-
Posts
6,585 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis
Minnesota Twins Videos
2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings
2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses
Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors
Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources
2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses
The Minnesota Twins Players Project
2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses
2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses
2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses
Forums
Blogs
Events
Store
Downloads
Gallery
Everything posted by Shane Wahl
-
Minnesota Twins Prospect Handbook Trivia
Shane Wahl replied to Seth Stohs's topic in Twins Minor League Talk
Oswaldo Arcia -
Are people putting Juan Pierre on the same level as Jason Tyner? That is foolish.
-
Prospect movement trends, 2011-2012
Shane Wahl commented on Shane Wahl's blog entry in Field of Twins
Thanks. You can tell by the end that the fatigue had set in. Blogging is somehow tiring. -
Brilliant. Not much more can be said.
-
Why Is Everyone So Worried About Willingham In Right Field?
Shane Wahl replied to John Bonnes's topic in Minnesota Twins Talk
I wish I wouldn't have read the whole thing, now. Fanatic Jack are you the composite of every Star Tribune commenter in the history of Twins baseball? I am serious. Are you a computer program that took all of those comments and is now outputting those at random? -
Why Is Everyone So Worried About Willingham In Right Field?
Shane Wahl replied to John Bonnes's topic in Minnesota Twins Talk
Haven't read anything since John's OP yet, but I agree with him. It is bizarro that people worry about this. LF at TF is significantly more difficult than RF and . . . these are major leaguers. Positional movement should not be a big deal, especially in this case. -
Minnesota Twins Prospect Handbook Trivia
Shane Wahl replied to Seth Stohs's topic in Twins Minor League Talk
I will look through it and find it, damn it. I am surprised that no one else bothered. -
Bates has also played LF for significant time. The Twins shifting to 11 pitchers in May would help resolve this, although I expect Pearce to be behind Carson and Burroughs.
-
It's weird about Rosario. Clearly moving him to second is ideal in the long term, but at Beloit isn't there a MI logjam while there is an OF shortage? I guess I would expect Rosario to move back and forth between 2B and CF as long as it doesn't mess with him too much.
- 26 replies
-
- beloit snappers
- eddie rosario
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
I like Jared Burton. But I would really like it to be Carlos Gutierrez.
- 16 replies
-
- bullpen
- glen perkins
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Twins fans who have a curiosity about how things are "down on the farm" may look at top 10 prospect lists or maybe merely look at those players who are September call-ups and judge the state of the Twins system accordingly. Seth Stohs does more than enough to provide fans with a wealth of information about minor leaguers, but I thought that I would take things a step further and look at the movement of players, by position, on some select prospect lists for 2011-2012. This does a number of things. First, one can get a picture of the depth of the system as a whole. Second, one can see how the 2011 draft was either satisfactory or not in addressing team needs. Third, we can project potential targeted positions for the 2012 draft. Finally, one can see how players have risen and fallen over the past year to see how the health of the system breaks down by position. Contrary to much popular belief, especially what passes for "belief" on the Star Tribune comment section, the Twins have a good minor league system, with many good-to-great prospects. Methodology: I constructed a composite list of top 50 prospects from Twinkie Town, Seth Speaks, and my own list for 2011 and 2012. I compared lists by position and by placement on the lists (top 5, top 15, top 25, top 35, top 50). There are some interesting conclusions to draw and some clear directions the Twins should take in the upcoming draft and in minor league free agent signings. Composite lists are found here: http://fieldoftwins.blogspot.com/201...2011-2012.html Prospect movement, by position, the number of players at each positions at various levels (Revere is excluded): OF 2011: Top 5: 2 (Hicks, Benson) Top 15: 7 (Morales, Arcia, Kepler, Parmelee, Rosario) Top 25: 10 (Tosoni, Ortiz, Goodrum) Top 35: 11 (N. Roberts) Top 50: 14 (Herrmann, Bigley, Ray) OF 2012: Top 5: 4 (Rosario, Arcia, Hicks, Benson) Top 15: 7 (Parmelee, Kepler, Morales) Top 25: 8 (Goodrum) Top 35: 11 (Williams, Roberts, Perez) Top 50: 15 (Ray, Rams, Ortiz, Bigley) Outfield analysis: There has been movement upward, and this is on top of Ben Revere and Rene Tosoni being out of 2012 consideration due to MLB playing time). While Rosario may move to 2B, some players down the list farther may be moving to the OF (Goodrum, Perez, Rams). The depth has remained roughly the same while there is a movement from the top-middle to the top. ROCH: Benson, Parmelee, Bigley eventually. NBR: Hicks, Morales, Bigley, Rams and Perez eventually). FTM: Arcia, Roberts, Perez, Ray, Rams, and Ortiz eventually), BEL: Rosario, Kepler, Goodrum, Williams, Ortiz. C 2011: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 0 Top 25: 0 Top 35: 1 (Rams) Top 50: 2 (Herrmann) C 2012: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 1 (Herrmann) Top 25: 1 Top 35: 1 Top 50: 2 (Rams) Catcher analysis: Herrmann and Rams are going in opposite directions, and Rams may be moving to the outfield anyway). Herrmann hopefully will be an adequate defensive catcher while providing depth at other positions to keep is on base bat in the lineup. Danny Lehmann, Danny Rohlfing, and Josmil Pinto will be guys to watch at the mid-upper levels this year to try to provide depth at this position. At the lower levels, Matthew Koch and Phillip Chapman need to develop. This is a big area for the Twins to look at in the 2012 draft. ROCH: Butera/Towles, Rivera, Lehmann and Herrmann eventually). NBR: Lehmann, Herrmann, Rams eventually, Rohlfing eventually. FTM: Rams, Rohlfing, Pinto, Chapman eventually. BEL: Chapman, Koch. 1B 2011: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 1 (Parmelee) Top 25: 1 Top 35: 2 (Hughes) Top 50: 4 (Ray, Vargas) 1B 2012: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 2 (Parmelee, Harrison) Top 25: 2 Top 35: 2 Top 50: 3 (Ray, lost Hughes and Vargas) 1B analysis: Chris Parmelee has moved up the list and if Travis Harrison moves from 3B to 1B, the Twins may have bolstered the depth at this position. Ray and Michael Gonzales are worthy of watching at Fort Myers this year. ROCH: Parmelee, Pearce, Bates. NBR: Hanson, Colabello. FTM: Gonzalez, Ray. BEL: Rory Rhodes, Vargas, Harrison eventually). 2B 2011: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 0 Top 25: 1 (Goodrum) Top 35: 4 (Beresford, Hughes, Dozier) Top 50: 5 (Santana) 2B 2012: Top 5: 1 (Rosario) Top 15: 2 (Dozier) Top 25: 4 (Goodrum and Michael) Top 35: 4 Top 50: 6 (Santana and Beresford) 2B analysis: With the potential switch from the OF for Rosario, it would change the entire power structure of the Twins system. That kind of talent in the middle infield is enormous. Let's say, however, that the switch is a bit shaky this year, the addition of Dozier and Michael to the upper half is great). The depth is climbing to the top at 2B. 3B 2011: Top 5: 1 (Sano) Top 15: 1 Top 25: 2 (Goodrum) Top 35: 3 (Hughes) Top 50: 4 (Hidalgo) 3B 2012: Top 5: 1 (Sano) Top 15: 2 (Harrison) Top 25: 2 Top 35: 3 (Perez, if he stays at 3B, Hughes no longer prospect) Top 50: 4 (Hidalgo) 3B analysis: Very little movement and that is a problem. It may be that neither Sano nor Harrison can really stick at 3B (and the same for Perez and Hidalgo!). Joe Mauer start fielding grounders at the hot corner . . . and the Twins need to focus on this position in the system. ROCH: Chang, Burroughs. NBR: Deibinson Romero, Hidalgo. FTM: Perez . . . Grimes, perhaps BEL: Harrison eventually, fill-ins . . . SS 2011: Top 5: 1 (Sano) Top 15: 1 Top 25: 3 (Goodrum, Plouffe) Top 35: 5 (Beresford, Dozier) Top 50: 7 (Polanco, Santana) SS 2012: Top 5: 0 (Sano moves to 3B) Top 15: 1 (Dozier) Top 25: 3 (Goodrum, Michael, Plouffe no longer prospect) Top 35: 3 (Beresford dropped) Top 50: 5 (Santana, Beresford, Polanco dropped off) Shortstop analysis: Sano is likely done at short, but Dozier's rise helps this position immensely, as does the drafting of Michael. If they both can stay at SS, this is a great development at a problematic position. Daniel Santana will be someone very important to watch this year, and one hopes that Beresford and Polanco can turn it around. I would think that all goes well at this position this year. ROCH: Nishioka (ideally), Florimon, Chang, Dozier eventually. NBR: Dozier, Beresford. FTM: Santana, Grimes, Michael eventually. BEL: Michael, Bryant, Goodrum, eventually. RHS 2011: Top 5: 2 (Gibson, Wimmers) Top 15: 6 (Hendriks, Bromberg, Salcedo, Soliman) Top 25: 9 (Hermsen, Holbrooks, Guerra) Top 35: 11 (Stuifbergen, Lanigan) Top 50: 12 (Munoz) RHS 2012: Top 5: 0 (Gibson, Wimmers drop) Top 15: 4 (Hendriks, Gibson, Salcedo, Wimmers, Soliman likely converts to RHR in 2012) Top 25: 10 (Boyd, Boer, Hermsen, Stuifbergen, Bromberg, Hauser, Guerra converted to RHR) Top 35: 11 (Doyle) Top 50: 14 (Mata, Shibuya, Lanigan) Right-handed starter analysis: Liam Hendriks emerged as a true middle of the rotation caliber pitcher and he has the brain for pitching as well. 2011 was a mess in that Gibson and Bromberg were injured, Wimmers lost his control, and Guerra had to convert to a relief role. Soliman is likely to join him as well. So there is movement down towards the middle of the prospect list at this position, but at the same time the 2011 draft provided a lot of depth at the position with Boyd, Boer, Mata, and Shibuya). Wimmers is the key here, and Bromberg is right behind, but keep an eye on Stuifbergen, Hauser, and Boer as well). ROCH: Hendriks, Manship, Suarez, Bromberg eventually, Wimmers eventually, Stuifbergen eventually. NBR: Bromberg, Stuifbergen, Wimmers, Popham, Lanigan. FTM: Hermsen, Salcedo, Achter, Shibuya eventually, Boer eventually. BEL: Shibuya, Boer, Atherton, Christensen. RHR 2011: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 1 (Gutierrez) Top 25: 3 (Slama, Waldrop) Top 35: 5 (Watts, Pugh) Top 50: 8 (Oliveros, Jacobson, Tonkin) RHR 2012: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 0 Top 25: 2 (Soliman conversion, Gutierrez) Top 35: 4 (Guerra, Summers) Top 50: 6 (Watts, DeVries) Right-handed reliever analysis: The position is bolstered by the conversion from starter of Soliman and Guerra, otherwise this is a deeply problematic position. Lester Oliveros will be an integral part of this depth chart. While it is one thing to simply convert starters into relievers, gearing relievers to be relievers seems to be more likley to produce good relief pitching. There is a movement toward the middle and toward the bottom here. This will be a vital need for the Twins in the 2012 draft. That means hard-throwers. ROCH: Gutierrez, Slama, Guerra, Oliveros, DeVries, Burton, Bulger, Vasquez, etc. A whole bunch of guys. LHS 2011: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 0 Top 25: 2 (Dean, Diamond) Top 35: 2 Top 50: 4 (Darnell, Osterbrock) LHS 2012: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 0 Top 25: 0 Top 35: 3 (Darnell, Dean, Diamond) Top 50: 3 LHS analysis: Logan Darnell's rise is promising. Pat Dean and Scott Diamond need bounce-back seasons. This is another key area for the 2012 draft. ROCH: Diamond, A. Thompson. NBR: Darnell, Osterbrock. FTM: Dean, O'Rourke. BEL: Tomshaw. LHR 2011: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 0 Top 25: 0 Top 35: 0 Top 50: 3 (Ibarra, Bashore, Davis) LHR 2012: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 0 Top 25: 0 Top 35: 1 (C. Williams) Top 50: (Tyler Robertson, Matt Bashore, Ibarra and Davis drop) Left-handed reliever analysis: This is a weak area for the Twins, to say the least. Robertson and Williams are vital to the depth here. Bashore and Davis are coming back from injury. Ibarra is not someone that I personally believe to be a legitimate prospect. ROCH: Robertson, Maloney, Dumatrait, Albers eventually. NBR: Albers, Davis, Nelson, Steedley. FTM: Carter, Gonzales, Ibarra. BEL: Williams, Gruver, Hurlbut, Wheeler. This was meant to provide an overview of the direction of the farm system. It is an undervalued system, but there are some gaping holes. The Twins need to draft intelligently like they did last year. I do not propose that the MLB draft be positional, since there is and would be great value in simply taking the best guy available, but there are some areas of need to focus on. They are: LHP in general, RHR, C, and 3B. Of the first 25 picks, I would base my expectations around 6 LHP, 5 RHR, 4 3B, 3C, 2 1B, 2 OF, 2 MI draft. The future direction of the team is up to the reader. This post was meant to point out some expectations and limitations on players. The future is not bleak, and neither may be the future. Lefty pitching, hard-throwing rights, catcher, and 3B are vital right now.
-
Prospect movement trends, 2011-2012
Shane Wahl commented on Shane Wahl's blog entry in Field of Twins
Twins fans who have a curiosity about how things are "down on the farm" may look at top 10 prospect lists or maybe merely look at those players who are September call-ups and judge the state of the Twins system accordingly. Seth Stohs does more than enough to provide fans with a wealth of information about minor leaguers, but I thought that I would take things a step further and look at the movement of players, by position, on some select prospect lists for 2011-2012. This does a number of things. First, one can get a picture of the depth of the system as a whole. Second, one can see how the 2011 draft was either satisfactory or not in addressing team needs. Third, we can project potential targeted positions for the 2012 draft. Finally, one can see how players have risen and fallen over the past year to see how the health of the system breaks down by position. Contrary to much popular belief, especially what passes for "belief" on the Star Tribune comment section, the Twins have a good minor league system, with many good-to-great prospects. Methodology: I constructed a composite list of top 50 prospects from Twinkie Town, Seth Speaks, and my own list for 2011 and 2012. I compared lists by position and by placement on the lists (top 5, top 15, top 25, top 35, top 50). There are some interesting conclusions to draw and some clear directions the Twins should take in the upcoming draft and in minor league free agent signings. Composite lists are found here: http://fieldoftwins.blogspot.com/201...2011-2012.html Prospect movement, by position, the number of players at each positions at various levels (Revere is excluded): OF 2011: Top 5: 2 (Hicks, Benson) Top 15: 7 (Morales, Arcia, Kepler, Parmelee, Rosario) Top 25: 10 (Tosoni, Ortiz, Goodrum) Top 35: 11 (N. Roberts) Top 50: 14 (Herrmann, Bigley, Ray) OF 2012: Top 5: 4 (Rosario, Arcia, Hicks, Benson) Top 15: 7 (Parmelee, Kepler, Morales) Top 25: 8 (Goodrum) Top 35: 11 (Williams, Roberts, Perez) Top 50: 15 (Ray, Rams, Ortiz, Bigley) Outfield analysis: There has been movement upward, and this is on top of Ben Revere and Rene Tosoni being out of 2012 consideration due to MLB playing time). While Rosario may move to 2B, some players down the list farther may be moving to the OF (Goodrum, Perez, Rams). The depth has remained roughly the same while there is a movement from the top-middle to the top. ROCH: Benson, Parmelee, Bigley eventually. NBR: Hicks, Morales, Bigley, Rams and Perez eventually). FTM: Arcia, Roberts, Perez, Ray, Rams, and Ortiz eventually), BEL: Rosario, Kepler, Goodrum, Williams, Ortiz. C 2011: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 0 Top 25: 0 Top 35: 1 (Rams) Top 50: 2 (Herrmann) C 2012: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 1 (Herrmann) Top 25: 1 Top 35: 1 Top 50: 2 (Rams) Catcher analysis: Herrmann and Rams are going in opposite directions, and Rams may be moving to the outfield anyway). Herrmann hopefully will be an adequate defensive catcher while providing depth at other positions to keep is on base bat in the lineup. Danny Lehmann, Danny Rohlfing, and Josmil Pinto will be guys to watch at the mid-upper levels this year to try to provide depth at this position. At the lower levels, Matthew Koch and Phillip Chapman need to develop. This is a big area for the Twins to look at in the 2012 draft. ROCH: Butera/Towles, Rivera, Lehmann and Herrmann eventually). NBR: Lehmann, Herrmann, Rams eventually, Rohlfing eventually. FTM: Rams, Rohlfing, Pinto, Chapman eventually. BEL: Chapman, Koch. 1B 2011: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 1 (Parmelee) Top 25: 1 Top 35: 2 (Hughes) Top 50: 4 (Ray, Vargas) 1B 2012: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 2 (Parmelee, Harrison) Top 25: 2 Top 35: 2 Top 50: 3 (Ray, lost Hughes and Vargas) 1B analysis: Chris Parmelee has moved up the list and if Travis Harrison moves from 3B to 1B, the Twins may have bolstered the depth at this position. Ray and Michael Gonzales are worthy of watching at Fort Myers this year. ROCH: Parmelee, Pearce, Bates. NBR: Hanson, Colabello. FTM: Gonzalez, Ray. BEL: Rory Rhodes, Vargas, Harrison eventually). 2B 2011: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 0 Top 25: 1 (Goodrum) Top 35: 4 (Beresford, Hughes, Dozier) Top 50: 5 (Santana) 2B 2012: Top 5: 1 (Rosario) Top 15: 2 (Dozier) Top 25: 4 (Goodrum and Michael) Top 35: 4 Top 50: 6 (Santana and Beresford) 2B analysis: With the potential switch from the OF for Rosario, it would change the entire power structure of the Twins system. That kind of talent in the middle infield is enormous. Let's say, however, that the switch is a bit shaky this year, the addition of Dozier and Michael to the upper half is great). The depth is climbing to the top at 2B. 3B 2011: Top 5: 1 (Sano) Top 15: 1 Top 25: 2 (Goodrum) Top 35: 3 (Hughes) Top 50: 4 (Hidalgo) 3B 2012: Top 5: 1 (Sano) Top 15: 2 (Harrison) Top 25: 2 Top 35: 3 (Perez, if he stays at 3B, Hughes no longer prospect) Top 50: 4 (Hidalgo) 3B analysis: Very little movement and that is a problem. It may be that neither Sano nor Harrison can really stick at 3B (and the same for Perez and Hidalgo!). Joe Mauer start fielding grounders at the hot corner . . . and the Twins need to focus on this position in the system. ROCH: Chang, Burroughs. NBR: Deibinson Romero, Hidalgo. FTM: Perez . . . Grimes, perhaps BEL: Harrison eventually, fill-ins . . . SS 2011: Top 5: 1 (Sano) Top 15: 1 Top 25: 3 (Goodrum, Plouffe) Top 35: 5 (Beresford, Dozier) Top 50: 7 (Polanco, Santana) SS 2012: Top 5: 0 (Sano moves to 3B) Top 15: 1 (Dozier) Top 25: 3 (Goodrum, Michael, Plouffe no longer prospect) Top 35: 3 (Beresford dropped) Top 50: 5 (Santana, Beresford, Polanco dropped off) Shortstop analysis: Sano is likely done at short, but Dozier's rise helps this position immensely, as does the drafting of Michael. If they both can stay at SS, this is a great development at a problematic position. Daniel Santana will be someone very important to watch this year, and one hopes that Beresford and Polanco can turn it around. I would think that all goes well at this position this year. ROCH: Nishioka (ideally), Florimon, Chang, Dozier eventually. NBR: Dozier, Beresford. FTM: Santana, Grimes, Michael eventually. BEL: Michael, Bryant, Goodrum, eventually. RHS 2011: Top 5: 2 (Gibson, Wimmers) Top 15: 6 (Hendriks, Bromberg, Salcedo, Soliman) Top 25: 9 (Hermsen, Holbrooks, Guerra) Top 35: 11 (Stuifbergen, Lanigan) Top 50: 12 (Munoz) RHS 2012: Top 5: 0 (Gibson, Wimmers drop) Top 15: 4 (Hendriks, Gibson, Salcedo, Wimmers, Soliman likely converts to RHR in 2012) Top 25: 10 (Boyd, Boer, Hermsen, Stuifbergen, Bromberg, Hauser, Guerra converted to RHR) Top 35: 11 (Doyle) Top 50: 14 (Mata, Shibuya, Lanigan) Right-handed starter analysis: Liam Hendriks emerged as a true middle of the rotation caliber pitcher and he has the brain for pitching as well. 2011 was a mess in that Gibson and Bromberg were injured, Wimmers lost his control, and Guerra had to convert to a relief role. Soliman is likely to join him as well. So there is movement down towards the middle of the prospect list at this position, but at the same time the 2011 draft provided a lot of depth at the position with Boyd, Boer, Mata, and Shibuya). Wimmers is the key here, and Bromberg is right behind, but keep an eye on Stuifbergen, Hauser, and Boer as well). ROCH: Hendriks, Manship, Suarez, Bromberg eventually, Wimmers eventually, Stuifbergen eventually. NBR: Bromberg, Stuifbergen, Wimmers, Popham, Lanigan. FTM: Hermsen, Salcedo, Achter, Shibuya eventually, Boer eventually. BEL: Shibuya, Boer, Atherton, Christensen. RHR 2011: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 1 (Gutierrez) Top 25: 3 (Slama, Waldrop) Top 35: 5 (Watts, Pugh) Top 50: 8 (Oliveros, Jacobson, Tonkin) RHR 2012: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 0 Top 25: 2 (Soliman conversion, Gutierrez) Top 35: 4 (Guerra, Summers) Top 50: 6 (Watts, DeVries) Right-handed reliever analysis: The position is bolstered by the conversion from starter of Soliman and Guerra, otherwise this is a deeply problematic position. Lester Oliveros will be an integral part of this depth chart. While it is one thing to simply convert starters into relievers, gearing relievers to be relievers seems to be more likley to produce good relief pitching. There is a movement toward the middle and toward the bottom here. This will be a vital need for the Twins in the 2012 draft. That means hard-throwers. ROCH: Gutierrez, Slama, Guerra, Oliveros, DeVries, Burton, Bulger, Vasquez, etc. A whole bunch of guys. LHS 2011: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 0 Top 25: 2 (Dean, Diamond) Top 35: 2 Top 50: 4 (Darnell, Osterbrock) LHS 2012: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 0 Top 25: 0 Top 35: 3 (Darnell, Dean, Diamond) Top 50: 3 LHS analysis: Logan Darnell's rise is promising. Pat Dean and Scott Diamond need bounce-back seasons. This is another key area for the 2012 draft. ROCH: Diamond, A. Thompson. NBR: Darnell, Osterbrock. FTM: Dean, O'Rourke. BEL: Tomshaw. LHR 2011: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 0 Top 25: 0 Top 35: 0 Top 50: 3 (Ibarra, Bashore, Davis) LHR 2012: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 0 Top 25: 0 Top 35: 1 (C. Williams) Top 50: (Tyler Robertson, Matt Bashore, Ibarra and Davis drop) Left-handed reliever analysis: This is a weak area for the Twins, to say the least. Robertson and Williams are vital to the depth here. Bashore and Davis are coming back from injury. Ibarra is not someone that I personally believe to be a legitimate prospect. ROCH: Robertson, Maloney, Dumatrait, Albers eventually. NBR: Albers, Davis, Nelson, Steedley. FTM: Carter, Gonzales, Ibarra. BEL: Williams, Gruver, Hurlbut, Wheeler. This was meant to provide an overview of the direction of the farm system. It is an undervalued system, but there are some gaping holes. The Twins need to draft intelligently like they did last year. I do not propose that the MLB draft be positional, since there is and would be great value in simply taking the best guy available, but there are some areas of need to focus on. They are: LHP in general, RHR, C, and 3B. Of the first 25 picks, I would base my expectations around 6 LHP, 5 RHR, 4 3B, 3C, 2 1B, 2 OF, 2 MI draft. The future direction of the team is up to the reader. This post was meant to point out some expectations and limitations on players. The future is not bleak, and neither may be the future. Lefty pitching, hard-throwing rights, catcher, and 3B are vital right now. -
I would be very happy with a young Juan Pierresque player batting 9th in the lineup. What the hell? That said, I would like to see him as trade bait AS LONG AS Benson and Hicks have a good April-August this year.
-
Twins fans who have a curiosity about how things are "down on the farm" may look at top 10 prospect lists or maybe merely look at those players who are September call-ups and judge the state of the Twins system accordingly. Seth Stohs does more than enough to provide fans with a wealth of information about minor leaguers, but I thought that I would take things a step further and look at the movement of players, by position, on some select prospect lists for 2011-2012. This does a number of things. First, one can get a picture of the depth of the system as a whole. Second, one can see how the 2011 draft was either satisfactory or not in addressing team needs. Third, we can project potential targeted positions for the 2012 draft. Finally, one can see how players have risen and fallen over the past year to see how the health of the system breaks down by position. Contrary to much popular belief, especially what passes for "belief" on the Star Tribune comment section, the Twins have a good minor league system, with many good-to-great prospects. Methodology: I constructed a composite list of top 50 prospects from Twinkie Town, Seth Speaks, and my own list for 2011 and 2012. I compared lists by position and by placement on the lists (top 5, top 15, top 25, top 35, top 50). There are some interesting conclusions to draw and some clear directions the Twins should take in the upcoming draft and in minor league free agent signings. Composite lists are found here: http://fieldoftwins.blogspot.com/2012/03/composite-prospect-lists-2011-2012.html Prospect movement, by position, the number of players at each positions at various levels (Revere is excluded): OF 2011: Top 5: 2 (Hicks, Benson) Top 15: 7 (Morales, Arcia, Kepler, Parmelee, Rosario) Top 25: 10 (Tosoni, Ortiz, Goodrum) Top 35: 11 (N. Roberts) Top 50: 14 (Herrmann, Bigley, Ray) OF 2012: Top 5: 4 (Rosario, Arcia, Hicks, Benson) Top 15: 7 (Parmelee, Kepler, Morales) Top 25: 8 (Goodrum) Top 35: 11 (Williams, Roberts, Perez) Top 50: 15 (Ray, Rams, Ortiz, Bigley) Outfield analysis: There has been movement upward, and this is on top of Ben Revere and Rene Tosoni being out of 2012 consideration due to MLB playing time). While Rosario may move to 2B, some players down the list farther may be moving to the OF (Goodrum, Perez, Rams). The depth has remained roughly the same while there is a movement from the top-middle to the top. ROCH: Benson, Parmelee, Bigley eventually. NBR: Hicks, Morales, Bigley, Rams and Perez eventually). FTM: Arcia, Roberts, Perez, Ray, Rams, and Ortiz eventually), BEL: Rosario, Kepler, Goodrum, Williams, Ortiz. C 2011: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 0 Top 25: 0 Top 35: 1 (Rams) Top 50: 2 (Herrmann) C 2012: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 1 (Herrmann) Top 25: 1 Top 35: 1 Top 50: 2 (Rams) Catcher analysis: Herrmann and Rams are going in opposite directions, and Rams may be moving to the outfield anyway). Herrmann hopefully will be an adequate defensive catcher while providing depth at other positions to keep is on base bat in the lineup. Danny Lehmann, Danny Rohlfing, and Josmil Pinto will be guys to watch at the mid-upper levels this year to try to provide depth at this position. At the lower levels, Matthew Koch and Phillip Chapman need to develop. This is a big area for the Twins to look at in the 2012 draft. ROCH: Butera/Towles, Rivera, Lehmann and Herrmann eventually). NBR: Lehmann, Herrmann, Rams eventually, Rohlfing eventually. FTM: Rams, Rohlfing, Pinto, Chapman eventually. BEL: Chapman, Koch. 1B 2011: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 1 (Parmelee) Top 25: 1 Top 35: 2 (Hughes) Top 50: 4 (Ray, Vargas) 1B 2012: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 2 (Parmelee, Harrison) Top 25: 2 Top 35: 2 Top 50: 3 (Ray, lost Hughes and Vargas) 1B analysis: Chris Parmelee has moved up the list and if Travis Harrison moves from 3B to 1B, the Twins may have bolstered the depth at this position. Ray and Michael Gonzales are worthy of watching at Fort Myers this year. ROCH: Parmelee, Pearce, Bates. NBR: Hanson, Colabello. FTM: Gonzalez, Ray. BEL: Rory Rhodes, Vargas, Harrison eventually). 2B 2011: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 0 Top 25: 1 (Goodrum) Top 35: 4 (Beresford, Hughes, Dozier) Top 50: 5 (Santana) 2B 2012: Top 5: 1 (Rosario) Top 15: 2 (Dozier) Top 25: 4 (Goodrum and Michael) Top 35: 4 Top 50: 6 (Santana and Beresford) 2B analysis: With the potential switch from the OF for Rosario, it would change the entire power structure of the Twins system. That kind of talent in the middle infield is enormous. Let's say, however, that the switch is a bit shaky this year, the addition of Dozier and Michael to the upper half is great). The depth is climbing to the top at 2B. 3B 2011: Top 5: 1 (Sano) Top 15: 1 Top 25: 2 (Goodrum) Top 35: 3 (Hughes) Top 50: 4 (Hidalgo) 3B 2012: Top 5: 1 (Sano) Top 15: 2 (Harrison) Top 25: 2 Top 35: 3 (Perez, if he stays at 3B, Hughes no longer prospect) Top 50: 4 (Hidalgo) 3B analysis: Very little movement and that is a problem. It may be that neither Sano nor Harrison can really stick at 3B (and the same for Perez and Hidalgo!). Joe Mauer start fielding grounders at the hot corner . . . and the Twins need to focus on this position in the system. ROCH: Chang, Burroughs. NBR: Deibinson Romero, Hidalgo. FTM: Perez . . . Grimes, perhaps BEL: Harrison eventually, fill-ins . . . SS 2011: Top 5: 1 (Sano) Top 15: 1 Top 25: 3 (Goodrum, Plouffe) Top 35: 5 (Beresford, Dozier) Top 50: 7 (Polanco, Santana) SS 2012: Top 5: 0 (Sano moves to 3B) Top 15: 1 (Dozier) Top 25: 3 (Goodrum, Michael, Plouffe no longer prospect) Top 35: 3 (Beresford dropped) Top 50: 5 (Santana, Beresford, Polanco dropped off) Shortstop analysis: Sano is likely done at short, but Dozier's rise helps this position immensely, as does the drafting of Michael. If they both can stay at SS, this is a great development at a problematic position. Daniel Santana will be someone very important to watch this year, and one hopes that Beresford and Polanco can turn it around. I would think that all goes well at this position this year. ROCH: Nishioka (ideally), Florimon, Chang, Dozier eventually. NBR: Dozier, Beresford. FTM: Santana, Grimes, Michael eventually. BEL: Michael, Bryant, Goodrum, eventually. RHS 2011: Top 5: 2 (Gibson, Wimmers) Top 15: 6 (Hendriks, Bromberg, Salcedo, Soliman) Top 25: 9 (Hermsen, Holbrooks, Guerra) Top 35: 11 (Stuifbergen, Lanigan) Top 50: 12 (Munoz) RHS 2012: Top 5: 0 (Gibson, Wimmers drop) Top 15: 4 (Hendriks, Gibson, Salcedo, Wimmers, Soliman likely converts to RHR in 2012) Top 25: 10 (Boyd, Boer, Hermsen, Stuifbergen, Bromberg, Hauser, Guerra converted to RHR) Top 35: 11 (Doyle) Top 50: 14 (Mata, Shibuya, Lanigan) Right-handed starter analysis: Liam Hendriks emerged as a true middle of the rotation caliber pitcher and he has the brain for pitching as well. 2011 was a mess in that Gibson and Bromberg were injured, Wimmers lost his control, and Guerra had to convert to a relief role. Soliman is likely to join him as well. So there is movement down towards the middle of the prospect list at this position, but at the same time the 2011 draft provided a lot of depth at the position with Boyd, Boer, Mata, and Shibuya). Wimmers is the key here, and Bromberg is right behind, but keep an eye on Stuifbergen, Hauser, and Boer as well). ROCH: Hendriks, Manship, Suarez, Bromberg eventually, Wimmers eventually, Stuifbergen eventually. NBR: Bromberg, Stuifbergen, Wimmers, Popham, Lanigan. FTM: Hermsen, Salcedo, Achter, Shibuya eventually, Boer eventually. BEL: Shibuya, Boer, Atherton, Christensen. RHR 2011: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 1 (Gutierrez) Top 25: 3 (Slama, Waldrop) Top 35: 5 (Watts, Pugh) Top 50: 8 (Oliveros, Jacobson, Tonkin) RHR 2012: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 0 Top 25: 2 (Soliman conversion, Gutierrez) Top 35: 4 (Guerra, Summers) Top 50: 6 (Watts, DeVries) Right-handed reliever analysis: The position is bolstered by the conversion from starter of Soliman and Guerra, otherwise this is a deeply problematic position. Lester Oliveros will be an integral part of this depth chart. While it is one thing to simply convert starters into relievers, gearing relievers to be relievers seems to be more likley to produce good relief pitching. There is a movement toward the middle and toward the bottom here. This will be a vital need for the Twins in the 2012 draft. That means hard-throwers. ROCH: Gutierrez, Slama, Guerra, Oliveros, DeVries, Burton, Bulger, Vasquez, etc. A whole bunch of guys. LHS 2011: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 0 Top 25: 2 (Dean, Diamond) Top 35: 2 Top 50: 4 (Darnell, Osterbrock) LHS 2012: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 0 Top 25: 0 Top 35: 3 (Darnell, Dean, Diamond) Top 50: 3 LHS analysis: Logan Darnell's rise is promising. Pat Dean and Scott Diamond need bounce-back seasons. This is another key area for the 2012 draft. ROCH: Diamond, A. Thompson. NBR: Darnell, Osterbrock. FTM: Dean, O'Rourke. BEL: Tomshaw. LHR 2011: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 0 Top 25: 0 Top 35: 0 Top 50: 3 (Ibarra, Bashore, Davis) LHR 2012: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 0 Top 25: 0 Top 35: 1 (C. Williams) Top 50: (Tyler Robertson, Matt Bashore, Ibarra and Davis drop) Left-handed reliever analysis: This is a weak area for the Twins, to say the least. Robertson and Williams are vital to the depth here. Bashore and Davis are coming back from injury. Ibarra is not someone that I personally believe to be a legitimate prospect. ROCH: Robertson, Maloney, Dumatrait, Albers eventually. NBR: Albers, Davis, Nelson, Steedley. FTM: Carter, Gonzales, Ibarra. BEL: Williams, Gruver, Hurlbut, Wheeler. This was meant to provide an overview of the direction of the farm system. It is an undervalued system, but there are some gaping holes. The Twins need to draft intelligently like they did last year. I do not propose that the MLB draft be positional, since there is and would be great value in simply taking the best guy available, but there are some areas of need to focus on. They are: LHP in general, RHR, C, and 3B. Of the first 25 picks, I would base my expectations around 6 LHP, 5 RHR, 4 3B, 3C, 2 1B, 2 OF, 2 MI draft. The future direction of the team is up to the reader. This post was meant to point out some expectations and limitations on players. The future is not bleak, and neither may be the future. Lefty pitching, hard-throwing rights, catcher, and 3B are vital right now.
-
Prospect movement trends, 2011-2012
Shane Wahl commented on Shane Wahl's blog entry in Field of Twins
Twins fans who have a curiosity about how things are "down on the farm" may look at top 10 prospect lists or maybe merely look at those players who are September call-ups and judge the state of the Twins system accordingly. Seth Stohs does more than enough to provide fans with a wealth of information about minor leaguers, but I thought that I would take things a step further and look at the movement of players, by position, on some select prospect lists for 2011-2012. This does a number of things. First, one can get a picture of the depth of the system as a whole. Second, one can see how the 2011 draft was either satisfactory or not in addressing team needs. Third, we can project potential targeted positions for the 2012 draft. Finally, one can see how players have risen and fallen over the past year to see how the health of the system breaks down by position. Contrary to much popular belief, especially what passes for "belief" on the Star Tribune comment section, the Twins have a good minor league system, with many good-to-great prospects. Methodology: I constructed a composite list of top 50 prospects from Twinkie Town, Seth Speaks, and my own list for 2011 and 2012. I compared lists by position and by placement on the lists (top 5, top 15, top 25, top 35, top 50). There are some interesting conclusions to draw and some clear directions the Twins should take in the upcoming draft and in minor league free agent signings. Composite lists are found here: http://fieldoftwins.blogspot.com/2012/03/composite-prospect-lists-2011-2012.html Prospect movement, by position, the number of players at each positions at various levels (Revere is excluded): OF 2011: Top 5: 2 (Hicks, Benson) Top 15: 7 (Morales, Arcia, Kepler, Parmelee, Rosario) Top 25: 10 (Tosoni, Ortiz, Goodrum) Top 35: 11 (N. Roberts) Top 50: 14 (Herrmann, Bigley, Ray) OF 2012: Top 5: 4 (Rosario, Arcia, Hicks, Benson) Top 15: 7 (Parmelee, Kepler, Morales) Top 25: 8 (Goodrum) Top 35: 11 (Williams, Roberts, Perez) Top 50: 15 (Ray, Rams, Ortiz, Bigley) Outfield analysis: There has been movement upward, and this is on top of Ben Revere and Rene Tosoni being out of 2012 consideration due to MLB playing time). While Rosario may move to 2B, some players down the list farther may be moving to the OF (Goodrum, Perez, Rams). The depth has remained roughly the same while there is a movement from the top-middle to the top. ROCH: Benson, Parmelee, Bigley eventually. NBR: Hicks, Morales, Bigley, Rams and Perez eventually). FTM: Arcia, Roberts, Perez, Ray, Rams, and Ortiz eventually), BEL: Rosario, Kepler, Goodrum, Williams, Ortiz. C 2011: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 0 Top 25: 0 Top 35: 1 (Rams) Top 50: 2 (Herrmann) C 2012: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 1 (Herrmann) Top 25: 1 Top 35: 1 Top 50: 2 (Rams) Catcher analysis: Herrmann and Rams are going in opposite directions, and Rams may be moving to the outfield anyway). Herrmann hopefully will be an adequate defensive catcher while providing depth at other positions to keep is on base bat in the lineup. Danny Lehmann, Danny Rohlfing, and Josmil Pinto will be guys to watch at the mid-upper levels this year to try to provide depth at this position. At the lower levels, Matthew Koch and Phillip Chapman need to develop. This is a big area for the Twins to look at in the 2012 draft. ROCH: Butera/Towles, Rivera, Lehmann and Herrmann eventually). NBR: Lehmann, Herrmann, Rams eventually, Rohlfing eventually. FTM: Rams, Rohlfing, Pinto, Chapman eventually. BEL: Chapman, Koch. 1B 2011: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 1 (Parmelee) Top 25: 1 Top 35: 2 (Hughes) Top 50: 4 (Ray, Vargas) 1B 2012: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 2 (Parmelee, Harrison) Top 25: 2 Top 35: 2 Top 50: 3 (Ray, lost Hughes and Vargas) 1B analysis: Chris Parmelee has moved up the list and if Travis Harrison moves from 3B to 1B, the Twins may have bolstered the depth at this position. Ray and Michael Gonzales are worthy of watching at Fort Myers this year. ROCH: Parmelee, Pearce, Bates. NBR: Hanson, Colabello. FTM: Gonzalez, Ray. BEL: Rory Rhodes, Vargas, Harrison eventually). 2B 2011: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 0 Top 25: 1 (Goodrum) Top 35: 4 (Beresford, Hughes, Dozier) Top 50: 5 (Santana) 2B 2012: Top 5: 1 (Rosario) Top 15: 2 (Dozier) Top 25: 4 (Goodrum and Michael) Top 35: 4 Top 50: 6 (Santana and Beresford) 2B analysis: With the potential switch from the OF for Rosario, it would change the entire power structure of the Twins system. That kind of talent in the middle infield is enormous. Let's say, however, that the switch is a bit shaky this year, the addition of Dozier and Michael to the upper half is great). The depth is climbing to the top at 2B. 3B 2011: Top 5: 1 (Sano) Top 15: 1 Top 25: 2 (Goodrum) Top 35: 3 (Hughes) Top 50: 4 (Hidalgo) 3B 2012: Top 5: 1 (Sano) Top 15: 2 (Harrison) Top 25: 2 Top 35: 3 (Perez, if he stays at 3B, Hughes no longer prospect) Top 50: 4 (Hidalgo) 3B analysis: Very little movement and that is a problem. It may be that neither Sano nor Harrison can really stick at 3B (and the same for Perez and Hidalgo!). Joe Mauer start fielding grounders at the hot corner . . . and the Twins need to focus on this position in the system. ROCH: Chang, Burroughs. NBR: Deibinson Romero, Hidalgo. FTM: Perez . . . Grimes, perhaps BEL: Harrison eventually, fill-ins . . . SS 2011: Top 5: 1 (Sano) Top 15: 1 Top 25: 3 (Goodrum, Plouffe) Top 35: 5 (Beresford, Dozier) Top 50: 7 (Polanco, Santana) SS 2012: Top 5: 0 (Sano moves to 3B) Top 15: 1 (Dozier) Top 25: 3 (Goodrum, Michael, Plouffe no longer prospect) Top 35: 3 (Beresford dropped) Top 50: 5 (Santana, Beresford, Polanco dropped off) Shortstop analysis: Sano is likely done at short, but Dozier's rise helps this position immensely, as does the drafting of Michael. If they both can stay at SS, this is a great development at a problematic position. Daniel Santana will be someone very important to watch this year, and one hopes that Beresford and Polanco can turn it around. I would think that all goes well at this position this year. ROCH: Nishioka (ideally), Florimon, Chang, Dozier eventually. NBR: Dozier, Beresford. FTM: Santana, Grimes, Michael eventually. BEL: Michael, Bryant, Goodrum, eventually. RHS 2011: Top 5: 2 (Gibson, Wimmers) Top 15: 6 (Hendriks, Bromberg, Salcedo, Soliman) Top 25: 9 (Hermsen, Holbrooks, Guerra) Top 35: 11 (Stuifbergen, Lanigan) Top 50: 12 (Munoz) RHS 2012: Top 5: 0 (Gibson, Wimmers drop) Top 15: 4 (Hendriks, Gibson, Salcedo, Wimmers, Soliman likely converts to RHR in 2012) Top 25: 10 (Boyd, Boer, Hermsen, Stuifbergen, Bromberg, Hauser, Guerra converted to RHR) Top 35: 11 (Doyle) Top 50: 14 (Mata, Shibuya, Lanigan) Right-handed starter analysis: Liam Hendriks emerged as a true middle of the rotation caliber pitcher and he has the brain for pitching as well. 2011 was a mess in that Gibson and Bromberg were injured, Wimmers lost his control, and Guerra had to convert to a relief role. Soliman is likely to join him as well. So there is movement down towards the middle of the prospect list at this position, but at the same time the 2011 draft provided a lot of depth at the position with Boyd, Boer, Mata, and Shibuya). Wimmers is the key here, and Bromberg is right behind, but keep an eye on Stuifbergen, Hauser, and Boer as well). ROCH: Hendriks, Manship, Suarez, Bromberg eventually, Wimmers eventually, Stuifbergen eventually. NBR: Bromberg, Stuifbergen, Wimmers, Popham, Lanigan. FTM: Hermsen, Salcedo, Achter, Shibuya eventually, Boer eventually. BEL: Shibuya, Boer, Atherton, Christensen. RHR 2011: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 1 (Gutierrez) Top 25: 3 (Slama, Waldrop) Top 35: 5 (Watts, Pugh) Top 50: 8 (Oliveros, Jacobson, Tonkin) RHR 2012: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 0 Top 25: 2 (Soliman conversion, Gutierrez) Top 35: 4 (Guerra, Summers) Top 50: 6 (Watts, DeVries) Right-handed reliever analysis: The position is bolstered by the conversion from starter of Soliman and Guerra, otherwise this is a deeply problematic position. Lester Oliveros will be an integral part of this depth chart. While it is one thing to simply convert starters into relievers, gearing relievers to be relievers seems to be more likley to produce good relief pitching. There is a movement toward the middle and toward the bottom here. This will be a vital need for the Twins in the 2012 draft. That means hard-throwers. ROCH: Gutierrez, Slama, Guerra, Oliveros, DeVries, Burton, Bulger, Vasquez, etc. A whole bunch of guys. LHS 2011: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 0 Top 25: 2 (Dean, Diamond) Top 35: 2 Top 50: 4 (Darnell, Osterbrock) LHS 2012: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 0 Top 25: 0 Top 35: 3 (Darnell, Dean, Diamond) Top 50: 3 LHS analysis: Logan Darnell's rise is promising. Pat Dean and Scott Diamond need bounce-back seasons. This is another key area for the 2012 draft. ROCH: Diamond, A. Thompson. NBR: Darnell, Osterbrock. FTM: Dean, O'Rourke. BEL: Tomshaw. LHR 2011: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 0 Top 25: 0 Top 35: 0 Top 50: 3 (Ibarra, Bashore, Davis) LHR 2012: Top 5: 0 Top 15: 0 Top 25: 0 Top 35: 1 (C. Williams) Top 50: (Tyler Robertson, Matt Bashore, Ibarra and Davis drop) Left-handed reliever analysis: This is a weak area for the Twins, to say the least. Robertson and Williams are vital to the depth here. Bashore and Davis are coming back from injury. Ibarra is not someone that I personally believe to be a legitimate prospect. ROCH: Robertson, Maloney, Dumatrait, Albers eventually. NBR: Albers, Davis, Nelson, Steedley. FTM: Carter, Gonzales, Ibarra. BEL: Williams, Gruver, Hurlbut, Wheeler. This was meant to provide an overview of the direction of the farm system. It is an undervalued system, but there are some gaping holes. The Twins need to draft intelligently like they did last year. I do not propose that the MLB draft be positional, since there is and would be great value in simply taking the best guy available, but there are some areas of need to focus on. They are: LHP in general, RHR, C, and 3B. Of the first 25 picks, I would base my expectations around 6 LHP, 5 RHR, 4 3B, 3C, 2 1B, 2 OF, 2 MI draft. The future direction of the team is up to the reader. This post was meant to point out some expectations and limitations on players. The future is not bleak, and neither may be the future. Lefty pitching, hard-throwing rights, catcher, and 3B are vital right now. -
Spring Training Near - Dakota Watts
Shane Wahl commented on Dakota Watts's blog entry in Blog Dakota Watts
Wishing you the best this season. Thanks for blogging here. It is a great idea, and you are already living up to it. -
Article: Parmelee's Promising Power
Shane Wahl replied to Nick Nelson's topic in Twins Daily Front Page News
Hopefully he's more Lyle Overbay than Connor Jackson . . . I see that at his range of potential, though Connor was good for a year or two. With prospects there is a certain X factor that you cannot pinpoint until guys are in the show. Maybe Parmelee thrives up there and is only averagish in the minors for whatever reason (similar to Span). -
Left field is much bigger than right field in TF, so it makes sense to move Willingham over. And I would think that Revere in LF and Span in CF would be about equal to Revere in CF and Span in LF. Span is not an "average" defensive CF, by the way. He is a good one.
-
Article: My Journey to the Minnesota Twins
Shane Wahl replied to A33bates's topic in Twins Daily Front Page News
Great blog. It's weird to think that I now wish more for you to make the roster because of a blog post . . . but I kinda do at the moment. -
Article: Position Battles: The Hitters
Shane Wahl replied to Seth Stohs's topic in Twins Daily Front Page News
If Luke Hughes is healthy, he makes the team. Some people are undervaluing his, albeit surprising, defensive Ok-ness. Towles is certainly a better option than Butera offensively. I wouldn't call it "upside" but, my lord, he might have an OPS of .600+! And OPS difference of .100 over 100 plate appearances might be meaningful this year. Ideally, Drew Butera would be paid a nice salary to play at Rochester and work with the pitchers coming through the system. And Rene Rivera would be gone. We know what those two offer, which is not major league performance. Let Towles have a chance with the Twins, and CERTAINLY, give Danny Lehmann a chance. At least you might get something from him that can lead to an adequate future. Or maybe he shows some potential and can end up being packaged in some trade down the line (plenty of organizations might like a defensive catcher in their systems). Nishioka needs an excellent spring and to demonstrate that he can be a utility infielder, or else it seems clear that he belongs at Rochester. Burroughs is a nice option at the corners and maybe at second. -
What would the 25 man roster look like? What do you think?
Shane Wahl replied to Thrylos's topic in Minnesota Twins Talk
Hughes is not bad defensively at second. Maybe last year was an aberration, but he was ok at first and second last year. The reverse of 3 should happen for Nishioka. I maintain that they need to get the most value of the second half of his contract. This means starting him in Rochester so he plays every day instead of pinch-running every game. Also, if Carroll gets hurt midgame, Casilla can move over and Plouffe can be involved as well. It is known that Butera and Rivera are not valuable major league catchers. The choice should be between Towles and Lehmann until later in the year and Chris Herrmann. -
Article: Terry Ryan's Foolish Gamble
Shane Wahl replied to John Bonnes's topic in Twins Daily Front Page News
Spot on, John. The money isn't the risk, the particular relief role is! Hopefully a lot of the optimism surrounding Lester Oliveros proves to be founded OR a lot of the pessimism surrounding Alex Burnett proves to be unfounded. The problem, ultimately, is with the Capps signing. The Twins could have signed Coffey, Wheeler, Wuertz, and Zumaya instead. -
Hicks' composite numbers from FTM and the AFL were .251/.363/.404 with 39 doubles, 10 triples, and 8 homers. On top of stellar defense.
-
Dean struggled at Fort Myers, but was still called up to New Britain late in the year. I would expect him to end this year at New Britain again, but after maintaining his excellent K/BB rate at Fort Myers for 1/2-2/3 of the season.
-
Hicks still has all the tools and has made his way in 2012 to AA, one would think. He is still the best defensive OF, by far, and one cannot ignore his OBP. He also was great in the Arizona Fall League. The AFL is obviously a hitters league, but it is also a AA/AAA hitters league. He did very well there. Other than Sano, I am showing a bit of favoritism towards players who have actually made it to High-A (which is why I also am low on new draft picks who haven't played or who have barely played). Anyway, the issue with Hicks seems to be that he takes too many pitches. That is something that is easily corrected.

