Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

ashbury

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    42,493

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    471

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by ashbury

  1. ashbury
    If the dyslexia is bad enough, everything sǝɯʎɥɹ.
  2. ashbury
    "The Truth will set you free"? / OK, that's bad, even by my standards
  3. ashbury
    This guy was Money:
  4. ashbury
    Disapproves: / Slim Pickens, of the past
  5. ashbury
    Minor league teams change their affiliations periodically to address perceived indifference by their major league counterparts. Do you want to be the GM that gets stuck with the substandard facilities1 that your players will hate at the AAA site in Las Vegas, because every other AAA owner said no thanks to you? We nearly lost Rochester a few seasons ago. 1 Last I heard
  6. ashbury
    I should bring this to the attention of the local SABR chapter, which is named after him. They might want to do a memorial service or something.
  7. ashbury
    My favorite Tom Kelly quote from ST a couple of years ago, which I have to trot out every now and then: "let's try to keep the 360s to a minimum, OK?" / it's why they pay TK the big bucks
  8. ashbury
    Props to a valuable and long-term member of the bullpen.
  9. ashbury
    ... on a team destined to win only 66, after having won 63 the year before. The dynamics then don't give much guidance on how the roster would be managed when it matters. The very worst case is that a (25-man, 40-man) roster problem, if any, is solvable with money. The Twins have this luxury for the coming several seasons.
  10. ashbury
    Doesn't the example you raised earlier of Blackburn counteract this concern? If you find you have an excess resource, you pick the one performing most poorly, try to trade him, then waive/DFA him and hope someone picks up the contract, and at worst you have waivers and you just demote him to AAA and eat the contract and keep him stashed for an emergency. If the Twins were strapped for cash, it would be different. But how did Nick Blackburn's contract impede anything the past two years, or how would (pick a name, let's say Hughes)'s untradeable contract for 3 years impede the rebuild now?
  11. ashbury
    Bet ya didn't know Zack Greinke ever pitched for the Twins. Or that he ever smiled.
  12. ashbury
    Major leaguer, or catcher on your company softball team?
  13. ashbury
    If it walks like a duck, and kwak's like a duck... / sorry, kinda had to
  14. ashbury
    I failed to notice that #23 was traded for #23 that year. / wait' date=' what?[/size']
  15. ashbury
    This.
  16. ashbury
    I'm no hitting coach but I think part of his problem might be he's choking up too much on the bat.
  17. ashbury
    The fourth of his five career home runs. (So far. But I wouldn't bet much on his getting another shot at making it six.)
  18. ashbury
    "Rodent Soccer - Catch The Fever!" / I mean the rodent is the opponent, and they both try to kick an acorn into the goal
  19. ashbury
  20. ashbury
  21. ashbury
    Trying to cozy up to one of the moderators with a Dozierzie avatar will do you no good.
  22. ashbury
    Completely a side point, but MLBTR has a series on who is out of options on each team. They've only done half the major league teams so far, but what jumps out at me so far is the correlation between a team being good and having few players out of minor league options. Is this a simple byproduct of their prospects coming up to the majors and being good right away? In a related way, is this a byproduct of not needing to rush youngsters? Is this a conscious and on-going strategy of the front office to trade away or dump most players who will soon cause them to have to juggle their plans? Is the presence of a lot of these guys just the mark of a team having been in the bottom echelon for a while and their roster of upcoming players isn't settled yet? I don't know, but to see the Cardinals (0) and the Tigers (3) with so few makes me look forward to a day when numbers of options isn't an issue for the Twins (8) either. (Exceptions like the Indians (2) and the Pirates (10) need to be taken into account in forming a real theory about this. But then I look at the Cubs(11) and say, nope, I don't want lots of guys with no options, no way no how.)
  23. ashbury
    Even a designated hitter sometimes misses.
  24. ashbury
    Bonus baby?
  25. ashbury
    Embarrassing brain cramp fixed for posterity, above.
×
×
  • Create New...