When a season is lost, you begin to wonder what there is to look forward to. That could be player development, win streaks, or the draft.
So, tanking.
Credit to UrinatingTree for making that intro.
As you all know, the draft order in the first round is basically the league’s standings in Win%, but reversed. Hence, the team with the worst record in baseball gets the first overall pick. The team with the 2nd worst record in baseball gets the 2nd overall pick, 3rd worst record gets the 3rd overall pick, and so on.
Thus, some teams have gotten the idea to not play to win, but to play to improve their draft position (or in simple terms, play to lose).
And if you think about it, it kind of makes sense. If your season is lost, winning games is meaningless in the long run. However, draft position is not meaningless. It can be meaningful in the long run. So in that sense, tanking would make sense.
However, you can also make an argument that tanking “disrespects the integrity” of the game. Everyone in a Jersey or Headset should be giving it their all. Plus, tanking could result in a drop in attendance, and a loss in revenue.
The reason I’m talking about this is that the Twins had a choice earlier in the season. They were 12-24 and 26-41. Last place throughout the year. They had a chance to bring out the tanks to get a top three pick. However, they didn’t. Disclaimer: I’m not criticizing that choice.
But we have seen teams in the past who have been in lost seasons who did take this route. You could argue the Jaguars did it in 2020 by benching Gardner Minshew in favor of starting Mike Glennon (who was worse than Minshew) in route to a 1-15 record and the #1 Overall Pick.
I want to know what side of this y’all are on. Do you believe in the technical long run advantages of tanking to improve draft position or do you not? Do you believe that tanking to improve draft position disrespects the integrity of the game or do you not? Please share your opinion down below: