmer
    Do you think the Royals version of this site had their headline say something like, "Royals swept in an unfortunate Smeltzing accident."?
  20. DutchFarmer
    What should we be expecting from Ober in the future? I mean, does his stuff indicate a future of domination such as he's put up in the minors this year? I seem to recall a number of minor league pitchers who fizzled out (I believe Scott Diamond was one of them?) despite killing it against lesser competition.
  21. DutchFarmer
    Probably an unpopular opinion but I'm totally cool if they do nothing.
  22. DutchFarmer
    1,000x yes
  23. DutchFarmer
    I love that we have a player with 4 first names (Willy Joe Garry Junior). It's a battle between him and Badoo for best name in the system, IMHO.
  24. DutchFarmer
    On a related note, it doesn't appear that the Twins are the favorites to sign any of the top 30 2019 IFAs. http://m.mlb.com/prospects/2019?list=int ***Check that, number 8 - Emmanuel Rodriguez
  25. DutchFarmer
    Yeah, you're likely right. Though, to be fair, due to pro-ration it would be a lot less. Additionally, I'm guessing Strasburg opts out this offseason, so the future allotment would also be a lot less. With that being said, it was just a pie-in-the-sky thought...
×
×
  • Create New...