Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    48,924
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    340

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. the offense has been good enough today to win. Nothing about that is sarctastic, I really believe that.
  2. Not to worry, it's not like he's the interim and potential long term GM or anything....Sunk costs have been taught in b-school for over 40 years, and the Twins still don't grasp the concept.
  3. Man, Dodgers sure showing the league you can't buy wins! Gotta draft and devleop your team.
  4. 1. If that were true, they wouldn't have signed him..... 2. I don't blame you, you aren't paid lots of money and don't spend all day* trying to figure out what to do with MLB players. *I assume you don't spend all day on this stuf....
  5. He also said he's hearing the Twins connected to Gordon now, clearly he's reading my posts here
  6. Thanks for the laugh, Seth!
  7. Ummm, the FO that signed Pelfrey to a two year deal? The FO that didn't want Abreu? I don't think they are stupid, I think they make some stupid decisions.
  8. Deduno for Pelfrey (at the start of games, pls). In about 4 weeks, Meyer for KC. That's about 1.5-2 runs off the ERA....should net a win or 5. Signing Pelfrey.....to two years.....who thought that was a good idea?
  9. Sarcasm is one of my favorite art forms, frankly.
  10. And out of AAA, if he'd go. He's just clogging up the bases at this point....
  11. DFA him. He serves no purpose, present of future. Whichever scout said sign him, and whichever FO person agreed, well, that person probably also signed a bunch of stiffs in previous years. DFA them too.
  12. That's what I meant to type, sorry. I have ZERO confidence they will do what it takes to get a long term answer at SS next offseason. They had that chance this year, and passed, despite being FLUSH with money.
  13. How many more games of this will you people with tvs have to watch? I feel bad for you. I only have to check the box score occassionally. I don't have to actually SEE it. Is it better or worse for your eyes than catching your parents....
  14. Hicks is going with the "I will never swing again" approach that I tried in little league?
  15. Fair enough....but then we go into next year with no SS again. It is a reasonable stance, just not what I would do.
  16. IMO, Twins aren't winning anything this year.....I'm trying to be more ready for next year, Brock. You do open a hole at 2B this year, agreed. But, you learn if you have a SS or not for 2015. I also don't think Dozier is so frail that if he fails at SS, that he can't move back to 2B and succeed. But I could be wrong about that. I'll take that risk to see if he's a SS.
  17. I'd probably work with him for a month or two out of games (again, if he's willing) and: 1. See if there is a chance it would work 2. Prep him for the move I don't like playing out the season, because then, well, you are going into next year with no SS again. My goal would be to find out, this season, if he can move back. You'll know with some certainty after 4-6 weeks of him praticing there, followed by 40-60 games of him playing there.
  18. I am relatively confident between Rosario, Polanco, Goodrum, and Santana that one of them can play 2B by 15 or 16. I am signficantly less confident one of them can play SS at all, but somewhat confident Dozier can. I've made my points, you all don't agree. We'll see where we are next year, when they have no SS, and Rosario is ready, and Polanco is in AA tearing it up.....(I am sure my optimism about players in the system is throwing some of you off.... )
  19. And, you suggested keeping Rosario in the minors all of 15, if I read your post correctly. That would be holding him down, if he is the potential AS 2B some here have said he can be.
  20. What is knee jerk about planning for the SS and 2B solutions in the future, by moving Dozier to SS and seeing if he can play it or not? If anything, I'm suggesting the opposite, plan for the future by seeing what you have or don't in Dozier, as opposed to making an uninformed decision about his ability to move back to SS in the offseason.
  21. I hate this idea so much it hurts. Holding down Rosario for another year, and him getting another year older, and the Twins getting no value out of him for another year. You still haven't said how to fix SS past that one year deal......if Rosario and Dozier are both 2B, and you have no SS in the system ready to come up. question: If Rosario in CF and Buxton in LF works offensively, why doesn't Rosario in LF and Buxton in CF work, since that works better defensively?
  22. What do you do after that 1 year, sign another 1 year guy? That seems like a bad plan.
  23. Never took your comment that way, my point remains: Their most likely SS in their system is Dozier. There were other ways to fix that this year, they chose not to, again. If they weren't willing to sign a Cuban this year, and weren't willing to trade for a SS this year, and weren't willing to sign a SS this year, why do we think they'd do it next year? Besides, any SS signed as a US FA will only be here 2-3 years, and you are back to having a black hole again.
  24. Unfortunately, April counts, every single year......
  25. Rosario, Polanco, maybe Santana, maybe Goodrum....maybe some other guy. There is zero chance Rosario is a SS. There is a tiny chance Polanco is (though, he'd be up here faster as a 2B). There is a larger chance Dozier is. I fail to see the downside. If it doesn't work, move him back to 2B. What is the out of org option, that could possibly be ready in 2 years, that they'd be able/willing to pay the price for?
×
×
  • Create New...