Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Sale of the Minnesota Twins Franchise Reportedly Trending Toward Completion


    Nick Nelson

    The process appears to be moving faster than expected, with a recent report suggesting that new ownership could be in place by the start of the 2025 season, now less than three months away.

    For Twins fans, this seems like great news.

    Image courtesy of Mark J. Rebilas-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    When the revelation surfaced last October that the Pohlad family was actively exploring a sale of the Minnesota Twins franchise they've owned for over 40 years, it came as music to the ears of frustrated fans. But the news also came with a caveat: don't expect things to necessarily move quickly. Historically the high-stakes process of selling a pro sports team has often been slow and methodical, stretching out over multiple years and in many cases failing to come to fruition.

    In the case of the Twins, there were an added number of complications at play, ranging from the attractiveness of the market to the morale of the fanbase to future uncertainty around TV revenue. In spite of these factors, it sounds like momentum is building toward completion of a sale in the near future.

    Dan Hayes of The Athletic reported earlier this week, via industry sources, that the club has a "robust market" and that there's a belief the Twins could be sold by Opening Day. That date falls on March 27th — exactly 11 weeks from now. It's still a decent length of time but it's quicker than most anticipated and suggests that there is little doubt a deal will be reached resulting in a Pohlad family exit.

    "MLB has already begun to vet potential owners," writes Hayes, "and will take a deeper look at stronger candidates as the transaction nears a close."

    In December, reports emerged that Suns minority owner Justin Ishbia was among those interested in buying the Twins, with his fellow billionaire brother Mat likely factoring into an ownership group. Presumably Ishbia is among the finalists whose legitimate interest and capability is helping fuel confidence in a somewhat imminent conclusion to this saga. Based on the limited information we have, he would have to be considered the favorite. 

    "The industry source briefed on their plans said the Ishbia brothers are very interested in purchasing the Twins and have held several meetings with local leaders," Hayes shared in his latest. When the Ishbia rumors began to gain steam, our Tom Froemming shared his thoughts about what such an ownership transition might mean for the franchise and its fans:

    For Twins fans, it's hard to feel anything but immense optimism about this developing story. The franchise has fallen into a major rut since the high point we all experienced in 2023; there has not been one single particularly significant addition or exciting move made since the postseason exit as the front office has been directed the shed payroll and lay low. 

    The dampened fan morale has been reflected in just about every indicator across the board. Attendance was down last year, viewership was down, and in 2024 Twins Daily experienced a year-over-year drop in traffic for the first time in its history. People are checked out, and they need a reason to check back in. A change in ownership could provide exactly that. Given the seemingly active and aggressive buyer market, it's hard to believe a new regime would not come in looking to shake things up with a positive statement and increased payroll investment.

    Hayes reports that his source "believes it will be a complete sale of the Twins with an immediate takeover in control," unlike the prolonged three-stage process that was planned for the neighboring Timberwolves (which is now in doubt). 

    While it's probably too late to hope for a major change in the spending outlook for the 2025 season, and the kind of late-breaking impact additions that could entail this offseason, a sale being completed by the end of March would set the stage for a near-term shift in spending philosophy, perhaps with flexibility to add salary during the season (which they clearly lacked last year), and certainly beyond.

    What are your reactions to this report and the potential for a changing of the guard before the regular season gets underway? Let's hear your thoughts in the comments.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    53 minutes ago, Doctor Gast said:

    ML Ready, anyone that has a slight interest in stocks, dreams of getting into Apple when they started up. I have & also futilely mapped out how much $ I'd have made. I'm not a billionaire, but I assume most billionaires don't amass their billions by not buying stocks (unless they create an investment firm) but buying businesses. You have some control over your business, you don't with stocks. I'm not a contentious person & I don't fault anyone over their opinions. But I do find fault with Bean5302's snidely off-remark while quoting me. Otherwise, I'd have ignored his remark.

    Any money the Pohlads sunk into the team after they bought it is an operational cost, which is considered part of the decision to make a profit and rightsizing. Which is not under debate. 

    It seemed that Bean5302 was trying to illustrate the relative increase in market cap for the Twins vs other potential investments.  I assume he did this because there have been countless posts suggesting this increase in valuation was phenomenal.  What Bean5302 showed was that this was not remotely close to the return on something like Apple. 

    Anyone that has done any investing can pull up an online investment calculator, plug in the number and determine a future asset value or a rate of return.  For all the ranting here, it would appear that the people doing the ranting have never bothered to check the validity of their theories.  Bean5302 made it really simple but anyone who does not like the facts, ignores them. The takeaway here should be that the increase in valuation has been slightly less than what any of us would have made in a S&P 500 fund which I would bet are part of some of the member's 401K.  




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...