No, but we talk about how they won too many games. Hunter had a great year, but would trading him at the deadline have lost them a couple games? Smith? Guy is a shell of himself and will probably retire this offseason. Other than that, what value was there on the roster that would have significantly affected their final record?
They had to get Dobbs because they physically didn’t have 2 healthy QBs on the roster after Kirk got hurt. They probably would have lost to Atlanta on their own had Hall not been injured in-game. What was Dobbs expected to do? He didn’t even know the plays and was improvising. Then he was playing for a roster/starting spot against the saints and balled out. It is what it is.
I just don’t see any moves that could have been made that would have erased enough wins to have a significant impact. Dobbs had a mini-run playing for a roster spot and the only other game they won could have easily been a loss if the raiders didn’t out-inept them.
I remember when there was talk about trading Kirk when the team was 0-3 and 1-4 (a lot by me). Now I love Kirk and want him back next year, but THAT was a move that could have brought some return and also set the team up to lose on its own (not saying he would have approved). But then in classic Vikings fashion, they went out and went on a run before the blown out Achilles.
Sometimes there just arent any moves that can be made to “throw” a season. And if any team failed at that, it wasn’t the Vikings. Look at the Jets. They need a QB and went 3-2 down the stretch. So do the Giants who went 4-3. Vikings went 1-5. And at one point, the bears were going to have 2 top 5 picks. People on rosters and in front offices have a hard time just giving up.