Good post- you made numerous good points- well worth the read. I would just point out that an example of the Twins "great balancing act" meant holding back the key catalyst for the club, Santana, and secondary catalyst, Escobar, even when it was obvious that "He's my starting shortstop", Pedro Florimon, was most certainly not ready to play coming out of ST. Gibson was a less than 50-50 guy to make the rotation, only Diamond's ST implosion opened the way for Kyle to get a starting spot. The Twins also decided that a guy that hadn't been healthy enough to play in 2 years and never played in the OF, was somehow good enough to become the backup CFer- (and then by keeping the guy, supposedly for team chemistry purposes, the "chemist" up and quit on them and ultimately caused them to lose 2 more depth CFers), along with another guy who publicly let it be known that he HATED TF and was already on a severe downward career path. And the Twins should have known what they had in Hicks based on 2013, coupled with his refusal to do what the team asked of him in the offseason. I don't see how these moves can be regarded as anything but poor evaluations of each potentiality. I've provided examples that other successful clubs use to promote their young prospects, as for the Twins, they might want to examine how this success was achieved.