Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    The Twins Should Be Shopping Ervin Santana


    Nick Nelson

    Twins general manager Thad Levine has not been secretive regarding his pursuit of top available pitching talent. He recognizes a need to bolster the front end of his rotation.

    In the Offseason Handbook, I wrote a blueprint suggesting that the Twins trade Ervin Santana and sign Yu Darvish to replace him as the club's veteran No. 1 starter.

    Today I'll dig deeper into the rationale behind dealing Santana, because while it's partially about clearing his 2018 salary to make a big-money signing more palatable, there are other factors to consider as well.

    Image courtesy of Rick Osentoski, USA Today

    Twins Video

    First, let's acknowledge the obvious: Santana was spectacular in 2017. He had arguably the best season for a Twins starting pitcher since Johan left town. Big Erv made the All Star team, finished seventh in Cy Young voting, and buoyed an otherwise shaky rotation.

    But that's exactly why his value is at an all-time high. Historically, career years at the age of 34 don't often become trends, and Santana's in particular carried many indicators of being aided by luck (evidenced by a 4.46 FIP).

    He's still a reliable, proven workhorse and that's why he has value to any team – including the Twins – but right now his value is peaking. Derek Falvey talked when he came aboard about being "opportunistic," and this would be the definition.

    Santana has only one guaranteed year left on his contract, but here's the thing: His 2019 option triggers if he throws 200 innings next year. In the event he regresses to his FIP – or even his 4.02 career ERA – but still reaches that milestone, you're locked into him for $14 million at age 36, right in the middle of a peak window for winning with Byron Buxton and Co.

    Santana's team-friendly contract can turn into a hindrance rather quickly.

    It might be easier to sell ownership on a $150 million splash for Darvish (already named by Levine as a priority target) if you can get that potential $27 million commitment to Santana off the books. And swapping out a 34-year-old with one/two years of team control for a 31-year-old with five/six makes plenty of sense in the greater team-building scheme.

    But even beyond the financials, there is an obvious sell-high angle at play here. Of course, other GMs will notice that as well. You can only be opportunistic if there are opportunities to exploit.

    Who might actually be interested in Santana, and at what price?

    In my mind, it won't be a World Series contender looking to add that final rotation piece. Many can afford to pursue a top free agent arm, and few would actually view the veteran starter as a meaningful upgrade to their playoff rotation.

    Instead, I look at teams trying to claw their way back into contention, and in desperate need of a veteran who can provide quality innings. My suggested match in the Handbook was the Cincinnati Reds, who have been withering away a Hall of Fame career for Joey Votto with three straight 90-loss seasons.

    There's pressure to get things turned around in a hurry, but the Reds aren't exactly positioned to go get Jake Arrieta. Santana would represent a modest financial commitment, and he'd immediately slot next to young fireballer Luis Castillo atop the rotation. Erv has been credited as a mentor in Minnesota – that factors as well with the 24-year-old Castillo being a fellow Dominican.

    In the blueprint I tossed out right-hander Robert Stephenson as a hypothetical return for Santana. He's a high-upside young pitcher, and former first-round pick, who has struggled with control thus far in the majors (5.10 ERA, 1.60 WHIP in 120 innings). He did, however, put together an excellent late run in the Cincy rotation.

    Given his organization's scarcity of promising arms, Stephenson might be asking too much. But he's just one name. The Reds have a number of prospects capable of enriching the Twins system.

    There's also Raisel Iglesias. Jon Morosi reported Minnesota's interest in the Reds closer a couple of weeks ago, and while it'd take plenty more to pry him loose (Romero? Gonsalves?), Santana's presence might help move the needle.

    It's all speculation, of course, but therein lies the fun. Which other teams do you view as possible partners in a Santana trade? What would you be looking to get in return?

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

     

    Darvish for Ervin addresses the need for front end pitching

    You addressed one need but there are many more. Gibson/Mejia/? in the 3/4/5 spots is a dreadfully awful rotation to enter the season. If the Twins are so crunched for payroll then a different plan needs to be made.

     

    You addressed one need but there are many more. Gibson/Mejia/? in the 3/4/5 spots is a dreadfully awful rotation to enter the season. If the Twins are so crunched for payroll then a different plan needs to be made.

    They aren't bringing in 3 quality pitchers, relief help, a 4th OF bat, ect in one offseason. Money comes off the books after this season and ditto after 19' so the "crunch," isn't long lived. It's a creative way to bring in a front end starter now rather than bank on winning the Kershaw sweepstakes next season or wait until 2020 or beyond. 

     

    They aren't bringing in 3 quality pitchers, relief help, a 4th OF bat, ect in one offseason. Money comes off the books after this season and ditto after 19' so the "crunch," isn't long lived. It's a creative way to bring in a front end starter now rather than bank on winning the Kershaw sweepstakes next season or wait until 2020 or beyond. 

    They don't need to bring in 3 quality starters. They need to add 1 or 2 instead of add one and subtract one. There is absolutely no way the Twins can start the season with 3 pitchers like Gibson/Mejia/? in the rotation. Start the season with 1-2 of those guys is progress though. Any plan that necessitates that action needs to be redone.

     

    And you are partially creating this payroll problem. If the FO/ownership is serious about contending this year or next then they need to increase payroll instead of running this team like Metrodome Twins. And as you say the 'crunch' isn't long lived.

     

    They don't need to bring in 3 quality starters. They need to add 1 or 2 instead of add one and subtract one. There is absolutely no way the Twins can start the season with 3 pitchers like Gibson/Mejia/? in the rotation. Start the season with 1-2 of those guys is progress though. Any plan that necessitates that action needs to be redone.

     

    And you are partially creating this payroll problem. If the FO/ownership is serious about contending this year or next then they need to increase payroll instead of running this team like Metrodome Twins. And as you say the 'crunch' isn't long lived.

    Upgrading the front of the rotation is progress. The Twins need front end help. Maybe you disagree, but I can't see them making noise in the postseason with it. The article presumes the Twins operate under a tight cap as they have the past few seasons. IMO it's easier to build the back of a rotation than the front. If they have the opportunity to bring in a guy like Darvish then I think they have to take it, even if that means trading Ervin. As I said, Mauer and Dozier are off the books after next season, and Hughes follows shortly after. Next offseason is Kershaw of bust in terms of big arms so good luck to the Twins winning that war. If they're waiting until 2020 to find help Buxton, Sano, ect are hitting arbitration and two years w/o front end help have passed. Losing Ervin and not bringing in anybody certainly doesn't help the rest of the rotation, but I would rather go 1 year without high/elite level pitching as opposed to 2+. Who knows, maybe they could make a move to bring on an cheap, unspectacular, but semi reliable starter along with Darvish. All of this of course hinges on the Twins actually being a big player in FA, which I have next to no confidence will occur. 

     

    I don't know why you're so hung up on spending. Again, NOBODY is saying don't increase payroll. NOBODY wants to trade Ervin. The article was a plan B in the event ownership decides not to make drastic changes regarding the payroll. If you'll be upset if the payroll doesn't bump up significantly this offseason I'll be right there with you. 

     

    I don't know why you're so hung up on spending. Again, NOBODY is saying don't increase payroll. NOBODY wants to trade Ervin. 

     

    I dunno man. I have seen the "Trade Santana" argument ever since he first put on a Twins uniform, and I have seen countless people argue against raising payroll for years.

     

    We should:

    - Want to keep the best players we can, if possible, and

    - Not worry about the price.

     

    Fans don't need to be making these types of tough decisions, or concern ourselves with them!

    Sure, we should be realistic on what this team can do, but we often cross over into defending the team.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...