Things we put in our bodies that cause long term issues nearly every day; sugar alcohol ibuprofen pesticides ..... the list is endless, and none of use have a huge financial incentive to do so. Also, and I know you won't all agree with this......many PEDs are not harmful long term. Many of them will be fairly common drugs for all of us in the next generation....since their role is to help our bodies recover from damage.
Like, moving your leg ligament to your arm? Like that? Slippery slope arguements are not good arguments. No one is arguing to allow bionics. Why is a pain killer ok, but not something that actually heals the damage to the muscles? Why is surgery ok, but not SOME drugs (while others are)?
so, if they break a leg, they should not take drugs? What if they have a headache, should they take drugs? What is the line, between a pain killer, and a drug that actually helps the muscles recover? Isn't the second one actually better, morally?
There is plenty of money to be made in building all new stuff that no one else is currently building, but yes, protecting the past money is usually what we do......
So, they all have equal access to trainers, food, coaching, doctors, etc? I don't expect people to agree.......but the VAST majority of these drugs are about keeping a body healthy despite them beating the crap out of their bodies. I fail to see how that is bad for anyone.
I don't understand why it matters if we are adding to a natural cycle, or the major cause of the movement in temperature. I also don't understand why it matters if this is natural or not..........we have the opportunity to mitigate the damage to our species. We should take that opportunity, while doing our best not to alter the world in bad ways. There are small, low risk, things we can try. If they don't work, fine......
Or, since it is such a down year, just randomly throw darts after round 2 or 3.....and don't stress so much over something they have such little control over. But, that's just not how we roll in big companies......
Sigh.....even with giving my sons outrageous sums to help them, one of them is going to owe more in student debt than I currently owe on my house......
You also don't have to move Sano........and, Sano isn't Bryant....... So, they should have no CF, and only DH types? You have to take context into account when building your team, you can't field 9 David Ortiz's just to get his bat in the lineup. So far, Sano has looked brutal in the OF. Maybe they should see if Plouffe looks less brutal.