Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins Minor League Coverage

    Gabriel Gonzalez’s Future with the Twins is Getting Complicated

    A disappointing season and an increasingly crowded outfield have created some questions about Gabriel Gonzalez’s place in Minnesota’s long-term plans—like whether that place even exists.

    Sam Caulder
    Image courtesy of Matt Marton-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    The Minnesota Twins saw several of their top prospects make their way to Target Field in 2026. One of those prospects (but the least-discussed, perhaps) is outfielder Gabriel Gonzalez. He ranks as the Twins’ No. 9 organizational prospect, after coming over from Seattle in 2024 as part of the Jorge Polanco trade. While he did make his big-league debut this year, the season as a whole wasn’t exactly what people were expecting from the young outfielder.

    Gonzalez appeared in just seven major-league games, logging only 11 plate appearances. His Triple-A numbers are probably more relevant when evaluating his development, and they weren’t particularly inspiring. With the St. Paul Saints, Gonzalez slashed .255/.324/.421. When you compare those numbers to what he did a year ago, it becomes a little more concerning. Although it came in a much smaller sample, Gonzalez slashed .316/.358/.504 in 2025. He was hitting the ball harder, getting on base more often and generally looking like the offensive player the Twins hoped they were getting when they acquired him. This year, that wasn't so.

    Interestingly, his overall batted-ball profile was nearly identical in 2026. The difference was that he simply wasn’t getting the same results, and his quality of contact didn’t take the step forward many were hoping to see. In fact, it trended in the wrong direction. It was a disappointing year for Gonzalez, considering where he stood in the organization entering the season. With guys like Walker Jenkins and Emmanuel Rodriguez getting more run than Gonzalez late in the season (along with Luke Keaschall beginning his transition to the outfield), things have gotten a little more complicated.

    What, then, does Gonzalez’s future with the Twins look like? It’s possible he does still have one. But if he’s going to remain with the Twins long-term, it’s unlikely to come as a full-time outfielder. Along with Jenkins, Rodriguez and Keaschall, Byron Buxton is obviously still in the mix for outfield playing time. Trevor Larnach could also be back next year (although there’s no guarantee of that). Austin Martin remains under team control, as well.

    Playing time in the outfield is going to be sparse, and it seems like the Twins are aware of that, too. Gonzalez made 44 starts at first base for the Saints this season, which could be an indication of where the organization sees his future. He doesn’t have typical first baseman size at just 5-foot-11. Nor does he have the typical power profile associated with the position. But with some uncertainty surrounding the Twins’ long-term outlook at first base, it’s entirely possible that Gonzalez could transition into more of a first baseman. He could also remain an option in the outfield against left-handed pitchers, giving the Twins some flexibility in how they use him.

    The most likely scenario is that Gonzalez doesn’t fit into the Twins’ long-term plans. The biggest concern is that he hasn’t shown an ability to consistently make hard contact. His average exit velocity in St. Paul this year was just 86.2 MPH, while his hard-hit rate was 30.6%. Those numbers make it difficult to envision him becoming an everyday offensive contributor, particularly if the Twins are asking him to play first base. He doesn’t have the speed or defensive prowess to make up for that lack of offensive production in the outfield corners. If he’s not providing much impact with the bat, there aren’t enough other tools to make up for it. That leaves the Twins with an interesting decision to make.

    If I’m Minnesota, I’d at least be seeing what I could get for Gonzalez on the trade market, either by himself or as part of a larger package. If there’s an opportunity to turn him into a bullpen arm or a catcher/first baseman who can help the team compete in 2027, that’s a move worth exploring. I was very much in on Gonzalez entering this season. I thought he was one of the safer young bats in the organization, and there was a legitimate reason to believe 2026 could be the year he started to establish himself as a future piece for the Twins. Instead, he took a step backward.

    That doesn’t mean Gonzalez can’t turn things around. He’s still young, and there’s plenty of time for him to develop into the player the Twins originally envisioned. But the organization also has to consider where the roster is headed and whether Gonzalez is still the best use of a roster spot. He might be more useful as a trade chip.

    At the end of the day, you have to do what’s best for the team. With the Twins trying to get back into contention in 2027, that might just mean getting what they can for Gonzalez before it’s too late.


    Interested in learning more about the Minnesota Twins' top prospects? Check out our comprehensive top prospects list that includes up-to-date stats, articles and videos about every prospect, scouting reports, and more!

    View Twins Top Prospects

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Yasser Mercedes

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, OF
    On Thursday in the Fall League, Mercedes went 2-for-4 with his first double and his first homer run of the AFL season.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    20 hours ago, MackMan said:

    Yeah. They haven't had a real direction in almost 15-16 years. I thought they were figuring it out come 2023 after our post-season series win. Then they decided to cut budget and hope that similar results were going to happen. Then a fire sale of our BP in 2025 really showed us they wanted to rebuild. Then 2026 came around and the AL was really weak and it made us look really good compared to a lot of teams. So I don't even know what to expect for 2027 other than expect the unexpected

    Same.

    I was really wary about the re-signing of Correa, but I could kinda see a plan in place. Take a few lumps, get a few key prospects to the cusp, bring in a top free-agent to fill a huge hole, make the playoffs regularly and then let the excitement generate more revenue. 

    In 2023, you could kind of see that all coming to fruition. But then they realized they had spent too much, and they panicked and retreated. Basically, the worst possible move for the moment.

    Since then, it's been a mess. To be fair, it was probably going to be a mess regardless. It's bad enough to have Buxton as an annual question mark. It would have been worse to have Correa be your salary centerpiece and perpetually hurt. Just as the 2022 medical reports suggested he would be.

    The answer is: get smarter. Smart organizations are flexible. They weather storms. They don't put all of their eggs in one free agent basket. They don't sign a Correa - they develop a Correa. I think attendance would already be league average here if baseball fans could sense an intelligent plan being put in place.

    2 minutes ago, LastOnePicked said:

    Same.

    I was really wary about the re-signing of Correa, but I could kinda see a plan in place. Take a few lumps, get a few key prospects to the cusp, bring in a top free-agent to fill a huge hole, make the playoffs regularly and then let the excitement generate more revenue. 

    In 2023, you could kind of see that all coming to fruition. But then they realized they had spent too much, and they panicked and retreated. Basically, the worst possible move for the moment.

    Since then, it's been a mess. To be fair, it was probably going to be a mess regardless. It's bad enough to have Buxton as an annual question mark. It would have been worse to have Correa be your salary centerpiece and perpetually hurt. Just as the 2022 medical reports suggested he would be.

    The answer is: get smarter. Smart organizations are flexible. They weather storms. They don't put all of their eggs in one free agent basket. They don't sign a Correa - they develop a Correa. I think attendance would already be league average here if baseball fans could sense an intelligent plan being put in place.

    Yes. I was ecstatic that we actually were willing to spend some money on a player to help benefit our team. At the time it seemed like a huge deal that we did because the FO showed they were committed to winning at this point in time. The issue of course was that Correa was not worth that price tag we gave him. Yes, his offense was good for a shortstop, but wasn't elite. His defense and anchorability was what the Twins were targeting. We haven't had a solid and consistent shortstop in a VERY long time. If he got some resemblance of post-season Correa, thats a win. Other than that, the Twins and the FO were okay with a .260+ hitter, with a 20ish HR season, that anchored the middle of the diamond. 

    Yes, they made the worst possible move in back tracking and trying to shed payroll. They should have just stayed pat. They would have at least gotten less criticism if they had kept payroll similar to what they currently had at the time. The downside is that Correa (Buxton too) are not built for the colder weather in MN where they need to be healthy all the time in order to perform properly. If we were to make it to the playoffs with them, how well are their past injuries going to hold up as the weather starts to get colder? I'm guessing a struggle for the most part. 

    Now we just need a change in Farm Director or have a better scouting team that can work to identify players of interest, scout them accurately, and then have them deliver. Somehow the Guardians and the Rays get these arms that all other 28 teams overlooked and make them into perennial All-Stars then ship them out when they're worth their most and restock their farm system. I know thats what Falvey and Levine were trying to do, but their draft picks just weren't turning out. They were missing WAY more than they were winning. 

    23 hours ago, Andy MacPhail said:

    GG was hyped up to the Twins & they bought into it. Twins continued that hype to the fanbase. GG is on the long list of Twins' favorites that haven't panned out. GG is slow, doesn't have a good glove, doesn't have good jumps & routes. He's a big liability in the OF. Maybe that's why he's playing more 1B where his only defensive talent (arm) doesn't come into play.

    GG is a free swinger & pitchers especially MLBer, will quickly take advantage of it. Twins have had a knack of picking losers & sticking with them. GG has been on the MLB's top 100 prospects & currently on the Twin's top 10. GG is a loser, finally take advantage of his hype, & trade him for someone good who serves a purpose. Buxton is our only true RH hitting OFer, Martin should be at 2B & Keaschal at 1B, they are out there because of need. Twins have a big need for RH hitting OFers but GG isn't the answer. The situation is simple, you trade him. But Twins & some fans complicate it.

    I know you enjoy calling others losers. Why? He got a reasonable guess but I won't share it. But calling someone a loser is against TD policy. Reflects bad on you as well. Thankyou

    19 minutes ago, Twinsrtheworst said:

    I know you enjoy calling others losers. Why? He got a reasonable guess but I won't share it. But calling someone a loser is against TD policy. Reflects bad on you as well. Thankyou

    Thank you for bringing that to my attention, sorry to have offended you. TD often use winners & losers in their evaluations. That's my intention in the use of the word. In life he's not a loser, he's a winner, just in the fact that he's made it this far. But like me, he's not a true MLBer. In the future, I'll try to use a different word in my evaluations.

    23 hours ago, jmlease1 said:

    I don't think Gonzalez's future with the Twins is all that complicated at all. He's still got a couple of option years left and if he shows he can hit in AAA in 2027 then he's going to get opportunities in MLB, whether it's corner OF, DH, or 1B because there will almost certainly be a need for his RH bat.

    Maybe he makes it, maybe he doesn't, but he's actually reasonably well-positioned. He needs to take a step forward; he didn't have a particularly good season at the plate, but he's also only 22 and had barely played in AAA. This isn't a guy who is 26 or repeating AAA for the 3rd time. And I'm not concerned that he didn't immediately produce in his late-season cup of coffee, because that's really what it was: he didn't exactly get much playing time. (7 PA's in 5 games is nothing) He'll very likely start next season in AAA, unless he's destroying it in spring training (which would be great) and there's not exactly a 40-man crunch right now for the Twins.

    GG's future with the Twins doesn't make my Top Ten list of off-season things to think about, let alone be concerned about,.

    It's the options years left that give him value as a call up if someone gets injured. 

    Right now, being an outfielder in the Twins system is a prospect without a job. Jenkins and Rodriguez are sure bets. Buxton is still around. Roden is cheap. Martin is unqiue. Larnach and Wallner are close to being set free, although Wallner is still inexpensive. You have GG and Mendez in the minors. Rosario needs to be protected from the Rule 5. Kendle, O'Daniel, Winkor are in the wings, 

    But the question remains, "Who's On First!" Sabato? Lewis? One of the above?

    On 10/8/2026 at 11:54 AM, Andy MacPhail said:

    Thank you for bringing that to my attention, sorry to have offended you. TD often use winners & losers in their evaluations. That's my intention in the use of the word. In life he's not a loser, he's a winner, just in the fact that he's made it this far. But like me, he's not a true MLBer. In the future, I'll try to use a different word in my evaluations.

    All good, I appreciate your response. I should have read it differently. And hey, none of us are perfect anyway. Have a good one.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...