It may be that Dozier was aiming more for a 'Don't worry about me, I'm not hurt and I'm not down on myself' sort of thing, and it came out more like 'It's just bad luck, leave me alone'. He's been around long enough and through enough without being a locker room liability that I'm completely willing to give him the benefit of the doubt when it comes to his dealings with the media and his overall attitude. What I would have trouble with is if he presents the same 'I'm fine' attitude in response to the Twins asking him to make some major adjustments to his approach at the plate. His poor performance is rapidly approaching the point where any suggestion short of taking up switch-hitting should not be regarded as too radical to try, even for a veteran like Dozier. He would NOT be approaching that point, at least in my mind, were it not for the fact that Dozier has been, by some indications, skating on relatively thin ice dating all the way back to his initial success at the major league level. Over a year ago, in the context of a possible Dozier contract extension, Fangraphs ran a nice profile of him. But it included one troubling bit of evidence about the sustainability of his approach. While it's been widely know that Dozier has been a pull hitter, the article explained that not only is he one of the most extreme in baseball, but that the others in that group almost all profile as exactly the same thing: aging power hitters trying to milk a few more homers out of the final, 'white dwarf' stage of their career. I like Dozier immensely as a ballplayer, on balance I liked the idea of extending him, and I don't think he's doomed to an early flame-out. But when a player who profiles so strongly like an aging power hitter both struggles and doesn't fully acknowledge that struggle, it's at least some cause for concern that he's not ready to fix the problem if that means dropping the approach of an aging power hitter.