Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    48,925
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    340

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. No Buxton, No K Plenty of Grossman, error Gibson on mound, pray
  2. Appreciate bats Not those bats, insectivores Haiku Writing Day
  3. IMO, of course, Gimenez is bad. He's not going to magically get better. Garver could be good. I'd like him in MN by June, getting used to being a MLB player, so that he's ready in a year or two, when/if the Twins are good. Rather than have him be a rookie with no experience in two years, I'd like him to be experienced in being a MLB player.
  4. Not actually. No. It isn't that easy, as you can see by reading the article. Also, TX had to convince their ownership.
  5. If he is AAA, not here, he provides literally no value at all to the Twins.
  6. If all goes well, he only plays about once a week next year also.....how many years does he stay down to avoid that, and provider zero value to the Twins?
  7. It's funny, I can't think of any Olivias I knew/know either. Now, I have a terrible memory for names, but I can't come up with one.
  8. Except ESan has legit value. As does Dozier and Castro. That's about it for movable veterans. I posted that Yankee thing because it talked about rebuilding, and not trying to win when you really don't have a chance to win. If I could find the TX GM's comments on that, I'd post those too....
  9. given they had no plan B for the 4th year in a row for the OF, too long.
  10. I admit, I'm easier to please than some. I'm also not tied into CANON like some. So I might not be the best small sample for this question...
  11. This is a great article about how RP and the save statistic are kind of bad for baseball..... https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/goose-egg-new-save-stat-relief-pitchers/?addata=espn:mlb:index and, it has some nice hearted snark, imo.
  12. For me it isn't the price, as the principle..... free over the air in Mpls, charge me money on line in Mpls. then again, if they could find a way to charge for radio, they would. That's probably the delta.
  13. I doubt anyone was offended by the intro.....it was a great intro.
  14. Moassthb just doesn't have a great ring to it, Craig.
  15. Why would I feel cheated? They are entertaining. I would like a bit more originality, but I paid twice, and probably will again on rerelease.... For both. No complaints from me
  16. When would you call up Garver? He's no spring chicken.
  17. Santana is old, not free, and is a FA in 1.5 years. Getting a top 20 prospect for him would be a great outcome, especially for a team VERY unlikely to make the playoffs this year, and probably next year. http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/how-brian-cashman-sold-the-yankees-rebuild/
  18. Fences are a royal pain. We took ours out in MN, and never put it back. That said, I know some people like them. Even taking ours out was a royal pain. edit: sigh. I just realized I used "royal pain" twice in that short rant. sigh.
  19. If someone offered me a SP in AAA that I believed was a number 3 for the next 5 years, I'd trade ESan right now. Assuming that's what you mean by Berrios type. Gonsalves is hurt, and his stuff is nice, but not awesome. Romero has already had arm surgery. Gibson and Santana aren't young. Santiago? Who knows. Mejia? Hard to say. I'd love to have another Berrios type, assuming you mean top 20 in all of baseball pitching prospect in AAA (which is what Berrios was last year).
  20. I can't see an AL team using him any other way than DH (when not pitching). Way too risky. If he's a legit top 10 pitcher, you just don't risk it as a fielder* *unless somehow those numbers do come here, in which case I probably just make him a full time OF, and no pitching. Which I predict will not happen.
  21. Agreed, it would be fun. We need more fun.
  22. Looks like Hicks', and Buxton's implosions.....all top prospects. The Twins can't afford this kind of "development" from top draft picks.
  23. To be clear, I think KLAW's point was that he could certainly hit better than most pitchers, but that projecting him as a DH here might not be a good idea.
  24. Beat me by two minutes! It was a nice piece. I really like his work.
×
×
  • Create New...