It's misleading to point out that in half his starts he's good? And in 25% of his starts he's not good, and in 25% he's bad? How so? I can't understand the dislike for Gibson. As for "only good in 1 year"....he's been in the majors all of three (full time)....and it's not like 2014 was bad, it was about league average..... How many pitchers have been better than him over the last 3 years? Of qualified pitchers? fWAR? 52 have been better than him over the last 3 years.......He's almost exactly a MLB median pitcher among qualified pitchers the last 3 years. If you expand that to guys who pitched 200 innings over the last three years....he's in the top third. Hell, among starting pitchers.....only 152 have pitched 200 innings over the last 2.5 years! What, exactly, do people compare him to, to think he's not a number 4 at worst, and close to a three?